NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Air Transportation Article Index : Current 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Ukraine Keeps NATO Flying

December 26, 2008: NATO has extended, for two years, its leasing arrangement for two Russian/Ukrainian An-124 transports (full time) and another four on call as needed. These aircraft are leased from a Ukrainian firm. When the An-124 was developed, in the 1980s, much of the work was done in Ukraine (which was then part of the Soviet Union, which dissolved in 1991). Production is now split between Russia and Ukraine, and both countries operate the aircraft.

NATO plans to fly it's two An-124s 1,500 hours each in 2009, as well as booking over a thousand hours on the four other An-124s it has access to. NATO uses the aircraft to support peacekeeping operations in Africa and Afghanistan.

Russia has a major success on its hands with the An-124 cargo aircraft. Designed at the end of the Cold War, only sixty were built. But the market for aircraft that can carry oversize cargo has grown twice as fast as the air cargo market in general. The An-124, and the U.S. Air Force C-5, are the only two transports that can handle oversize material. And the An-124 is the only "jumbo" available for charter. So production of the An-124 will be resumed. Another fifty, or more, aircraft are to be built, starting in 2009. The last one was completed in 2004. The new An-124s will cost about $150 million each. Currently, about 40 An-124s are in service, 26 with civilian airlines.

 The An-124 is the world's largest production aircraft and can carry a payload of 120 tons. The An-124 cruises at a speed of around 800 to 850 kilometers per hour, it can carry a maximum payload around 4,500 kilometers, or carry less cargo, and more fuel, for up to 16,500 kilometers. There are around 40 An-124s doing commercial work, with another twenty in military service

 In the late 1980s, a modification of the An-124, the slightly larger An-225, was built. With two extra engines and a larger wing, the An-225 can carry over 250 tons. A second An-225 was being built when the Cold War ended. Construction was halted, but demand for An-124s has been so strong, that the second An-225 taken out of storage and is being completed. New An-225s would cost close to $200 million each. These are a bargain compared to the $225 million cost of a new American C-17 cargo aircraft. The C-17 also only carries around 79 tons of cargo. If sales of the new An-124 take off, more An-225s may be available as well.

 

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article INFORMATION WARFARE: Microsoft Puts The Royal Navy Under Water


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

aki009    C-17 Tradeoffs   12/26/2008 12:04:59 PM
It should be noted that the C-17 was not built to carry a maximum amount of cargo, but rather to focus on delivery of heavy loads to difficult locations with specific flight envelope and other requirements. For example, the C-17 requires only about half the runway for its operations compared to the An-124, which would be a critical capability in a conflict against someone equipped with runway busters.
 
Requirements like these placed limitations on the C-17 wingspan, carrying capacity, and other factors. Unfortunately most comparisons to the An-124 only emphasize the areas in which the An-124 shines (volume and weight capacity), and not those in which the C-17 stands out (operating from small airfields, being able to pack planes tighter on the ramp, high approach/departure angles, etc.)

 
Quote    Reply

LB    Pathetic   12/26/2008 3:59:25 PM
The real issue is NATO having to lease strategic air transports from a foreign power instead of having it's own transports.  The need for the aircraft is beyond obvious and instead of buying some we get the decades long make work program that is the A400 which is in fact not a strategic airlifter.  It's pathetic.
 
NATO is buying a tiny number of C-17's to be operated like the AWACS force but only the UK is buying it's own.  After Germany and France, among others, get around to buying some A400's (to replace old aircraft) the requirement for a strategic air transport will still remain.  It's just one more basic military requirement that NATO nations continue to ignore.  Things like this are very simple indications to others around the world of a lack of spine.
 

 
Quote    Reply

aki009    Euro Strategic Lift   12/26/2008 4:21:05 PM
Excepting England, Europe has for some time shown to be unwilling to project power beyond it's immediate surroundings. In the near term the impact of this is the frenchification of Europe, in that their primary leverage in global foreign policy will be to say "no". Case in point: while the details can be debated ad nauseam, the reality is that when it came time to show unity against Iraq, a surprisingly small number of European countries were truly willing to stand up against a dictator.
 
It's only too bad for Europe, that the next stage of frenchification is to be ignored by the rest of the world when it comes to global policy issues. It seems to me that this stage has already begun to manifest itself.
 
 
Quote    Reply

Photon       12/26/2008 10:02:25 PM
I think the lax attitude by most of European NATO members is merely a consequence of heavily US-based NATO.  If they have no US to piggyback-ride, then they will more likely to be serious about keeping their military inventories up to date.  So far, the fact of the matter is, there is simply not enough incentive for them to crank up military spending.
 
Since the Ukraine also manufactures An-124, maybe it is not terribly bad.  (If Russia were the sole manufacturer, then it would be a different story.)  If enough of these Antonovs become available, they should be an adequate cargo fleet until the EU or the US come up with designs that better meets NATO needs.
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy