WARS UPDATE

THE MIDDLE EAST +

EUROPE +

SUB SAHARAN AFRICA +

ASIA +

THE AMERICAS +

INTERNATIONAL +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Afghanistan Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Why Who
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Follow The Money To Victory

July 3, 2009:  Taliban violence continues to cause most of the Afghan fatalities. Civilian deaths are running at about 200 a month, Taliban at 300-400, and Afghan security forces about a hundred. Last month, 38 foreign troops were killed. The Taliban kill civilians either by accident (during a suicide or roadside bomb attack on security forces or government officials), or as part of their terror campaign. This includes killing local, provincial and national officials, in order to force officials to cooperate with the Taliban. This sometimes works, particularly at the local level. Teachers are also targeted, because the Taliban is very much against secular education, particularly school for girls.

Several hundred Taliban suspects are captured (in combat) or arrested each month, and that leads to a continual flow of intelligence on enemy organization and operations. This fuels an ongoing campaign against the Taliban leadership. Many of these men are located and killed or arrested. In Afghan tribal tradition (which is where the Taliban tactics and leadership comes from), the loss of leaders is more disruptive than it is in a professional army. Often, when a Taliban leader is dead or arrested, his followers simply disperse and go home. The high casualties among the Taliban leadership forces the Taliban to throw more money at the problem, in order to entice potential leaders (who get paid several times what a police or army commander gets) to step forward. The money is good (several times what a policeman gets), if you are willing to accept the high probability that you will get killed, wounded or arrested. But there are so many young men in the countryside without jobs (or guys just tired of subsistence farming), that there are always men available to recruit.  

The government, and Britain, will continue to destroy poppy crops (the source of opium and heroin), despite the U.S. shifting to a strategy that emphasizes going after the drug gang operations (improvised labs to convert opium to heroin) and leaders (including their banking operations). The U.S. is offering farmers assistance in switching to legitimate crops.

By the end of the year, there will be 57,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan. This is compared to 17,000 at the end of 2008 and only about 11,000 in 2006-7. Before that, U.S. forces had gone from 2,500 at the end of 2001, to 18,000 at the end of 2005. The U.S. has already increased offensive operations. But this year, there's a big difference. The U.S. ROE (Rules of Engagement) now forbids attacking any Taliban that are using civilians as human shields. Although the Taliban cause some 80 percent of the civilian deaths, the media makes much more of "foreign troops killing Afghan civilians." So U.S. commanders are going to try and reduce Afghan civilians killed by U.S. troops, without providing the Taliban with a decisive military advantage.

For Afghan civilians, there's a downside to this, other than Taliban units escaping destruction, in that there will be fewer compensation (for the loss of family members and property) opportunities. Foreign forces pay several thousand dollars per dead civilian, and less for destroyed property. Most of the claims made are turned down as bogus. Scamming the foreigners for compensation is a popular activity anytime there is fighting, whether or not there are casualties. Scammers will take advantage of Islamic law stipulating that the dead be buried the same day, and then claim that empty graves contain the body of a family member or friend. Foreign troops are getting better at detecting the scams, but Afghans still see it as an opportunity, especially since these attempts are not punished if you are found out (although if you succeed, local officials or police may demand a cut.)

German troops in the north are adopting a more aggressive ROE, as more Taliban (or tribal raiding parties/bandits) are being encountered. Their long time ROE had troops avoiding battle as much as possible. Now the troops are being allowed to go after Taliban fighters, rather than running away.

The first big American offensive began as a force of 4,000 American marines and Afghan soldiers and police (most of them marines) moved deep into Helmand province, seeking to regain government control of a valley that serves as a base area for drug gangs and the Taliban. The U.S. strategy is now to use an intelligence advantage to go after drug gang assets and Taliban leaders. In other words, follow the money.

July 2, 2009: A U.S. soldier was captured in eastern Afghanistan, outside a small U.S. base.  United States officials have released few details, but local civilians, and Taliban spokesmen, indicate that the soldier got drunk on the base (booze is illegal for American troops, but there is a black market on and off bases for the stuff.) The soldier, and three Afghan soldiers, then got in a vehicle to drive to another base. The four were not armed, and were stopped by some armed tribesmen along the way, and taken prisoner. The tribesmen soon sold their prisoners to a group of Taliban. This was the first time an American  military  member has been captured in eight years of operations in Afghanistan. Such incidents occurred several times in Iraq, often because troops left their base unarmed, for personal reasons.

June 29, 2009: In Kandahar, the provincial police chief and eight others were killed by 41 members of a counter-terrorism unit (which was apparently U.S. trained, as most such units are.) The 41 soldiers came to a Justice Ministry compound, demanded the release of a man (accused of forgery and several other things) police had arrested. The provincial police chief was called in, and after an argument (officials refused to release the jailed man), gunfire broke out, and the 41 troops left (and were later arrested). The government blames the U.S. Army for this, and the American response was that the men involved were on the Afghan payroll.

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article NIGERIA: Oil War Being Lost By The Government

Make A Comment     View Comments (3)
Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Nasty German Idiot       7/3/2009 11:14:49 AM
"German troops in the north are adopting a more aggressive ROE, as more Taliban (or tribal raiding parties/bandits) are being encountered. Their long time ROE had troops avoiding battle as much as possible. Now the troops are being allowed to go after Taliban fighters, rather than running away."
 
