Attrition: USN Chiefs Face The Cut


February 28, 2012: For the third year in a row the U.S. Navy has conducted a review of all its senior NCOs (Chief Petty Officers with 19 or more years of service). As a result, eight percent of these "Chiefs" were recently ordered to retire or face dismissal from the navy. That's 76 percent more chiefs that were forcibly retired in 2010, and more than three times as many for 2009, the first year this review took place. Two years ago the review included senior NCOs from the reserves. Last year 7,684 chiefs were scrutinized.

While officers command the navy, and the ships, it's the "Chiefs" who run the navy. Those chiefs with over twenty years' service (and thus eligible for retirement at half pay) are considered the most essential. But it was always known that some of these senior chiefs were just coasting and not living up to their responsibilities. Thus review boards were established to measure the performance, over the past five years, of all the most senior chiefs. Anyone with disciplinary problems or low performance evaluations would be in danger of not being "continued" (allowed to reenlist). But now chiefs who don't make the cut are forced into retirement immediately. Retirement can cost some chiefs a lot of money because those with less than 30 years' service will lose out on the 75 percent pay you get when you retire at 30 or more years. You get 40 percent pay if you leave after 20 years. The navy did not set any quotas for how many chiefs to boot they just wanted the low performers gone.

Aside from wanting to improve the quality of the senior NCO force, the additional retirements make it possible for more qualified chiefs to get promoted and for junior NCOs to become chiefs. Because of the recession more senior chiefs are putting off retirement and promotions to chief have slowed. The new review of the chiefs also motivates many marginal chiefs to operate more effectively.

This is all part of a navy downsizing program, "Perform To Serve" (PTS), that was instituted eight years ago. PTS is an effort to get rid of people the navy doesn't need (not possessing needed skills) or want (disciplinary or physical fitness problems). Initially only first term sailors, seeking to reenlist, had to basically reapply for their jobs. Three years ago junior NCOs also had to do so, including those with 10-14 years of service. About 90 percent of those who applied kept their jobs. The other ten percent were either offered a job in another area or told they could not reenlist.

Changing technology has caused shortages in some jobs and surpluses in others. The PTS program allows sailors in overmanned jobs to take aptitude tests to see if they qualify for training in another job. Some sailors can't make the cut and have to leave.


Article Archive

Attrition: Current 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 



Help Keep Us Soaring

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling. We need your help in reversing that trend. We would like to add 20 new subscribers this month.

Each month we count on your subscriptions or contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage. A contribution is not a donation that you can deduct at tax time, but a form of crowdfunding. We store none of your information when you contribute..
Subscribe   Contribute   Close