NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Sea Transportation Article Index : Current 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

U.S. Army Builds Fast Ships

July 24, 2009: Last year, the U.S. Navy and the Army set up a deal where they would jointly buy a fleet of ten new Joint High Speed Vessels (JHSV) transports. These 320 foot long, $160 million ships are refined versions of the earlier HSV 2 ship. The army already has two of these HSV 2s, and the navy has one. The manufacturing of the JHSVs is being set up, by an Australian firm, in the U.S. The first JHSV won't be ready for another two years, although they will show up at six month intervals after that. But both the army and the navy are seeing a more urgent need for these ships.

All this began eight years ago, when the U.S. Navy began leasing a high speed (60 kilometers an hour) catamaran, the Westpac Express, from an Australian firm, to move U.S. Marine Corps equipment around the Pacific. In this it was very successful, and this has served to prove the ability of such a catamaran design to serve in a military role.

This led to a new class (HSV, or High Speed Vessel) of transport ships. In 2003, the navy leased an improved design, to further test the concept. The USS Swift (HSV 2), was a twin hulled catamaran, designed and built in Australia. Based on that very successful experience with the Westpac Express, many modifications were made and the Swift was built in ten months. The HSV is actually a small ship, 320 feet long and displaces 1900 tons. It can carry up to 800 tons of cargo and has airline style seating for 300 troops, although up to 600 can be carried. The cargo can include vehicles of up to 70 tons each, including M-1 tanks. Vehicles are driven on and off. There is a tradeoff between tonnage carried, and speed and range. The twin hull design is also slowed down quite a bit in rough seas. This is not the kind of ship you can use much in the north Atlantic or Pacific.

There is also a helicopter pad and space for two UH-60 or CH-46 class choppers. The basic crew is only 20, but there are crew quarters for 51 and the galley can feed up to 150. The important aspect of the HAV is speed. The Swift maintained a speed of 83 kilometers an hour for four hours during sea trails. The ship can cruise at 63 kilometers an hour for 2,000 kilometers, or 7,200 kilometers at 36 kilometers an hour before it has to be refueled. The HSV has four water-jets, making it very maneuverable. The Swift is going to be used mainly as a mine warfare support ship, but additional HSVs will serve as high speed transports. Weapons can include manned 25mm automatic cannon and remote controlled 12.7mm machine-gun or 40m grenade launchers. The HSV design is also being studied as the basis for a new class of coastal warships.

The army isn't new to owning its own transports. Back during World War II, the U.S. Army actually had a larger fleet (but only 1,225 seagoing ships), than the U.S. Navy, but one that was almost entirely support vessels. The navy had a larger tonnage of ships, about 12 million tons, compared to about 7 million for the army. Moreover, the navy had 6,228 seagoing ships, about half of them warships. The rest were support ships.

The big change after World War II was the loss of most of the amphibious ships (including most of the 140,000 small amphibious craft the army and navy used), and support ships. Increasingly, the navy used commercial shipping to move a lot of supplies around, and had a lot fewer support ships in general. This was largely because during World War II, the navy had maintained a huge fleet of warships (over a thousand) in the Pacific, almost entirely without ports for replenishing. This was an unprecedented operation, the likes of which will probably never be seen again. The navy also took over most of the army support ships (the two services had been feuding over the size of the army fleet ever since mid 19th century). But the army still has a need for some of its own ships, mainly for operating ports and amphibious beachheads. The army wants the JHSV for moving supplies and troops. The army likes to remind the navy, and the marines, that soldiers carried out more amphibious operations in the last century than the marines have, and are still ready to fight their way across a defended beach.

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article PROCUREMENT: How China Lost Pakistan


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

leesea    Errors about HSVs   7/25/2009 7:54:53 AM
This article has several factual errors and subjective comments.  First off the Army Navy and Marines established a JOINT project office at NAVSEA to acquire similar HSVs for each service.Next ten ships do NOT constitute a fleet.
 
The HSV-2 Swift is a chartered ship NOT a commission ship.   The Swift originally supported MINEWARCOM and NAVSPECWARCOM. BUT on its latest charter it is being used for transportation missiions primarily.  The Army had in the past contracted two HSVs, the Navy's Military Sealift Command has been chartering the WestPac Express for almost 8 years - none of those HSV are owned, they are all chartered ships owned by private US companies.  The JSHVs will be the first DOD owned HSVs.
 
All you details about engineering are mixed up and confusing.
 
The JHSVs will be built (not manufactured) at Austal USA a shipyard which has been building HSV for several years now, such as the Hawaii Super Ferrys and the Navy's Littoral Combat Ship.
 
GET your facts straight and leave out the opinions.
 

 
Quote    Reply

SCCOMarine       8/6/2009 12:30:50 PM
"All this began eight years ago, when the U.S. Navy began leasing a high speed (60 kilometers an hour) catamaran, the Westpac Express, from an Australian firm, to move U.S. Marine Corps equipment around the Pacific. In this it was very successful, and this has served to prove the ability of such a catamaran design to serve in a military role."
 
 
Not to knitpick but actually III MEF took this initiative on there own 1st.
 
It started w/ a Marine deployment to Australia called Tandem Thrust.  There the Marines took note of an Austal catamaran transiting cargo at high speeds every day & inquired about its speed and range.
 
Theorizing the ship could transit a 1,000+ member Marine BN & all its gear, including HE, about 1,000nm in less than 24hrs at a fraction of the price.  This was also a relatively shorter time compared with an airlift over the same distance due to the multiple trips, staging, etc. With the Austal ship they could stage prior to docking & roll right off.
 
This was then fowarded up the chain & approved by III MEF Cmdr who then made the request to the Navy.
 
The Navy REJECTED the request on the various grounds always used by those safe in there own box.
 
III MEF had to re-avert & scrounge up money to Charter the same Austal ship they had seen less than 6mths earlier on a 1yr lease, which the Navy joined 6mths later after finally seeing the potential being demonstrated by III MEF.
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy