Warplanes: January 12, 2004

Archives

: The Lockheed-Martin X-35 has been selected as the winner of the JSF (Joint Strike Fighter) competition, and designated the F-35. This is ironic, since the last plane in the F-series was the YF-23 Black Widow, the loser in the Advanced Tactical Fighter competition (the winner became the F-22). The question is obvious: Why not designate the X-35 as the F-24 or F-25?

An inquiry to the Air Force Public Affairs office resulted in a return call from the  Air Force Materials Command at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. The F-35 designation was simply chosen, without regard to any sequence of numbers, according to an Air Force spokesman.

This is the most dramatic break in the Tri-Service Designation Systems Fighter series since its inception in 1962 a total of eleven designations. The previous breaks in the post-1962 fighter series were the F-13 and F-19. The former was apparently skipped over due to the myriad of superstitions surrounding the number thirteen. There are several theories as to why the latter was skipped: One story had it being skipped to force the Soviets to waste intelligence resources to pursue a secret project many thought this was to be the designation of the stealth fighter project (actually it was the F-117).

The next question will be what happens with the future fighters that will be procured. Assuming the F-32 designation would have gone to Boeings X-32 (the losing competitor in the JSF fly-off), the numbers 24 through 31, as well as 33 and 34, a total of ten designations, are unaccounted for. Some of these designations may be assigned to aircraft that the United States has acquired. One of the gaps between the F-111 and the F-117 in the older series is filled by a fighter known as the YF-113. The plane is actually the Russian MiG-23 Flogger, and the YF-113s in American hands probably were acquired by various means for training and evaluation. Yet something has to be put into the pilots log books, and so a designation was created, although it was not released to the public.

One other reason that designators are skipped is due requests from a manufacturer or government agency. The X-49 designator was skipped for the Dragonfly, a Canard Rotor/Wing flying vehicle. Since it is a 50/50 hybrid between a helicopter and airplane, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), requested it be designated X-50. This is not the first time. In World War Two, Fisher requested that the P-73 and P-74 designations be skipped to give them the P-75 designation so as to create a catchy ad slogan (The French 75 in World War One; The P-75 in World War Two). A similar public relations move could be the reason the F-19 designation was skipped for Northrops F-20 Tigershark (to give the impression that it was of a new generation of fighters).

Other times, a designation will be altered for simplicity. The A-37 Dragonfly was based on the T-37 Tweet, an early primary jet trainer. It was a simple decision to switch the T-37 to A-37, since it was a heavily modified version of the trainer, and would normally be called the AT-37. 

This dovetails with the last reason for an unusual designator: Saving money and effort. This is why the AH-64D comes in versions with and without the millimeter-wave fire-control radar. The version without the radar was going to be designated the AH-64C, but the decision to go with just the AH-64D designation saved a little cash in the slim defense budgets in the 1990s.

There have been a number of other weird designations recently, like the KC-767, which is planned to the KC-135Es currently in service (the logical Tri-Service Designation would be KC-41). Two others are the FB-22, a planned strike variant of the F-22 Raptor (an apparent similarity to the FB-111 as a derivative of the F-111), and the AL-1A Airborne Laser, where the AL reportedly stands for Airborne Laser. Harold C. Hutchison

 


Article Archive

Warplanes: Current 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 


X

ad
0
20

Help Keep Us Soaring

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling. We need your help in reversing that trend. We would like to add 20 new subscribers this month.

Each month we count on your subscriptions or contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage. A contribution is not a donation that you can deduct at tax time, but a form of crowdfunding. We store none of your information when you contribute..
Subscribe   Contribute   Close