Support: April 9, 2002


Operations in Afghanistan have uncovered a rift between military airfield engineers and the people who build and operate the new C-17 transport. The crux of the dispute is the standard the army and air force airfield engineers use for Rapid Runway Repair (RRR). While the C-17 is touted as being capable of landing on rough landing areas, exact standards for how rough those landing strips could be was never worked out. This has created some tense moments in Afghanistan as C-17s landed on runways repaired by various RRR techniques. The older, lighter and more rugged C-130 didn't have problems with the existing RRR standards, but the larger C-17 was needed for it's longer range and higher payload. As a result of this, the RRR engineers and aircraft operators are got together in March to work out better standards for what constitutes a rapidly repaired runway.


Article Archive

Support: Current 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 



Help Keep Us Soaring

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling. We need your help in reversing that trend. We would like to add 20 new subscribers this month.

Each month we count on your subscriptions or contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage. A contribution is not a donation that you can deduct at tax time, but a form of crowdfunding. We store none of your information when you contribute..
Subscribe   Contribute   Close