2008: The death toll of women serving in
Iraq reached 100 recently, when an air force sergeant died of natural causes.
So far 61 women have died in combat while serving in Iraq. This despite the
Department of Defense policy that
forbids the use of female troops in direct combat. This is mostly about
politics, but the rule is there and must be obeyed. Or at least an attempt must
be made to enforce the rule. While many women finding themselves in firefights,
and exposed to roadside bombs anyway, that's normal for a combat zone. As far
back as World War II, 25 percent of all troops in the army found themselves
under fire at one time or another, although only about 15 percent of soldiers
had a "direct combat" job. In Iraq, women make up about 14 percent of the
military personnel, but only two percent of the casualties (dead and wounded).
So the policy, which many politicians oppose, but most women soldiers favor,
appears to be working.
practical matter, you will never have a lot of women in combat. Mainly because
women have never been as effective as men in combat units. In the past century,
there have been several serious attempts to employ women in combat. Except for
some guerilla units, it never worked out well enough to make it practical to
continue the practice. But women have proved very valuable in combat support
units, where physical strength, and a taste for ultra violence, are not
essential. But American women have increasingly been in combat situations, as
part of a sixty year trend. That means more of them are getting killed or
casualty rate of the American 450,000 women who served in World War II (where
very few women were sent to the combat zone) was about 11 per 100,000 troops.
It was about ten times that in Vietnam, where some 10,000 women served.
However, the casualty rate for women in combat zones during World War II, was
about the same as for those women in Vietnam.
1991 Gulf War, 33,000 women participated, and the casualty rate was about the
same as Vietnam. That trend took a sharp turn upward in Iraq, where about ten
percent of the troops are female, although the women suffer casualties at about
one-tenth the rate of the men. This is largely because women are not in combat
units, and are not involved in convoy operations to the same extent as the male
troops. So far, about two percent of the deaths in Iraq have been women.
casualty rate for women in Iraq is over ten times what it was in World War II,
Vietnam and the 1991 Gulf War. A lot of the combat operations experienced by
women in Iraq involves base security, or guard duty. Female troops have
performed well in that. This is a job that requires alertness, attention to
detail and ability to quickly use your weapons when needed. In convoy
operations, women have also done well, especially when it comes to spotting,
and dealing with, IEDs (roadside bombs and ambushes). Going into the 21st
century, warfare is becoming more automated, and less dependent on muscle and
testosterone. That gives women an edge, and they exploit it, just as they have
done in so many other fields.
to past wars, overall casualties in Iraq have been quite low, with only 1.7
percent of troops getting killed or wounded in combat. Since most of the
casualties were suffered by the army and marines, and these two services only
supplied 40 percent of the personnel, their casualty rate was more like 4.2
percent. But that's still a third of the rate in Vietnam (12.5 percent, or
350,000 combat casualties for 2.8 million who served there).