Armor: May 5, 2002

Archives

Criticism of the Army's new LAV (Light Armored Vehicles) program continues. The LAVs are costing $2-3 million each. But we currently have 15,000 M-113 APCs that are a lot closer to the LAV in performance than anyone thought. Moreover, many of the LAVs are now too big or heavy to fit in a C-130 aircraft. The C-130 is how the LAVs will make the trip to the battlefield. M-113's have no such weight or size problem. That is, unless you start adding some of the heavier weapons some versions of the LAV will carry. But critics point out that you don't need these heavier weapons for the types of missions the LAV equipped units will be going to (peacekeeping, for the most part.) Moreover, with money still short in the army, spending so much on new LAVs rubs a lot of people, especially those liable to have their programs cut, very unhappy. To muddy the water a bit more, the Army now calls the LAVs, IAVs (Interim Armored Vehicles.)

 


Article Archive

Armor: Current 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 


X

ad
0
20

Help Keep Us Soaring

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling. We need your help in reversing that trend. We would like to add 20 new subscribers this month.

Each month we count on your subscriptions or contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage. A contribution is not a donation that you can deduct at tax time, but a form of crowdfunding. We store none of your information when you contribute..
Subscribe   Contribute   Close