Article Archive: Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Weapons: M2A1 Heavy Machine-Gun
   Next Article → KOREA: It's All A Game
December 21, 2010: Starting this month, the U.S. Department of Defense has begun modifying (for $5,700 each) 6,000 M2HB 12.7mm (.50 caliber) machine-guns. The upgrade converts existing weapons to the M2A1 standard and allows for quick barrel changes. Each barrel weighs 10.9 kg/24 pounds. There is also a mounting rail for scopes and a flash suppressor and fixed headspace (which makes the weapons easier to use). Earlier this year, the Department of Defense also bought 8,000 more M2 machine-gun barrels (for $850 each). This M2A1 version is the latest upgrade for the M2 so far. Another 5,080 new M2A1 weapons will be manufactured.

It was two years ago that the U.S. Department of Defense gave General Dynamics $9 million to try and develop a lightweight .50 caliber (12.7mm) machine-gun (initially called LW50, then the XM806) that works. The LW50 is supposed to be ready for troops use until 2012. Designing and building a lighter and more effective 12.7mm machine-gun has been an elusive goal, and it's still not clear if the XM896 will pass muster with the troops.

An earlier attempt (the XM312) by General Dynamics did not work out so well. Actually, there are several other competitors for this project, and several failed attempts in the last few decades. The army wants a weapon that weighs about half as much as the current weapon (the 38 kg/84 pound M-2), has fewer parts, less recoil and is easier to maintain. Unfortunately, none of the proposed designs has solved the biggest problem with earlier attempts; low rate of fire.

The first attempt at creating a replacement for the current M2 .50 caliber (12.7mm) machine-gun did not succeed. Three years ago, field testing of the XM-312, the proposed replacement for the eighty year old, .50 caliber (12.7mm) M-2 machine-gun, began, in the United States and overseas. Then, nothing. That's because the test results were not encouraging, the biggest shortcoming being the low rate of fire (about 260 rounds per minute). This is about half the rate of the M2, and was believed adequate for the 25mm smart shells the XM312 was originally designed for (as the XM307). But for 12.7mm bullets, it didn't impress the troops. There were some reliability problems, which could be fixed. The rate-of-fire issue, however, has proved to be more difficult. Meanwhile, a new upgrade for the M2 has been fielded, and Ma Deuce still rules the battlefield.

The M-2, nicknamed "Ma Deuce" by the troops, has been around so long because it was very good at what it does. Accurate, reliable, rugged and easy to use, many of the M-2s currently in use are decades old, and finally wearing out. The army doesn't want to build new ones, and wasn't sure it could do without the venerable, and very useful, M2. So it ended up going ahead with the plan to build a new .50 caliber machine-gun (the XM312). Actually, this Ma Deuce replacement is basically the XM307, but without the ability to fire 25mm rounds. The XM312 weighs 36 pounds (compared to 50 for the M-2), even with the addition of the electronic fire control stuff from the XM307.

The LW50/XM806 will ignore the 25mm business, and probably borrow a lot of ideas from superior 12.7mm designs developed in other nations. That's because the LW50 won't be the first lightweight rival for the Ma Deuce replacement market. Buying a superior foreign replacement is difficult politically (although it is done), and there is also the feeling that the superior foreign weapons aren't as superior as they could be.

Actually, there have been many attempts to design a "new and improved" M2, and all have failed, to one degree or another, in one department or another. The basic problem is that the M2 is sturdy, reliable and gets the job done to the satisfaction of the users. The LW50 is apparently going to try and get around this by designing a better recoil system, and use modern electronic sights so that gunners can get more out of fewer bullets. Most combat veterans prefer the current rate of fire (7-8 bullets per second) to the slower (4 per second) one of the LW50. That attitude may change, as troops get to use the LW50 in combat. They may appreciate the ability to get more out of the same ammo supply, and deliver more accurate single shots and short bursts.

What the army is hoping to do with LW50 is not get an M2 replacement, but a "good enough" lightweight 12.7mm machine-gun, for those situations where such a weapon is needed. SOCOM (Special Operations Command), for example, has some lightweight vehicles in the works, that are too light to carry an M2, but could handle a lighter 12.7mm weapon. The army wants to have such a lightweight machine-gun for the troops in about two years. Meanwhile, the army plans to buy 40,000 new M2s.

Next Article → KOREA: It's All A Game
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
buzzard       12/21/2010 1:07:09 PM
John Browning was a genius. End of story.
 
Quote    Reply

heraldabc       12/22/2010 12:53:06 AM

John Browning was a genius. End of story.

M2A1 Heavy Machine-Gun

December 21, 2010: Starting this month, the U.S. Department of Defense has begun modifying (for $5,700 each) 6,000 M2HB 12.7mm (.50 caliber) machine-guns. The upgrade converts existing weapons to the "M2A1 standard and allows for quick barrel changes. Each barrel weighs 10.9 kg/24 pounds. There is also a mounting rail for scopes and a flash suppressor and fixed headspace (which makes the weapons easier to use). Earlier this year, the Department of Defense also bought 8,000 more M2 machine-gun barrels (for $850 each). This M2A1 version is the latest upgrade for the M2 so far. Another 5,080 new M2A1 weapons will be manufactured."
 
"The M-2, nicknamed "Ma Deuce" by the troops, has been around so long because it was very good at what it does. Accurate, reliable, rugged and easy to use, many of the M-2s currently in use are decades old, and finally wearing out. The army doesn't want to build new ones, and wasn't sure it could do without the venerable, and very useful, M2. So it ended up going ahead with the plan to build a new .50 caliber machine-gun (the XM312). Actually, this Ma Deuce replacement is basically the XM307, but without the ability to fire 25mm rounds. The XM312 weighs 36 pounds (compared to 50 for the M-2), even with the addition of the electronic fire control stuff from the XM307."
 
So much for not making new Browning M-2s.
 
Editorial review is kind of also indicated.  
 
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

davidhughes       12/22/2010 1:07:48 AM
All this praise for the .50 should be tempered by the realisation that there are plenty of equally good and several better (Russian in particular) HMG's around - for that matter around for many decades. Just because it is the only HMG used by Americans and British does not make it the best. As the article implies these endless minor upgrades of the Browning show once again the inability of the Army to override petty political platitudes.
 
And yes Browning was a genius.
 
Quote    Reply

achiever    Grammar and Spelling   12/22/2010 5:39:47 AM
Some articles need to re-read and adjusted as they have sloppy grammar and incorrect spelling.Use a dictionary and read for errors after writing your article.
 
Quote    Reply

doggtag       12/22/2010 7:55:35 AM

Some articles need to re-read and adjusted as they have sloppy grammar and incorrect spelling.Use a dictionary and read for errors after writing your article.


That's been a recurring theme here on this site since it started: there isn't any EDIT feature that lets us go back and correct grammar, spelling, or the eloquence of our posts (better choice of words, inflection on the right words, etc).
Only the keyholders here who can post the original SP articles (the SysOps Collective) have the power to go back and correct some of the original topic posts.
 
Sometimes it gets done (corrected, adjusted, or otherwise improved), sometimes not.
(Sometimes, I think it's intentionally done just to stir up conversation... http://www.strategypage.com/CuteSoft_Client/CuteEditor/Images/emsmilep.gif" align="absMiddle" border="0" alt="" />   )
 
Of course, the rebuttle you get, either public chastisement here or via someone sending you a private email,
is that if you don't like it, go somewhere else: this is generally a public forum, but there have to be rules adhered to if we are to expect order to be kept.
 
So the general rule of thumb is: proof-read and play nice.
 
Quote    Reply

Dave_in_Pa       12/22/2010 8:37:38 AM
" Another 5,080 new M2A1 weapons will be manufactured." ... "Meanwhile, the army has ordered 40,000 new M2s."
 
So, what does this mean?  A total of 45,080 new M2s have been ordered? 40,000 of which are the older, unimproved model, needing later upgrade to the A1 standard at the quoted cost of $5,700 each?  (which would total $228,000,000)
 
Quote    Reply

Tucci78    Increasing rate of fire   12/23/2010 8:16:47 PM
When the M2 machine gun was mounted on aircraft beginning before World War II, it was as the .50 AN/M2 version, with a rate of fire of about 800 rounds per minute.  There seems to be nothing intrinsic to the M2 design that holds it to the much lower ROF of the M2HB (500-600 RPM). 
 
During the Pacific war in particular, faster-firing aircraft machine guns in both .30 and .50 caliber were salvaged from wrecked fighters and attack planes by enterprising Marine and Army weapons specialists and adapted to ground use.  In many cases, these were called "stingers," and served satisfactorily in skilled hands despite their acknowledged tendencies to overheat. They were much admired for their performance during those target-rich opportunities provided by Banzai! charges. 
 
Quote    Reply

cwDeici       12/24/2010 2:32:48 PM
It can also be hard to get all your thoughts down into one post. So I take the consequences when failing it.
 
Anyway, yes the Browning rocks, but there are better guns out there. I'm glad they're not aiming for a replacement with just nine million dollars though. It takes a lot to improve on genious. 
Basically my feelings regarding the Browning is that while it is treated as a bit of a holy cow, like the M16, at least it deserves it.
 
Quote    Reply