[XXX]ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Armed_Forces_casualties_in_Afghanistan
 
05|06-07|09 Fayzabad Area Hostile Battle German Special Forces Kommando Spezialkräfte conducted a clean and sweep operation 60km SW of Fayzabad with the objective of arresting suspected Taliban Leader Abdul Razeq. Abdul Razeq was taken prisoner after a few hours chase through the mountains. One German Soldier was injured during this Operation. 1 WIA
05|07|09 Kunduz province Hostile Hostile fire Troops of PRT Kunduz were ambushed with RPGs and small arms fire 12 KM off the province capital. No casualties were reported. -
05|07-08|09 Kunduz province Hostile Battle Troops of PRT Kunduz were ambushed with RPGs and small arms fire. German Troops returned fire which resulted in a Battle that lasted for hours. 7 Taliban were killed, 14 more were wounded and taken prisoner. No casualties were reported. -
05|15|09 Kunduz Hostile Hostile fire Troops of PRT Kunduz were ambushed with RPGs and small arms fire west off Kunduz. The attackers were repelled in an exchange of gunfire. No casualties were reported. -
05|16|09 Kunduz Hostile Hostile fire Troops of PRT Kunduz were ambushed with RPGs west off Kunduz. The attackers were repelled in an exchange of gunfire. No casualties were reported. -
05|25|09 Fayzabad Hostile IED attack An attack with an Improvised Explosive Device on a German patrol South off Fayzabad resulted in no casualties. -
05|30|09 Kunduz Hostile Hostile fire Troops of PRT Kunduz were ambushed with small arms fire NW off Kunduz. The attackers were repelled in an exchange of gunfire. No casualties were reported. -
05|31|09 Kunduz Hostile Hostile fire Troops of PRT Kunduz were ambushed with small arms fire and RPGs W off Kunduz. No casualties were reported. -
06|04|09 Kunduz Hostile Battle Large scale operation against taleban in Charrah Darreh. 120 german soldiers were involved. Troops of PRT Kunduz were ambushed with small arms fire and RPGs NW off Kunduz. 10 Taliban were killed. -
06|07|09 Kunduz Hostile Hostile fire Troops of PRT Kunduz were ambushed with IED followed by small arms fire and RPGs south off Kunduz.One Taliban was killed and two other wounded. Two soldiers were wounded. One DINGO was damaged. 2 WIA
06|15|09 Kunduz Hostile Battle German and Afghan troops battled the Taliban in Kunduz. At least five Taliban ware killed and another four were wounded. Also several Afghan troopers were wounded or killed. -
06|23|09 Kunduz Hostile Battle German and Afghan troops battled the Taliban in Kunduz. During this Operation, three Germans were killed and three other were wounded in action when their vehicle slided down a bank and turned over. Three Taliban were also killed.

Fatalities
HG Alexander Schlernick., Paratrooper Battalion 263

HG Oleg Meiling, Mechanized Infantry Battalion 391
OG Martin Brunn, Mechanized Infantry Battalion 391


3 KIA,3WIA
 
 
Quote    Reply

sjdoc    Just decriminalize the damned drugs   7/4/2009 1:06:46 PM
--
The solution to cutting off the Taliban's cash flow is simple.
 
End the "War on (Some) Drugs" and thus the U.S. government's price support program for the manufacturers and vendors of recreational psychoactive substances.  The only reason there's an exploitable profit margin in the Heroin business is because criminalization creates a restriction on the supply side that criminals can exploit.
 
Without criminalization, the supply of this cheap-to-produce product will meet demand, and the profit margin will evaporate. End of Taliban resources, end of Taliban effectiveness.
 
Just incidentally, end of Nixon's "War on (Some) Drugs" and billions of dollars in direct and indirect costs suffered by the American people.
 
What, this is rocket science?
 
--
 
Quote    Reply

Nasty German Idiot       7/4/2009 10:14:55 PM
Link

German soldiers in Afghanistan will not be endangered anymore by mushy rules of engagement. The German Ministry of Defence has finally decided to adapt the ?rules of engagement? to the reality in Afghanistan, according to a report of weekly Der Spiegel. Until now, the use of firearms against individuals was only allowed when these individuals undertook an attack or their attack seemed to be imminent. Furthermore it was not allowed to open fire at individuals who had stopped their attack. The use of firearms was only lawful when other tools of force (like less-than-lethal physical violence) would not have led to the desired result. The clause ?The use of deadly force is not authorized unless an attack is taking place or imminent? will be deleted now. Instead the RoE will read: ?Counter measures can be adopted as soon as an attack is predictable? ? for example the sheer presence of hostile forces such as the Taliban. Up to now, the rules read that only ?adequate use of military force? may be utilized. This clause will also be deleted and replaced with the word ?offensive operation?. Seemingly only a small difference, but a radical one in reality. The ?use of military force for accomplishment of the own mission? will from now on be allowed even before the use of force for self defence. By that step, it will not be necessary anymore to announce the use of force - as the military maneuvre of an attack simply doesn't include any announcement. This does mean in practice that German troops in Afghanistan are now allowed to conduct offensive operations at the discretion of their own commanders. Gone are the days that German troops would have to play sitting ducks so they could engage the Taliban.
 
^^

 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy