NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



NBC Weapons Article Index : Current 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

October 15, 2002

Remember the Axis of Evil? Well, Iraq is simultaneously the weakest and the most dangerous of the three. North Korea has at least one nuclear bomb (according to the CIA) and is building a second; it could perhaps build one or two per year. It also has an extensive chemical weapons arsenal, and a huge bioweapons program. North Korea is the only country in the world to vaccinate its soldiers against Smallpox. North Korea has missiles able to hit Japan, Alaska, Hawaii, and (on a good day) the continental US (albeit with no accuracy in target selection). But the country is broke and starving and is having to make no end of deals to get food. Because it is desperate, North Korea will sell just about any kind of weapon for money. Iran is the world's leader in state support for terrorism. It has chemical weapons and probably biological ones, and has been trying as hard as it can to get a nuclear weapon. It has an extensive array of missiles and produces a full range of weapons. Iran has been supporting radical groups in Central Asia. But Iran is also the least likely to provoke a direct war with the US.

Iraq has chemical and biological weapons and is trying to get nuclear ones. It is, in some ways, more advanced than Iran in that regard, but lacks key components (which it might be able to buy on the black market). Iraq has only a few old missiles but has been trying to adapt aircraft into cruise missiles of mass destruction. What makes Iraq dangerous is Saddam Hussein. Not a professional politician, diplomat, or soldier, he does not behave in ways that could be called rational or logical. No rational foreign leader would want to risk being caught selling a weapon of mass destruction to a terrorist group, and no logical military commander would fire chemical or biological weapons at US troops knowing how the US could respond if it chose to. But Saddam is neither logical nor rational.--Stephen V Cole

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend

   






New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy