NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Strategic Weapons Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Arrow Fails Off California Coast

July 24, 2009: Israel tested its new Arrow II anti-missile system off the West coast of the United States, and the test failed. It was described as a communications problem with the interceptor vehicle. Actually, there were three failures in a week of tests. The practice warhead was provided by a target missile dropped from a C-17 transport.

The two ton Arrow I is being replaced with the 1.3 ton Arrow II, which can shoot down longer range (1,100 kilometers or more) ballistic missiles fired from Iran. Israel is currently developing and testing an upgraded Arrow II, and one failed test won't halt the program. The test has to be done off the U.S. west coast because that was the only facility available to Israel for testing such a system, that requires longer range target missiles for a realistic and meaningful result.

To further complicate matters, the U.S. wants to withdraw its support for development of the Arrow system. About half the $2 billion cost of developing Arrow has come from the United States. In addition, American firms have done some of the development work, or contributed technology. The U.S. wants to cut the several hundred million dollars it would be spending on future Arrow development, in order to save money, and allocate more resources to U.S. anti-missile systems (Aegis SM-3, THAAD and GBI). American support of Arrow was originally sort of an insurance policy, in case similar U.S. effort didn't work out. But now the U.S. is having second thoughts about cutting Arrow support, because they believe that Israel might be less likely to launch an air strike on Iranian nuclear development sites, if there were a dependable anti-missile system available to stop such Iranian missiles.

Israel has two batteries of Arrow I, and over a hundred missiles available. An Arrow battery has 4-8 launchers, and each launcher carries six missiles in containers. The Arrow was developed to knock down Scud type missiles fired from Syria, Saudi Arabia or Iraq. The U.S. has provided Israel with a mobile X-band radar that enables it to detect incoming ballistic missiles father away. Currently, the Israeli Green Pine radar can only detect a ballistic missile fired from Iran when the missile warhead is about two minutes from hitting a target in Israel. The X-band radar  allows the Iranian missile to be spotted when it was 5-6 minutes away, enabling the Israeli Arrow anti-missile missile to hit the Iranian warhead farther away and with greater certainty. Israel also wants to buy a land based version of the Aegis anti-missile missile.

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article IRAQ: The Importance Of Looking Good


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

RtWingCon    sound logic??   7/25/2009 2:20:13 AM
  "But now the U.S. is having second thoughts about cutting Arrow support, because they believe that Israel might be less likely to launch an air strike on Iranian nuclear development sites, if there were a dependable anti-missile system available to stop such Iranian missiles. "  
 
    
I would think the Arrow System provided insurance, not an alternative to a nuclear Iran. Judging from Iran's presidents comments, lobbing nuclear missles at Israel isn't an if but a when. Why then would Israel be less likely to launch a pre-emptive strike? Dumb logic. If the neighbors dog is rabid you don't build a higher fence, you shoot the dog.                                                                                                  
 
Quote    Reply

mabie       9/26/2009 9:09:30 AM
It would appear that the US is subsidiing Israel's defense industry in the case of the Arrow when it would be so much simpler for the Israelis to buy a turnkey US missile system.. the US missiles have been having impressive test results the past several years. maybe the US doesn't want to share some of the tech ..
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       9/27/2009 3:32:26 AM

It would appear that the US is subsidiing Israel's defense industry in the case of the Arrow when it would be so much simpler for the Israelis to buy a turnkey US missile system.. the US missiles have been having impressive test results the past several years. maybe the US doesn't want to share some of the tech ..

The Israelis have a shorter development cycle than the US (probably something to do with being, literally, under the gun), but less resources.  They are also not shy about fielding prototypes to see how they work in combat.  The US buys into a lot of their technology development work to get access to the research results, but does not participate at the production level.
 
Israel is apparently interested in acquiring a land based version of the Aegis system, but are definitely thinking in terms of a 'layered defense'.  They also do not want to be tied logistically to another country, even the US, because of past experiences with embargoes for political purposes.  And that was before Obama's recent speeches.
 
Quote    Reply

mabie       9/30/2009 1:31:23 AM
I can see how the threat of an embargo would worry Israel though these are defensive systems so maybe not as liable to be embargoed. Didn't the US get involved with Arrow years back when ABM work was outlawed by treaty.. gave the US a nice loophole to work on the tech and plow whatever info they learned back into US programs later on. Anyway, as the US has proven, it takes a lot of resources (money and people) to get something this sophistiocated right.. withess the stunning success of the US ABM systems of late.. maybe Israel just doesn't have the capability/resources to get this thing working and produce a long series of successful tests before putting a system into the field. So too bad the US doesn't stand to learn much more from participation in Arrow and money is in short supply.
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy