Afghanistan: February 4, 2003

Archives

US troops continue to get hostile treatment from NGOs. The aid groups continue to demand more military protection, while at the same time accusing US Army troops of causing unrest among Afghanistan's warring factions. The bad relations with the NGOs is not universal, but it is common and generally one sided. The army civil affairs troops are perplexed at the NGO accusations, seeing them as a combination of paranoia and ignorance. 

American Special Forces and civil affairs troops continue to develop relationships with Afghans, and from this they create sources of information on who is still with the Taliban, or engaged in banditry. Information can be bought, if you know who is selling. However, the large number of guns still in the country, and the ample displays of wealth (vehicles, cameras, electronic gear and new clothes) by aid workers have led to an increase in banditry. Afghans are attacked as well, but not as frequently because Afghans often fight back, and have less to steal. 

 

Article Archive

Afghanistan: Current 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 


X

ad
0
20

Help Keep Us Soaring

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling. We need your help in reversing that trend. We would like to add 20 new subscribers this month.

Each month we count on your subscriptions or contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage. A contribution is not a donation that you can deduct at tax time, but a form of crowdfunding. We store none of your information when you contribute..
Subscribe   Contribute   Close