Counter-Terrorism: Why al Qaeda Prefers Police

Archives

February 13, 2006: Why is terrorism being treated as less of a law-enforcement issue, and more like a military one? Two recent events may help put the failure to treat terrorism as a law enforcement issue into perspective. All too often, treating terrorism as a criminal matter, to be dealt with by law enforcement agencies, leads to terrorists going back onto the street.

For instance, a German appeals court has ordered the freeing of a recent al Qaeda associate, after legal maneuvering by a lawyer put him back on the street. This was despite the fact that he was found to be a member of the Hamburg cell of the terrorist organization. An earlier verdict that found the terrorist guilty was thrown out in 2004 by a German court due to American refusals to allow questioning of al Qaeda members in custody at Guantanamo Bay. This follows on the heels of the release on parole of one of the terrorists that hijacked TWA Flight 847 in 1985, killing a U.S. Navy diver.

Much of this shift is due to the fact that past trials have compromised intelligence sources. For instance, in American courts, withholding evidence from the defense can be grounds to overturn a guilty verdict. The problem is, once the evidence is known, it is often easy to guess how it was acquired. The other problem faced is the fact that in at least one case, a lawyer representing a terrorist passed information to followers of Omar Abdel Rahman.

This is one reason why the Department of Defense has structured the military commissions as they currently stand. By having military lawyers represent captives at Guantanamo Bay, intelligence can be used without fear of compromise. Nor do they have to worry about the lawyers aiding terrorist groups. At the same time, the defendants get a trial that is as fair as any court martial, with vigorous representation by talented legal counsel.

Terrorists have long taken advantage of legal terrain that favored them. In many cases, the criminal justice system has proven inadequate in dealing with the type of terrorism from groups like al-Qaeda. The new approach, which treats the terrorists as combatants in war, will allow them to be held for the duration of the global war on terror. In essence, terrorists will be taken out of circulation, and kept in places like Guantanamo Bay until they no longer pose a threat. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch will be upset, but those organizations do not have to deal with the consequences. - Harold C. Hutchison (hchutch@ix.netcom.com)

 


Article Archive

Counter-Terrorism: Current 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 


X

ad
0
20

Help Keep Us Soaring

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling. We need your help in reversing that trend. We would like to add 20 new subscribers this month.

Each month we count on your subscriptions or contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage. A contribution is not a donation that you can deduct at tax time, but a form of crowdfunding. We store none of your information when you contribute..
Subscribe   Contribute   Close