NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Morale Article Index : Current 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Black Beret Blues

April 20, 2009: U.S. Army troops are becoming more energetic and vocal in efforts to get rid of the black beret they have been forced to wear for the past eight years. Back in 2000, the U.S. Army commander (Chief Of Staff) general Eric Shinseki ordered that the black beret replace the traditional billed cap (which had been used for nearly a century). Shinseki believed the black beret would be a symbol of excellence, reflecting the overall professionalism of the entire Army. He believed the black beret would repair the (largely nonexistent) divisions created by the use of different color berets in some units (red for airborne, green for special forces, black for rangers). Shinseki also believed that, because black berets are (everywhere but in the United States ) worn by armor troops, and in the U.S. by Rangers, the new headgear would reflect a merger of both light and heavy forces. This was a non-issue to most troops. Shinseki also insisted that selecting the color black was not intended as an insult to the Rangers (who were, and still believe that this was exactly what was intended) but was simply the best color to match the battle dress uniform (BDU). This, despite the fact that there is no longer any black in the BDU. Shinseki also wanted to create a "world class uniform" that would be respected by foreigners who came into contact with US troops. But American troops associate the beret with armies that tend to lose (especially the French) and consider it no great honor.

Then there are practical issues. The beret is made of wool, and requires more care to keep it presentable. Even at that, no one can agree on exactly how one should wear it. The damn thing is made of wool, and is uncomfortable in warm weather. Since it has no bill, it provides no shade for the eyes when troops have to stand in formation. It also costs twice as much as the patrol cap (the baseball cap live headgear, that is the same pattern as the BDU and is soft and light). But for many formations and occasions, the troops must wear the beret, instead of the patrol cap. Most troops would prefer to use the patrol cap, in camo or monotone versions, instead of the beret.

From the beginning, the black beret was very unpopular. Surveys quickly revealed that the majority of the troops were hostile to the head gear change. But Shinsheki went forward anyway. Current and former rangers, and many members of Congress, appealed to president Bush to reverse the policy back then. But September 11, 2001 came along before Bush could do anything, and the beret issue has been pushed into the background ever since.

But now the troops feel they have won one war, and are on their way to winning another, and would like to get some relief from those damn, stupid berets.

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article PROCUREMENT: Rafale Humiliated


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Pages: 1 2
Rick9719       4/20/2009 7:53:04 AM

What about the forage cap?  An updated version of the old American Civil War hat would look more military and have a brim.  I know you can make cheap ones because I bought one down in Gettysburg. 

 
Quote    Reply

billr    What about the blue uniform   4/20/2009 11:51:38 AM
If the troops don't like the beret, they hate the new blue Class A and B uniforms.  The Army has taken a fairly nice looking dress uniform (still not as nice as the Marine dress blues, but nice) and made the troops look like they are in a comic opera.  My son, who just got out of the Army, said he was glad he got out before he had to ware that hideous uniform.
 
Quote    Reply

sjdoc    The patrol cap   4/20/2009 12:29:17 PM
--
The BDU patrol cap is a wholly practical, wholly American approach to uniform wear, reflecting the nation's respect for functionality and efficiency.  The standard-issue black beret, on the other hand, is like nothing an American citizen would ever wear under any circumstances.  It is neither warm enough for winter throughout most of our country, comfortable in summer anywhere in our country, nor compatible with any culture in this nation, transplanted or home-grown. 
 
As a mark of distinction for certain units - Special Forces and perhaps Airborne and Ranger regiments - the beret serves as notice that these are unconventional warfare "shooters" and not people whom the chairborne should ever be allowed to screw with.  Sadly enough, that's an absolute necessity, as witness the efforts of the anal-retentive ring knockers at the Pentagon to get the Special Forces people (who were working so successfully in Afghanistan ) to shave when the appearance of a clean-shaven face in that part of the world is a sign of contemptible effeminacy.  Might as well have ordered 'em to mince around with lavender hankies poking out of their hip pockets.  God protect America from Regular Army idiots.
 
But for all the reasons mentioned in the article and immediately above, Shinseki's black beret is a Major Bad Idea.  I would suggest not only the abolition of these damned things but also ceremonial bonfires into which the troops can throw them.  Talk about a morale-boosting measure....
--
 
Quote    Reply

NiteShade       4/21/2009 12:28:33 AM
I think that Gen Shinseki was attempting to improve morale among non-airborne folks with the new beret. Airborne guys used to laugh at our patrol caps, strutted around in their maroon colored berets, mocked our low-quarter shoes when in dress uniform (while they got to wear jump boots). Shinseki was conveying the message that all troops were valuable, not just the elites.  And the funny thing was that I ran into folks who had washed out of jump school, yet still got to wear the airborn uniform, and still got to look down on us legs.
 
Quote    Reply

stbretnco       4/21/2009 1:38:34 AM
Gen. Shinseki's decision about the berets was pounded in the ranks. The division commander of the unit I was in had to go as far as to issue orders that the patrol caps were not to be worn at any time in garrison. They are a useless piece of crap, and should go into the trash bin.
 
As far as morale goes, if you want to wear a beret, the slots are available. If you need a beret to make yourself feel good, your issues are far deeper than what you're wearing on your head.
 
Quote    Reply

stbretnco       4/21/2009 1:40:06 AM
Can we please get some sort of edit function here??????
 
 
Edit:
 
The Berets are a useless piece of crap, and should go into the trash bin.
 
Quote    Reply

Mike From Brielle    I am not   4/21/2009 11:15:42 AM
a fan of the berret but I also think General Shinseki is a national hero.  During the late 90's with a much lower share of a far less generous defense budget than what the Army and DoD has now General Shinseki made the changes to the C4ISR infrastructure of the Army that has now made it the world standard in this area and enabled it fight the wars on Afghanistan and Iraq as succesfully as it did with far less troops than here to for would have been considered prudent.  The General did this with a small fraction of the funds made available to other "TRANSFORMATIONAL" programs in about four years.  Rummsfeld and his lakey's (and I used to be a Rummsfeld fan) programs  are still trying to see the light of day and the  "reforms" will probably set back acquisistion a couple of generations but if your connected they'll be great.   In fact if you take a close look at these transformational programs you'll find that their current iterations are based largly on the work that General Shinseki insisted on.  The General was constantly checking up on the status of Task Force XXI and held course when other people would have given up after early failures.  He plainly spoke his proffessional opinion when asked a straight forward question in regard to the number of troops needed to accomplish the missions he and his Army was to be tasked.  He did not embelish his answers with caveats projecting perceived advances when these had not yet been proven out in combat.  But everything he did was pointed at doing far more with far less resources (it was the only thing he could do during the Clinton years).  General Shinseki set a standard for honor. 
I know there are people who will try to tarnish his image with supposed scandals in regard to the Stryker program but I think even these people now will avoid the Stryker issue regarding how succesful the vehicle has been in combat.
 
Quote    Reply

NiteShade       4/22/2009 12:01:01 AM
<i>"As far as morale goes, if you want to wear a beret, the slots are available. If you need a beret to make yourself feel good, your issues are far deeper than what you're wearing on your head."</i>
 
**
 
Slots are available? Not for me since I've been out of the military for 25 years. And don't worry about my issues, it may be that you have some of your own which we won't get into. I am just describing how things are/were at posts that are predominantly airborne units. If you never served under such circumstances then you don't know. At any rate, Gen Shinseki's intentions were good, IMHO.
 
Quote    Reply

stbretnco       4/22/2009 12:17:41 AM
Given all the money wasted on the berets, it was a truly regrettable decision. Also add in the fact that it's a PITA to train a soldier on properly prepping, shaping, and wearing the damned things, which takes away from eminently more useful training. It takes about 30 seconds to show a soldier how to wear a patrol cap.
 
I'm now retired, was in for 20+years, and was in a few situations where I was working with soldiers who were on jump status.
 
I never had any issues with them strutting, they had a qualification I didn't, and if I wanted it I could have gotten it. I just never felt any burning urge to jump out of a perfectly good aircraft.
 
Airborne troops, rangers, and SF soldiers deserve the distinction the berets give them. They've earned it. Give the regular troops the patrol caps, quit wasting money on berets, and give the elite soldiers the distinction they deserve.
 
Quote    Reply

NiteShade       4/22/2009 2:00:13 AM
 
Well I would say that working with some soldiers who are on jump status is not the same thing as serving with an airborne division that, from top to bottom, is full of juice, and let's you know every day that you are not one of them. But I will agree that the cap is much more practical. 
 
Quote    Reply

oldguy    Shinseki's Revenge   4/22/2009 9:29:13 PM
Shinseki was an armor officer back in the days when US armor wore a black beret.  RUMINT from a reliable source in a position to know (served with Shinseki at the time) is that then MAJ Shinseki was just almightily pissed off when the CoS of the Army, Gen "Shy" Meyer change the rules, eliminating all but the green and maroon berets.  Just as well, we were comtemplating an oriental blue beret for the MI branch.  Makes me shudder to remember that.
 
Old Chief
 
Quote    Reply

stbretnco       4/23/2009 1:20:59 AM
Better Oriental Blue than the purdy Signal Orange that Signal troops almost got shafted with.
 
Quote    Reply

Mike From Brielle    Old Guy    4/24/2009 9:34:11 AM

Once upon a time in Arlington Hall they had to wear not only the blue beret but also a pretty blue ascot with bloused boots when standing watches.

 
Quote    Reply

Photon       4/25/2009 3:52:48 PM
I think our troops look just fine in their camo + billed or boonie hat, even on parades.  (Personally, I find dress uniforms look rather goofy, compared to combat uniforms, even on parades.)  I think this sort of 'utilitarian style' fits quite well with the 'psyche' of the US Armed Forces.
 
I think this issue over dress uniform is not uncommon throughout most top brasses.  You can say the same thing about the Soviet/Russian Army throughout the decades.  (OMFG ... how many times they have changed uniforms?!?  Even worse than the US military!)
 
Quote    Reply

Biglar1    Didn't Shinseki also...   4/27/2009 10:51:34 AM
give us that fabulous advertisement "An Army of One"?  The first thing I thought when I heard it was "WTF?"  Years of team oriented training and now an ad campaign about individuals (at least percieved that way) not teamwork?
 
Then there was the elimination of the SDT (Skin Development Test) that replaced the SQT (Skin Qualification Test).  The SDT was a good idea that gave the Army a feel for how well trained NCO's were.  The average scores were low...I mean, really LOW.  Second time I took it I scored an 89 and was in the 93 percentile.  So big army's fix was to just do away with the test.
 
Compaired to the blunders under Shinseki the transformation (something that is barely visible) has been overshadowed.  After all, we were still training to fight WWIII and not looking to future threats under his leadership.  And did he put up any arguement against Pres. Obama's plan to drop wounded vets from VA medical coverage?
 
Bottom line is make the beret a part of the class A/B uniform only and give us back the patrol cap cuz that black rag stinks down here in the Florida sun and rain.
 
Quote    Reply
Pages: 1 2





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy