Morale: Sympathy For The Devil


May 26, 2022: American use of airstrikes declined from 915 in 2020 to 500 in 2021. The main reason was a decline in Islamic terrorism, which provided most of the targets for airstrikes since the 1990s. The terrorists responded by using civilians as human shields. That was only partially successful because the use of UAVs for surveillance of targets prompts use of a guided missile if the Islamic terrorists got sloppy and moved without their protective civilians. The Islamic terrorists justified use of human shields by declaring Moslems killed because of this “involuntary martyrs” in the defense of Islam. Islamic terrorists also tried to portray Moslems in general as innocent victims of infidel (non-Moslem) violence. This was untrue, because for more than a thousand years there have been periodic outbreaks of what is now called Islamic terrorism. Islamic terrorists playing the victim card has worked on many Western journalists who are more interested in dramatic, and profitable, headlines than the realities of Islamic violence. Those headlines acquired a life of their own and created a media obsession with civilian casualties, which are the lowest in history because of use of guided munitions and more effective targeting equipment.

For example, it was big news in 2014 when five U.S. Special Forces soldiers died in Afghanistan when a GPS guided bomb was called in to the wrong location. What was unusual about this incident was how rare it has become. Since GPS guided bombs were introduced during the 1990s the technology and procedures for their use have been tweaked, automated and improved to avoid friendly fire incidents like this. The investigation of the June accident resulted in more tweaks to the system in a continuing effort to reduce friendly fire losses even further.

The elimination of most friendly (injuring civilians and American troops) fire incidents was one of many changes that have made 21st century combat much less deadly for American troops and civilians in the area. For example, the casualty rate for American troops in Afghanistan and Iraq has been about a third of what it was for their counterparts in World War II, Korea and Vietnam. Friendly fire deaths have fallen even more and are now about 20 percent of what they were in mid-20th century wars. There have been some other big changes.

Since September 11, 2001 the age of massive firepower has come to an end. It was the late 19th century introduction of nitrocellulose propellants for firearms and artillery and mass-produced precision metal parts that made possible machine-guns and modern (quick firing and quite accurate) artillery. This radically changed warfare, since the side with more of these guns, and ammo for them, had a huge advantage. It began a brief age of massive firepower, which gave civilians another reason to flee any area likely to be fought over. All that changed in the 21st century. Actually, you could see this coming at the end of the 20th century.

The 1990 war with Iraq was notable for the bombing campaign against Baghdad that resulted in remarkable pictures of precise damage using smart bombs. The media expected the usual widespread urban devastation, but reporters on the scene could only show individual buildings destroyed or heavily damaged by precise bomb or missile hits. Local civilians appreciated the new bombs and missiles because they were largely spared from injury or damage to their property. This was repeated in 1999 in Serbia. By the end of the 1990s, smart bombs became the majority of bombs used by American forces because they became cheaper, especially in that you needed fewer very expensive aircraft and a lot fewer bombs to do the same amount of actual harm to the enemy that ten or twenty times the aircraft (and even more bombs) previously required.

Because of the civilian casualty controversy, one of the major revolutions in warfare was downplayed. The American development of precision firepower from an occasional weapon to the standard one, rapidly replaced the massive firepower tactics that dominated the 20th century. For most people American smart bombs like JDAM (GPS) and Paveway (laser guided) represent "precision firepower." But the concept goes much further than that. American infantry are armed with automatic weapons but most of the time they fire one precise shot at a time. In Afghanistan and Iraq, the locals quickly got to know when American troops were fighting in the area. They were the ones firing single shots. The other guys fired their AK-47s on full auto. But it was the sparser American firepower that was more lethal and dominated the battlefield. Better training, and high-tech sights made the U.S. troops very accurate. This led to wider use of snipers, with up to ten percent of American troops qualified and equipped for this kind of shooting. Snipers alone have greatly changed American infantry tactics. Using night vision scopes, small UAVs, and personal radios for every soldier, American infantry battalions can quickly deploy a dozen or more two-man sniper teams that will turn a large area into a deathtrap for enemy forces.

