Procurement: Another American Debacle

Archives

October 4, 2007: Yet another U.S. military procurement mess. The issue is controversial. Both sides are pulling out all of the stops. Each side is showcasing retired generals, lobbying officials, and sending out press releases. The stakes are high, tempers are short, and it may take a while to figure out who is right. You might think the issue is Iraq, handling high-value terrorists, or even Iran. You'd be wrong, though. This battle is over who wins the KC-X (a new aerial tanker) competition.

Sounds mundane, doesn't it? Well, not so mundane when you consider the fact that the KC-135s that form the bulk of the Air Force tanker force are an average of 46 years old. In airplane years, that can be pretty old. And the tankers are arguably one of the Air Force's most important assets. They don't drop bombs or shoot down fighters. All they do is extend the reach of the planes that do.

How important is that? Consider that in World War II, the way you got planes to the front was to send them by ship. That was a very slow way to do so, considering that a carrier could only go about 55 kilometers per hour. Planes can cover that distance in a much shorter time (usually due to cruising speeds of about 600 kilometers per hour), but only if you can refuel them in mid-air. This was how the United States could deploy the 1st Fighter Wing to Saudi Arabia in 1990, after the invasion of Kuwait.

Tankers can also be deployed to places that may not want combat aircraft, allowing bombers to refuel to launch their weapons, enabling a bomber to launch from a base in the United States and hit targets anywhere around the world. The current Air Force tanker force consists of 546 KC-135s (based on the 707 airliner) and 59 KC-10s (based on the DC-10 airliner). The KC-135s are aging. Plans to replace older KC-135s with 100 KC-767 tankers were shot down by a crusade led by Senator John McCain. The KC-135s soldiered on, but were not getting any younger.

Is this competition likely to be resolved soon? That is doubtful . Recent competitions have become very bitterly fought. The HH-47's victory in the CSAR-X (search and rescue helicopter) competition has gone through two protests already, with more likely as the losing competitors try to pick the win apart. There is $40 billion at stake for the first phase of the KC-X program - and it could be as much as $100 billion if it replaces all of the KC-135s. In essence, the KC-X war will make the CSAR-X war look like peanuts. Meanwhile, as that war goes on, the Air Force will have to soldier on with existing tankers that will be pushing 50 years of age. - Harold C. Hutchison (haroldc.hutchison@gmail.com)

 


Article Archive

Procurement: Current 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 


X

ad
0
20

Help Keep Us Soaring

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling. We need your help in reversing that trend. We would like to add 20 new subscribers this month.

Each month we count on your subscriptions or contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage. A contribution is not a donation that you can deduct at tax time, but a form of crowdfunding. We store none of your information when you contribute..
Subscribe   Contribute   Close