WARS UPDATE

THE MIDDLE EAST +

EUROPE +

SUB SAHARAN AFRICA +

ASIA +

THE AMERICAS +

INTERNATIONAL +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Humiliated Hamas Lashes Out

January 21, 2009:  Hamas thought they were invulnerable to Israeli attack. By placing so many of their military and government facilities in densely populated residential neighborhoods, they believed any Israeli bombing or shelling would cause high, and politically unacceptable,  civilian losses. But the Israelis used surprise, more precision than expected, and innovations like calling civilians in the target area and telling them to get out before the bombs hit nearby. As a result, most of the 1,300 Palestinian dead were Hamas personnel, and nearly all the damaged structures were those used by Hamas. The Palestinians cranked up the spin machine anyway, and accused the Israelis of war crimes and genocide. But Israel responded with a media campaign featuring aerial videos of Hamas fighters setting up mortars and rockets next to schools and residential neighborhoods. This didn't stop the usual alliance of leftists, anti-Semites and Islamic radicals from calling Israel names. But the mud didn't stick nearly as much as in the past. It's as if the Israeli campaign was seeking to humiliate and discredit Hamas, as much as it was to destroy military and government assets.

Dozens of senior Hamas officials were killed by smart bomb attacks. The families of these Hamas leaders often died as well. Israel ignored Hamas attempts to protect its leaders by surrounding them with women and children in residential areas. What dismayed Hamas the most was Israel finding the location of their officials. Even before the ceasefire took effect on the 18th, Hamas death squads were rounding up the usual suspected (members of rival Fatah, and anyone else unlucky enough to be suspect) for torture and execution. The UN did not pay much attention to this, as it has been going on for over two years in Gaza. In that time, over 400 Fatah members have been killed by Hamas death squads, and many more Fatah (and any other Hamas rivals) tortured, wounded or jailed. Hamas apparently didn't realize that there were other ways to get target locations, besides informants on the ground. But all they understood was informants, so Hamas went after informants, and Hamas felt better after. But the bombings continued.

Israel believes it has destroyed 60 percent of the 200 or so smuggling tunnels that bring weapons (particularly long range rockets for attacks on Israeli civilians) into Gaza. Israel wants Israeli or American sensors and technicians prowling the Egyptian border to detect all the tunnels, and for Egyptian border guards to destroy them. Hamas opposes this (as do many Egyptian officials, especially the ones who benefit from the bribes of the tunnel operators). Negotiations continue.

Ultimately, Hamas found that hiding their senior leadership in hospitals or orphanages offered the best protection from Israeli attack. Weapons and key items of military equipment could also be stored there. Hamas apparently exercised some restraint,  in to what degree they took over these institutions for military purposes. Someone in Hamas began doing the math, and realized that, at a certain point, a hospital full of weapons and Hamas personnel stopped being a hospital to Israeli commanders, and became a prime target.

Israel believes that Hamas had about 3,000 rockets in late December, and that during the 22 day campaign, about 700 of those rockets were fired in the general direction of Israel, while Israeli air (mostly) and ground forces destroyed another 1,300. That leaves Hamas with about 1,000 rockets, and dozens of functioning smuggling tunnels to Egypt through which components for replacement rockets can be moved.

Hamas claimed that Israeli bombs and troops did $1.9 billion worth of damage. It was probably closer to a few hundred million dollars. There were only about a thousand smart bombs used, and many of these were small ones (like the new U.S. 250 pound SDB, which Israel recently received). Hamas claimed that 5,000 homes were destroyed (and 20,000 damaged), along with 16 government buildings and 20 mosques. There are about 147,000 buildings in Gaza. Israel may take another media shot at Hamas by releasing photos of what was actually destroyed, and let Hamas try to dance away from their lies. But that may not be necessary, as Hamas is already the growing  target for ridicule in the Arab world. If Israel was trying to get Hamas exposed as a bunch of tyrants, genocidal liars and blowhards, they seem to have succeeded,

January 20, 2009:  The last Israeli troops were leaving Gaza, and taking up positions along the Gaza border.  Apparently Israeli forces are being prepared for a quick return to Gaza if Hamas and Egypt do not come through on the terms of the ceasefire (mainly the security on the Egyptian border.) Palestinians continue to fire rockets into southern Israel, and shoot at Israeli troops.

January 19, 2009:  Hamas accepts the ceasefire, sort of, they way they usually do. That means rockets will still be fired at Israel, Hamas will still call for the destruction of Israel, and peace will depend on how effectively smuggling into Gaza can be controlled. Israel has made it clear that, whenever it believes Hamas is becoming too dangerous, it will send bombers and troops in again.

January 18, 2009: The initial response to the Israeli ceasefire was the launching of eight rockets into Israel. These were fired from residential neighborhoods in or around Gaza City. Sometimes the Israelis caught the launch on one of their UAV vids. Many of these videos have quickly shown up on the Internet. While intended to expose Hamas culpability in the deaths of Palestinian civilians, the vids have also been a major blow to Hamas morale. Israeli use of UAVs has been more intense than in any previous conflict. The Israelis have also developed techniques to get information seen from the air, to the appropriate troops (air force, artillery, nearby infantry, Information War) quickly.

January 17, 2009: Negotiations with Hamas over a ceasefire continued, and about two dozen rockets were fired into Israel. In an effort to break the deadlock, Israel declared a unilateral ceasefire, to begin at 2 AM on the 18th. Israeli troops would stay in Gaza until Hamas agreed to a ceasefire.

Meanwhile, Israeli troops moved into Gaza city, easily destroying any Hamas fighters who tried to interfere. Hamas fighters were not prepared for combat, and this is a serious problem for Hamas. It was not just lack of training (some Iranian trained Hamas fighters also got killed quickly), but a lack of combat leadership. Higher Hamas commanders had worked up elaborate defense plans, but there was not lower ranking (lieutenants, captains and sergeants) to carry it out. Hamas is largely based on spectacle,  theater and putting on a show. That doesn't work on the battlefield, at least not as well as the Israeli approach (good leadership and lots of training).

Israeli troops used new training techniques (and lots of practices) to keep their losses low. While about 400 Hamas fighters were killed trying to oppose the Israeli advance, only nine Israeli troops died (and this includes four killed by friendly fire).

January 14, 2009: Hamas has agreed to a truce, that would halt rocket and mortar attacks into Israel, and allow goods to enter Gaza. Hamas is fighting Israeli demands that strict security be established to keep weapons (especially long range weapons) out of Gaza.

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article PROCUREMENT: Japan Looks Elsewhere

Make A Comment     View Comments (59)
Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Pages: 1 2 3 4   NEXT
Vulture       1/21/2009 9:59:22 AM

Wow you have so many errors in your article that its not even funny. What is this mama's basement journalism?

Wow you registered just to make a lame blanket statement w/o details?   What are you a blogger?
 
Quote    Reply

Dave_in_Pa    Not enough, too incomplete   1/21/2009 10:18:22 AM
IMO, the Israeli politicians stopped the IDF too soon.  They should have destroyed Hamas. And declaring a unilateral truce without getting back their kidnapped soldier, Gilad Schalit, is inexcusible.  They also should have captured the corridor along the Gaza-Egypt border and stayed as long as it took to destroy ALL the tunnels, plus intense seeding of the underground with hidden mines against future digging.
 
Quote    Reply

AlMansour    Big Question   1/21/2009 12:09:28 PM
What happened to Hisbu'allah after their big victory two years ago you'd have thought they'd be up for another crack at the big "I"!  Or maybe they didn't fancy being de-housed or were surprised at Hamas staying at home and hiding under  the bed while the IDF were outside.  Makes you wonder why these guys are so bombastic on Al Jazeera but so shy when it comes down to the nitty gritty.  Even their high command lives in Damascus.   
 
Quote    Reply

Advanguard       1/21/2009 12:11:59 PM

Its about time someone writes the other side of the story. Also I think it is a good idea to post israeli survailence videos on a youtube site to tell the people what the mainstream meda is not willing to televise. Hamas entire objective is to exterminate the jews. Pray for Israel

 
Quote    Reply

JohnC       1/21/2009 12:30:12 PM
The harsh reality is the campaign will not have achieved much.
 
It has killed some Hamas leaders. Killed some Hamas. Blown up  some smuggling tunnels.
 
On the downside, it will have created more martyters and for those who lost family in the war, there will be more potential recruits for Hamas and even suicide bombers. In addition, the war cost a fortune in munitions. The chaos left behind by the Israel bombardment is ideal environment for extremists to operate in.
 
Last week I saw students collecting outside Kings College in London, UK  for 'humanitarian relief for Gaza' and was suprised by the amount given by ordinary people. Another impact of the campaign may be a surge in financial support for Hamas.
 
The end will have to be negotiated and both sides know it.
 
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd    to Dave_in_Pa   1/21/2009 2:15:28 PM
Do not be to sure that this operation is really over, the troops have only pulled back to their start positions and are resting and rearming.  They were probably reaching the end of their endurance anyway, so the pullback was probably simpler than rotating new units into the lines.  The unilateral Israeli cease fire may actually be more of "an offer they can not refuse" to Hamas.  They will anyhow, but that will just sour their reputation even more.
 
Hamas has keep launching attacks to justify their resistance, so Israel will have cause to march back in any time that they feel it is advantageous.  But first they are going to force the Obama team to take a crash course of the futility of negotiating with Hamas and the general corruption of 3rd world governments.  Lets see how long it is before they say "they cannot be reasoned with".
 
Hamas in the mean time will be working to shore up the regime at home in the Gaza Strip.  This will involve politics, which is not something you can do while hiding in the basement of a hospital, so the surviving Hamas leaders will have to be seen in public fairly frequently.  Remember how the campaign started with a big salvo of bombs targeted on the old Hamas leaders?  Could Israel be trying to get the surviving Hamas leadership back out in the 'open', where they can be targeted, again?
 
Quote    Reply

FJV       1/21/2009 4:32:47 PM
Strange how everybody acts like this whole Hamas thing has ended.
 
This could just be a begin.

 
 
 
Quote    Reply

EvanH       1/21/2009 5:50:58 PM
What will be interesting to see in how this plays out is if Hamas learns from its mistakes.  If they truly believe thier own propaganda, and consider themselves as the "winners" for just merely surviving, then they'll use the same losing strategies again.
 
Quote    Reply

Nasty German Idiot       1/21/2009 6:31:31 PM
"As a result, most of the 1,300 Palestinian dead were Hamas personnel, and nearly all the damaged structures were those used by Hamas."
 
Both sides refused to let journalists inside, but the quite reliable evidence of attacks on UN Schools (for which Israel apologized) alone account for over 100 entirely civilian casualties   I would like to know where the author gets his information from, maybe he sneaked through the Israeli lines.
 
Quote    Reply

TonyHarrison    body counts   1/21/2009 6:54:58 PM
The author of this article may be using the mainstream media figure of 600 dead militants and 700 civilians killed.  I suppose you could say most of the dead were militants, if you were trying to paint out the true cost.  It's disturbing that some people find comfort in part of the tally and can gloss over civilian deaths. 
 
Is it true the IDF counted policemen as militants?  That would pretty messed up because if you think about it, in that situation (total blockade) you would probably take any paid work.
 
Quote    Reply

Vulture       1/21/2009 7:02:23 PM
...
Is it true the IDF counted policemen as militants?  That would pretty messed up because if you think about it, in that situation (total blockade) you would probably take any paid work.


Well all of the police are Hamas loyalists,  it is a reward to get a paying job as police where you get to tote your weapon every day.  Actually all gov jobs are a reward in Gaza, Al Fatah was paying their people to man the non functional "international" airport as support for the remaining loyalists to Abbas.
 
 
Quote    Reply

Nasty German Idiot       1/21/2009 7:03:07 PM
I recognize the fact that "only" 60 % of the casualties were civilians- (which is low if you consider the way Hamas set up their shelters)  Still "mostly militants" is bull. 
 
Quote    Reply

TonyHarrison    body counts   1/21/2009 7:15:39 PM
The author of this article may be using the mainstream media figure of 600 dead militants and 700 civilians killed.  I suppose you could say most of the dead were militants, if you were trying to paint out the true cost.  It's disturbing that some people find comfort in part of the tally and can gloss over civilian deaths. 
 
Is it true the IDF counted policemen as militants?  That would pretty messed up because if you think about it, in that situation (total blockade) you would probably take any paid work.
 
Quote    Reply

warpig       1/21/2009 7:36:46 PM
What I find disturbing is that some people attach any importance at all to the fact there were civilian casualties instead of attaching importance to the fact that the Israelis clearly exercised great prudence and great care in attempting to minimize civilian casualties while attacking legitimate military targets.  Considering the TTPs of Hamas, it requires a pretty minimal indication of enemy activity before firing on a building for any resulting civilian casualties to be the Hamas' fault.  It's pretty close to a case of being that unless there were any instances of any Israelis intentionally attacking civilians, all the civilian deaths are solely the fault of Hamas, probably including however many civilians were killed in that school.
 
All it would take for all the bloodshed to end today and forever would be for the Arabs to stop attacking the Jews.  If they can't abide the borders and living arrangements the way they are today and think they must fight the Jews, then all it would take for there to be extremely few civilian casualties on both sides would be for the Arabs to stop using civilians as cover and stop using civilian facilities for military purposes.  If they can't abide the way things would work out if they fought that way (i.e., they know they'd get their asses kicked) and think they must fight the Jews from behind and amongst their own civilian population, then the resultant civilian casualties--as long as the Israelis exercise reasonable care to avoid them if possible while still accomplishing their military mission--are entirely the fault of the Arabs who are fighting in that manner.  Therefore if the civilian casualties (provided the Israelis exercised due care to minimize them) resulting from this foray into Gaza are 700 or 70,000, they are entirely the fault of Hamas.  Period.
 
 
Quote    Reply

sijoint       1/21/2009 9:00:06 PM
Before everybody dumps on Israel for having the audacity to protect its Southern citizens from rocket attack, please consider the following...

Since the start of 2007
, 16,000 civilians have been killed in fighting. Not in Gaza, so you may have missed it. It was in Somalia, where an Islamist movement is fighting Ethiopian troops. This is the 18th year of civil strife in that country.

In Sri Lanka, some 70,000 people have perished in a civil war that has flared on and off since 1983. The regime in Myanmar (formerly Burma) has killed thousands and forced an estimated 800,000 into involuntary servitude.

In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (formerly Zaire) 45,000 people are dying every month. Nearly 5 and a half million have died since 1998 in a conflict that grew out of the violence in Rwanda and spread. Half of those deaths were of children under the age of 5, according to the International Rescue Committee. The violence in the Democratic Republic of the Congo has caused more human devastation than any conflict since World War II.

In Darfur, Sudan, more than 200,000 people have been killed and 2.5 million made homeless by violence.

To cite these sad data is not to suggest that suffering is tolerable in any particular case — but merely to observe that the world is strangely blinkered in the tragedies to which it responds. I don't see Londoners or Spaniards marching 100,000 strong to protest slaughter in Congo or Sri Lanka.

And ya wonder why Jewish folks get touchy about anti-Semitism....
 
Quote    Reply
Pages: 1 2 3 4   NEXT





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy