NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Air Transportation Article Index : Current 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

USAF Terminates Transport Expansion

May 22, 2009: The U.S. Air Force is not expecting to get any more money to build additional heavy (C-17 and C-5 class) transport aircraft. No more than 205 C-17s will be built for the air force, in addition to 46 C-5s that will be refurbished and equipped with more powerful and efficient engines. This will provide a fleet of 251 heavy lifters. The air force has been trying to get at least 300 of these large transports. Instead, they will rely more on leasing civilian aircraft. This is done via CRAF (Civil Reserve Air Fleet). In 2003, for the first time since the 1990-91 Gulf War, the United States mobilized CRAF. Twenty-two airlines were ordered to make available 78 commercial aircraft (47 passenger aircraft and 31 wide-body freighters.)

CRAF was set up in 1951, and used for the first time in 1990. At the time, the air force was paying some $700 million a year to 32 airlines so that, if a national emergency was declared, the air force could call into military service transports with a minimum of fuss and paperwork. The program has continued since then. Aircraft can also volunteer their aircraft for military service, which is easier to do right now because of the depressed state of the air transport business. During the Gulf War, airlines that had their aircraft mobilized earned $1.5 billion in use fees. The CRAF transports moved 62 percent of the troops brought in by air to the Persian Gulf, and 27 percent of the air freight.

CRAF has worked so well that it took away a lot of the incentive, and Congressional support, to build more C-17s.

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article MURPHY'S LAW: Real Punishment For Phony Veterans


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

LB    Rubbish   5/25/2009 5:40:27 PM
Certainly leased airliners can, and always have, carried troops more cost effectively than military air transports but that is not why the nation requires less dedicated transports and in fact it does not.  The attempt to end C-17 production is entirely budget driven.  There is no analysis showing 205 is enough because it's not.
 
Moreover, the article is highly misleading in that most of the civilian airliners used are leased not CRAF aircraft.  Much of NATO is highly dependent on leased  An-124s as well as many US defense contractors.  Congress not buying more C-17s simply means more An-124s.  Memo:  There are no An-124s in the CRAF program.
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy