NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Infantry Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

The 21st Century Helmet

July 30, 2009: The Netherlands is developing an advanced modular combat helmet for issue to its soldiers as part of a comprehensive program called Project Voss  ("Improved Operational Soldiers’ System"), a counterpart to the U.S Land Warrior system.                    Known as ‘Galea’, (Roman for helmet,) the design features a standard aramid (Kevlar) shell with an improved fit, more protection, and at half the weight (1100 grams, or 2.4 pounds) of the current helmet, which has been in use since the 1990’s. Among its innovations are detachable side panels, allowing the wearing of communication equipment, and attachable ear, neck, and jaw pieces enabling complete coverage for the face while cancelling out high sound levels. Other features include an ergonomic mount for Night Vision Devices with the possibility of an air conditioning system when utilizing the complete coverage option.

Modularity features of the helmet came after a survey of 500 soldiers. The troops requested an ability to wear hearing as well as eye protection even if not wearing a helmet. As an extra benefit, when patrolling in populated areas the removal of panels enable the helmet to attain a ‘less aggressive’ shape, providing a more sympathetic silhouette without intimidating the local civilians.

So innovative is the design that it recently received an award for such at a trade show in Prague, Czechoslovakia. Yet, the Dutch will continue to seek improvements as testing continues. If all trials successful, the helmet will be issued service wide to the Dutch Army in 2011.

The United States has a similar albeit less advanced design called the F.A.S.T. (Future Assault Shell Technology) helmet in use by Special Operations. -- Mike Perry

 

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article MURPHY'S LAW: Eternal Joy


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

FJV       7/30/2009 1:27:36 PM
 
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Whispering Death       7/30/2009 4:09:26 PM

Do these pannels do anything besides "look cool"?  What's the point of a helmet anyway when pretty much any round fired in combat will penetrate it right through.

 
Quote    Reply

C3I2       7/30/2009 4:26:21 PM

Do these pannels do anything besides "look cool"?  What's the point of a helmet anyway when pretty much any round fired in combat will penetrate it right through.



It looks extraordinary cool. Only thing to make it look better would be a pattern on the 'cheek guard' think Vader or a Skull! I'm sure you will get a designated protection level soon enough if not already; a helmet that is actually worn (correctly) and protects from smaller fragments etc. also would have its place mind you.
 
Quote    Reply

Gerry       7/30/2009 9:22:48 PM

Do these pannels do anything besides "look cool"?  What's the point of a helmet anyway when pretty much any round fired in combat will penetrate it right through.

Can't think of any helmet that will stop a direct hit. Indirect ,as most are, will be deflected as well as ricochets and shrapnel from exploding grenades or RPGs.  Not to mention bits of rock, cement blocks and many other bits of flying matter. The new helmet offers much needed protections, comfortably, over a larger area as needed.
 
Quote    Reply

Whispering Death       7/30/2009 10:32:10 PM
It would be interesting to see some statistical reserch done on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars to try to determine how many brain injuries were stopped by use of helmets.  I haven't seen much evidence they do a hell of a lot of good.  Seems like when you see pictures of the special forces units that have the flexibility to pick their own gear in the field, they tend to lose the helmet many times in favor of more heat/weight saving head garments like a simple hat.  The most arguments you get in favor of helmets tend to be focused on the "psychological edge" it gives the wearer.  But if that's the case wouldn't it be a lot more cost effective to just have the soldiers wear Affliction T-shirts over their body armor?  hahaha
 
Quote    Reply

C3I2       7/31/2009 4:31:59 AM

It would be interesting to see some statistical reserch done on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars to try to determine how many brain injuries were stopped by use of helmets.  I haven't seen much evidence they do a hell of a lot of good.  Seems like when you see pictures of the special forces units that have the flexibility to pick their own gear in the field, they tend to lose the helmet many times in favor of more heat/weight saving head garments like a simple hat.  The most arguments you get in favor of helmets tend to be focused on the "psychological edge" it gives the wearer.  But if that's the case wouldn't it be a lot more cost effective to just have the soldiers wear Affliction T-shirts over their body armor?  hahaha
Given the amount of just plain injuries over there, they probably stopped quite a lot. Or, to take a civilian example, nobody is shooting at me but I would be extraordinary stupid if I rode my MC without my own helmet. It would be interesting to know how many more modern adaptions they have copied from recent MC helmet models, in regards to ventilation and how to adjust the helmets fit (as heads are invariable of different shapes) mainly.
 
Quote    Reply

stbretnco       7/31/2009 5:21:16 AM
Helmets do far more than "look cool". The kevlar pot (1st Gen) in the infantry museum from Grenada with a 7.62X39 bullet sticking out of it is proof of that.
 
 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345    Heat Burden   7/31/2009 5:59:03 AM
The head is a primary heat radiator of the Human animal. Cover up all that surface area with an insulator like a bullet stopper and watch the number of heat casualties escalate.
 
 Herald
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

broadswordsman    Broadswordsman   7/31/2009 12:02:08 PM
I would be curious to see the helmet with side cut outs.  As a structural engineer I can say a great deal of the fragment resisting capability of the helmet comes from it's arching and continuity qualities.  With large cut outs you loose a significant amount of it's strength.  I think this is probably a bad idea.  Better to have the helmet large enough to house these components inside the shell.
 
Quote    Reply

FJV       7/31/2009 12:06:29 PM
For  desert warfare certainly a problem.
For other areas (arctic) might be a benefit.
 
 
 

 
Quote    Reply

FJV    PS   7/31/2009 12:08:13 PM
Insulation might also be beneficial for the IR emissions of the soldier.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Sty0pa       7/31/2009 1:08:40 PM

"The head is a primary heat radiator of the Human animal. Cover up all that surface area with an insulator like a bullet stopper and watch the number of heat casualties escalate. "
 
Primary?  Eh...not so much. This old trope is also stated by every mother: "Put a hat on, you lose 90% of your heat through your head".
 
Of course, this is only true when everything else is covered.
 
Think about it - if you lost 90% of your body heat via your head, you could wear a terrific cap and go otherwise comfortably naked in winter.
 
link (human male, in infrared).
The densest region of emitted body heat is radiated the human neck (specifically, the sides below the jawline).
 
In reality, and discounting obesity which can significantly change heat pictures on an individual level, the greatest 'radiative' total (heat * surface area) is your torso.  Further, blood exchange and the ability to MOVE heat from the core to the surface is significantly higher in the chest/arms than in anything outside the skull.
 


 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345       7/31/2009 7:53:10 PM
"The head is a primary heat radiator of the Human animal. Cover up all that surface area with an insulator like a bullet stopper and watch the number of heat casualties escalate. "
 
Primary?  Eh...not so much. This old trope is also stated by every mother: "Put a hat on, you lose 90% of your heat through your head".
 
Of course, this is only true when everything else is covered.
 
Think about it - if you lost 90% of your body heat via your head, you could wear a terrific cap and go otherwise comfortably naked in winter.
 
link target="_blank">link (human male, in infrared).
The densest region of emitted body heat is radiated the human neck (specifically, the sides below the jawline).
 
Hair is an insulator. 

In reality, and discounting obesity which can significantly change heat pictures on an individual level, the greatest 'radiative' total (heat * surface area) is your torso.(armpits)  Further, blood exchange and the ability to MOVE heat from the core to the surface is significantly higher in the chest/arms (nether regions) than in anything outside the skull.
 
The extremities are the radiators when you are clothed. That bowling ball sized sphere on your shoulders is a big one.

 
Herald
 
 
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy