WARS UPDATE

THE MIDDLE EAST +

EUROPE +

SUB SAHARAN AFRICA +

ASIA +

THE AMERICAS +

INTERNATIONAL +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Kosovo Declares Independence

February 18, 2008: The Serb government is preparing to back a "rejection movement" by Kosovar Serbs. The Kosovar Serbs claim they will not accept Kosovo's unilateral declaration of independence. Serbia is expected to continue to insist on partition of Kosovo into an Albanian-dominated "Kosovo South" and a Kosovar Serb "statelet" that may ultimately join Serbia. The UN estimates that 120,000 Kosovar Serbs remain in Kosovo. Meanwhile, the government of "independent Kosovo" expects several European Union nations to approve Kosovo's declaration of independence within the next week. Several EU states, however, oppose independence. These states include Romania, Spain, Greece, Slovakia, and Cyprus. Romania is concerned about its own secessionist Hungarians; Spain is concerned about its secessionist Basques. An independent Kosovo could set a precedent for a separate "Turkish Cyprus" as well. The government of Russia said that it will support Kosovar Serbs  if they contests Kosovo's declaration of independence. Russia argues that the UN has no basis for allowing Kosovo to separate from Serbia. Russia has called on the UN to condemn the Kosovo declaration of independence as illegal.

 

February 17, 2008: Kosovo unilaterally declared independence from Serbia.  Kosovo's parliament unanimously voted to declare independence from Serbia. Pro-independence demonstrators in Kosovo's capital, Pristina, celebrated the declaration. The Kosovo government pledged to "protect the rights of Kosovar Serbs" (in Kosovo's Serbian enclaves). Approximately 2,000 Kosovar Serbs reportedly demonstrated outside the US embassy, protesting the declaration of independence.  The Serbian government denounced the declaration of independence and accused the west of helping create "a false state" (ie, Kosovo).

 

What will happen in Kosovo? The next three to six months will be a period of tense and risky diplomacy. At the moment NATO intends to keep a peacekeeping force in the country. The EU has begun organizing a "rule of law" task force to help Kosovo create a robust and democratic legal system (as part of the EULEX mission to Kosovo). Kosovo's declaration is supposedly a "limited" declaration. Kosovo will permit international peacekeepers (an "international presence") and will protect ethnic minorities (Kosovar Serbs and Roma being the primary ethnic minorities). Kosovo has also indicated that it will not try to unify with Albania (ie, there is no "Greater Albania" on the horizon). So what are the risks? Russian opposition in the chief risk, and there are several reasons for opposition from the Kremlin. The Kremlin believes Kosovo's unilateral declaration of independence sets a bad precedent for dealing with separatism in Europe. Kosovo's independence has also been sold as "supervised independence" or "limited independence." Oxymorons? Sure. What they mean is unclear,  and is supposed to be unclear, because clarity risks angering Kosovar Albanians who want independence. Serbs are already alienated and angry and terms like "supervised" are supposed to reassure them. "Supervised independence", however, implies an international role and that usually means the United Nations. Russia has a veto in the UN. Does that mean Russia can veto supervision?  Like we said, the next three to six months should provide an answer to that question.

 

February 12, 2008: Members of  the Serbian Radical Party (SRS) said they would demand a "state of emergency" if Kosovo declares independence

 

February  7, 2008: The prime minister of Kosovo claimed that 100 countries around the world were prepared to recognize Kosovo's independence. Rumors circulated in Europe claiming that Kosovo would declare independence on February 17.

 

February 4, 2008: The European Union agreed to fund a task force with 1800 personnel  to support Kosovo's transition to independence. The task force would focus on strengthening the "rule of law" in Kosovo (building judicial and police institutions).

 

February 3, 2008: Serbia reelected Boris Tadic as its president. Tadic narrowly defeated "ultra-nationalist" Tomislav Nikolic, by receiving 50.5 percent of the vote. Tadic opposes renewed warfare over Kosovo and supports Serbia's economic and political integration with Western and Central Europe. Nikolic, however, looks east -- to Russia, and he doesn't shy from violent threats. Nikolic has asked for Russian troops to be deployed to Serbia to help "balance" NATO's power. He is adamantly opposed to Kosovo's independence.

 

February 2, 2008: Bosnia reported that "several thousand" former "foreign fighters" (ie, foreigners who fought for Bosnian Muslim forces during the Bosnian War) were fighting against Bosnian government plans to deport them. So far 613 foreign born Muslims have lost their Bosnian citizenship. Bosnia has been expelling some of these men as "threats to national security." This means the men are Islamist radicals who might become terrorists.

 

February 1, 2008: Macedonia and Albania indicate that they will try to open their borders, or at least make them "visa-free" for Macedonian and Albanian citizens. The decision is regarded as an indication that both countries want to demonstrate they are capable of implementing and managing EU-type transit regulations

 

January 31, 2008: Russia granted political asylum to Mirjana Markovic, the wife of Serbia's now dead dictator, Slobodan Milosevic. Russia also granted asylum to Marko Milosevic, the dictator's son. The asylum was granted in March 2006 but only confirmed this year. Marko Milosevic faces international criminal warrants for his alleged involvement in a plan to murder former Serb president Ivan Stambolic.

 

 

 

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article SURFACE FORCES : An American Tragedy

Make A Comment     View Comments (6)
Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Matt3187       2/18/2008 8:54:57 AM
Whilst having much sympathy for the majority Kosovar Albanians, and recognising that the MUP and VJ massively over reacted and were guilty of attrocities under Milosevic's direction, I don't fully agree with this. Serbia and Russia are quite right to point out that this could set a dangerous precident. To say that the situation 'has now moved on' since 2000 is just to acknowledge the success of the ethnic clensing operation conducted by the remnants of the UCK. I Iaven't been for some time now but, as I remember, the Russians exersize a large degree of control over access to the airport and Serbia controls many of the roads that would be needed to export and import marketable goods and services. The implications for the new, landlocked state, are obvious. Without EU aid and UN administration, the county is unviable as an economic entity. The government in Skopje is hardly a fan of the Shqiptre politico-mafia either and will hardly regard its 'new neighbour' favourably. Economically retarded Albania proper aside, I can't see many friends in the region that Thaci can relly on as he begins to build Kosovo's/ Kosova's future. Is this 'new state' not merely a de-facto EU/UN protectorate in all but name, probably aimed at appeasing the hardline Albanians, in the hope that this might promote stability and tolerance?
 
Quote    Reply

FJV       2/18/2008 1:00:43 PM
This is a pile of $h%t we would do well to avoid stepping in. Kosovo should have stuck to the agreements made. And if we're not carefull the we are gonna bleed for a war they started.



 
Quote    Reply

00_Chem_AJB       2/18/2008 6:20:05 PM
Let's just be thankful that Tadic won Serbia's presidential election, I remember reading the views of Serbian citizens on the future of Kosovo during the build up for the presidential elections: While most wanted Kosovo to remain part of Serbia; they gave the attitude of "if it does become independent then so what?" If this is the prevailing attitude then this may be a stable process, though with a very loud nationalistic presence and Russia playing hard ball, this could get unnecessarily messy. I still can't get my head around Europe calling Kosovo a special case, on what grounds? What makes them different to Chechnya or other minority areas wanting independence and why where they so eager for them to achieve independence? So is the EU going to babysit Kosovo forever? If not what will be the sustaining force for Kosovo's economy?
 
Quote    Reply

Plutarch       2/18/2008 7:07:34 PM

Let's just be thankful that Tadic won Serbia's presidential election, I remember reading the views of Serbian citizens on the future of Kosovo during the build up for the presidential elections: While most wanted Kosovo to remain part of Serbia; they gave the attitude of "if it does become independent then so what?" If this is the prevailing attitude then this may be a stable process, though with a very loud nationalistic presence and Russia playing hard ball, this could get unnecessarily messy. I still can't get my head around Europe calling Kosovo a special case, on what grounds? What makes them different to Chechnya or other minority areas wanting independence and why where they so eager for them to achieve independence? So is the EU going to babysit Kosovo forever? If not what will be the sustaining force for Kosovo's economy?


Well the Tadic government is on the record as opposing Kosovo independence, and have just recalled their ambassador to the US.  Also many thousands of Serbs are protesting the Kosovar move.  You cannot be any more clear than that, when it comes to intentions.  No military response, yet, because of NATO troop presence in the area.  Maybe there will never be a military response, but don't look for recognition anytime soon from the players that matter (Serbia, Russia, China, and thus the UN).  The EU itself is divided  on this issue.  The US/France/Germany/UK are leading the way on this, either because of collective guilt over failure to prevent genocide (though there was equal blame amongst all the parties in the Balkans), or to justify their disastrous intervention in 1999, or it is a harbinger of things to come where more ethnic minorities clamoring for homelands are recognized (scary thought since there are over one thousand state-less ethnic groups, many would like a state of their own).  I myself have a bone or two to pick with the English, or was that the Danes, or the Swedes, or the Germans, or the French,...you see where this all leads.
 
Quote    Reply

00_Chem_AJB       2/18/2008 7:32:56 PM
With US support for Kosovo independence I wound how this will play on the minds of the Iraqi Kurds.
 
Quote    Reply

trenchsol    Why is Kosovo different ?   2/19/2008 4:52:22 PM
I think that Kosovo is different from some other ethnic conflicts because government security forces took sides in the conflict 1999. They made no distinction between KLA they were after and Albanian civilians. Kosovo is probably similar to Darfur.

Could that be enough reason to grant independence for Kosovo Albanians or not, it depends on point of view. I am not going to comment on that, I am just trying to answer the question what makes Kosovo different.

DG


 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy