Information Warfare: Documenting Chinese Crimes


May 31, 2016: The U.S. Department of Defense is developing a camera system that will capture videos of hostile (usually Chinese) fighters harassing American intelligence collecting aircraft in international air space. That will provide convincing proof that such violations of international law did indeed take place. These encounters are usually brief and unexpected, so the crew often have little or no time to take out cell phones and obtain video evidence of the encounter. The Chinese always claim that their aircraft remained at a safe distance. The new system (CASA, or Common Airborne Situational Awareness) is packaged in an existing pod that can be carried under one of the wings. Tests have shown that it works (automatically detects and videos any such close encounters).

The need for such a pod has been around for decades but only recently has technology caught up with the obvious solution. A good example of how much CASA is needed occurred in early 2001 when Chinese fighters regularly harassed U.S. reconnaissance aircraft off the coast of China. The recon flights over international waters had been going on since the end of World War II. But on April 1st 2001, a Chinese J-8 twin engine fighter accidently clipped a U.S. EP-3 four engine turboprop aircraft while harassing the American recon aircraft. The J-8 crashed and the pilot ejected (but was never found.) The EP-3 limped away and made an emergency landing at a Chinese military airfield on nearby Hainan Island. China would never admit it was at fault.

This problem has been solved before, but not by technology. Early in the Cold War, American recon aircraft were often attacked by the Russians and several were lost. But by the 1960s things had calmed down and in 1972, the U.S. and Russia signed an agreement to cover encounters at sea. Russian and Chinese electronic reconnaissance ships still cruise off American coats. Since 2001 China has been regularly violating that agreement.

In a legal sense buzzing foreign recon aircraft is a no-no. International conventions stipulate that the smaller, faster aircraft must stay clear of larger slower planes. That doesn't prevent you from intercepting and escorting aircraft flying off your coasts outside your territory. What apparently happened in 2001 between the J-8 and the EP-3 was a second rate pilot (the Chinese now have more modern Russian aircraft for their best pilots) coming up behind the EP-3 and finding out too late about how troublesome the air turbulence larger aircraft leave behind them can be. The J-8 is generally recognized as a pig of an aircraft and hard to control. The Chinese put themselves in an embarrassing position with the aviation community by accusing the EP-3 of causing the accident. Aside from the physical impossibility of that, EP-3 pilots are selected for their calm demeanor, not suicidal tendencies. Moreover, the EP-3 pilot’s primary task is to fly the aircraft along a precisely defined route (to get the best reception and to make sure the aircraft stays in international air space), not play games with fighter jets. Video evidence of this encounter would have made it clear that the J-8 was at fault.

After the 2001 incident China backed off on such close encounters but ten years later the aggressive attitude returned in the air as well as on the surface as China has formally claimed control of the entire South China Sea and is trying to force everyone out (unless they have Chinese permission to be there). Another reason China wants to keep American signals (electronic) reconnaissance aircraft (the U.S. Navy EP-3 and the U.S. Air Force RC-135) away from their coast is because of the apparent weaknesses in the Chinese air defense systems. The Chinese air surveillance radar system and the anti-aircraft forces its supports are, in reality, a ramshackle collection of new and elderly equipment that never quite meshed into a single reliable system. That means that carefully analyzing these network from international waters (at least 22 kilometers from the coast) reveals vulnerabilities that attacking aircraft could exploit. This is doubly troubling to the Chinese because the Americans are known to share this kind of information with their allies, especially Taiwan, South Korea and Japan.

Aside from that very real vulnerability, as China develops more powerful electronic devices they have become determined to keep the details secret (so their electronic wonders will not be easily defeated in wartime.) To that end, they have requested that the United States eliminate the use of aircraft and ships to monitor activity along the Chinese coast. Most of this is electronic surveillance. Some is simply keeping an eye on what the Chinese are building (in the way of military facilities along their coast.) The U.S. recon operations take place in international air and sea space, but the Chinese know that this does not stop the Americans from picking up lots of useful information. China has implied that if the U.S. does not cease this snooping, there will be more confrontations with Chinese aircraft and ships. Similar confrontations took place with Russia during the early years of the Cold War. Dozens of American military personnel were killed. China is also trying, without success so far, to unilaterally modify international law, to extend its territorial waters (that other nations cannot enter).

The EP-3 and RC-135 are getting old and will eventually be replaced by UAVs but for the moment they are the best tool the U.S. has for sniffing out things like gaps or vulnerabilities in a potential enemies radar coverage or air defense systems. These UAVs would also be able to carry the CASA pod. The main reason for all that Chinese hostility is that the EP-3s and RC-135s are very good at what they do and have been much in demand since September 11, 2001. The RC-135 in particular is a flying vacuum cleaner of electronic signals. Built on the same airframe as the KC-135 tanker and Boeing 707 airliner, it carries two dozen people to operate all the electronic gear. Exactly what kind of electronic signals the RC-135 can pick up is classified but apparently includes any electronic device the enemy in Afghanistan is using and most of what China has. With the withdrawal of American forces from Iraq and Afghanistan more U.S. electronic recon aircraft are available for duty along the Chinese coast.




Help Keep Us From Drying Up

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling.

Each month we count on your contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage.
Subscribe   Contribute   Close