Snipers are backed by infantry that fire much more accurately than did their World War II counterparts. At the same time massed artillery fire is a thing of the past. After 2000 many American artillery battalions were disbanded. U.S. artillery units now use a lot fewer, but much more precise, shells and rockets. For example, the GPS guided MLRS rocket has been in use since 2005. This 227mm weapon delivers a 100 kg (220 pound) warhead as accurately as a 500-pound JDAM (GPS guided bomb). When it comes to bombs, smaller and more accurate is what the infantry prefer. That's because, once the bomb goes off, the grunts want to get in there and capture or kill the survivors before the shell shock wears off. The blast radius of larger (500 and 1,000 pound) aerial bombs, especially unguided ones, means friendly troops have to stay several hundred meters away. The ideal weapon would be GPS guided shells. Now American cannon (155mm) artillery units are using (since 2007) GPS equipped "Excalibur" smart shells. Infantry commanders are particularly fond of this 45 kg (99 pound) shell, as it allows their troops to be as close as "across the street" from the target.

This produces another unique battlefield sound portrait. You know American troops are at work when one shell goes off, followed by a few shots. Much less shouting, American troops use individual radios, hand signals, and night vision equipment. They move fast, using minimal firepower, which means less risk of friendly fire or collateral damage, as in civilian casualties or property damage. Battlefields have never sounded this quiet or remained so intact after battles.

Because less fire power means a quieter battlefield that enables better trained troops, who know what to listen for, have more opportunities to use their ears to sort out what is going on. Silence can be a weapon. Precision weapons also reduce resupply problems, especially closer to the battle zone. Less wear and tear on the weapons as well.

Other aerial weapons, in addition to their smart bombs, have become more effective. New fire control systems enable jet fighters to use their 20mm cannon with greater accuracy. Ground troops can now call in jets to use their automatic cannon to take out a few snipers on a roof, or hit a particular window in a building. Warplanes rarely use unguided bombs any more. It's all smart gun sights, smart bombs, and guided missiles.

On the ground even machine-guns are used less. In the future machine-gun use will decline still further as computerized "enemy fire location" systems become more common. Widely used now for locating snipers, the troops (although not the brass back in the Pentagon) are eager to link the sniper finding systems with armed robots. With this kind of a system the sniper is located and fired on seconds after getting a shot off. This forces snipers to move and that makes a sniper more vulnerable.

UAVs have become decisive weapons, armed with light weight (10-23 kg) laser guided missiles. These missiles have become so reliable that some are being adapted for use by the ground troops. The age of big bangs and loud noises is over. Precision and small explosions are much more effective, for those equipped for this sort of thing.

Precision and speed have been a battlefield trend for over a century but no one really expected those trends to get to where they are now. So far, the 21st century has produced the greatest changes in ground combat since World War II, when widespread use of air support, armored vehicles, and radios created a radically different kind of ground war compared to anything before it. Now that has happened again and those changes are still evolving. The U.S. is building a “battlefield Internet” capability that will allow troops and commanders to exchange battlefield information instantly. For several decades the term “information dominance” has been tossed around, but now that concept is about to become a decisive weapon rather than a briefer’s favorite buzzword.

The mass media has also changed since World War II and by the end of the 20th century was more pervasive, because of more channels, worldwide access and the Internet. Media was also far more graphic, and substantially different from the earliest versions that appeared less than two centuries ago. For the first half century the mass-media was mostly words because the only images were artificial engravings that emphasized the spectacular, not the reality of news. By the late 19th century photos became the graphic device of choice. Even then, mass media avoided publishing the true gruesomeness of war and natural disasters. That was difficult to edit out when video news became a factor. This began to appear in movie theaters over a century ago, along with pure entertainment, and lasted into the 1960s. Newsreels were replaced by TV news that was eventually supplanted by digital video that became so common and cheap in the 21st century that just reality was not enough. That could be enhanced to attract more eyeballs, which were then rented to advertisers. It was the original mass-media business model on steroids. That caused a lot of changes and new misconceptions. Including distorting the impact of precision firepower in the 21st century.




Help Keep Us From Drying Up

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling.

Each month we count on your contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage.
Subscribe   Contribute   Close