Armor: August 2, 2001

Archives

Critics Challenge LAV-III Choice- Those opposed to the new Medium Brigade concept, along with many others, are challenging the Army's choice of the LAV-III as the primary vehicle. For one thing, the existing M113 fleet can do anything that the LAV-III can do (including fit into a C-130) except for "high road speed" which is a rarely used attribute. The Army demanded an off-the-shelf solution but ended up buying a vehicle (LAV-III) which is still being designed (although it is based on earlier versions of the same 8x8 chassis). For example, the LAV-III as designed for the Canadian Army won't fit into a C-130, requiring design changes before it can be issued to Medium Brigades. The exposed externally-mounted machinegun on the squad carrier variant of the LAV-III is an anachronism in a day when remote weapon stations are the state of the art. The LAV-105 tank destroyer is inferior in every regard to the tracked XM8 Armored Gun System. The entire concept of the LAV-III was based on a "wheels vs tracks" analysis which was fatally flawed and rigged to select the LAV.--Stephen V Cole

 

X

ad

Help Keep Us From Drying Up

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling.

Each month we count on your contribute. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage.
Subscribe   contribute   Close