NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Strategic Weapons Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Bulava Or Bust

March 9, 2009: Despite the new Russian Bulava SLBM (Sea Launched Ballistic Missile) having failed five of its ten test launches, it was recently announced that the Bulava would enter service this year, and that there would be five or more test firings to help make that happen. The Russian engineers believe they have identified the sources of the problems. And, apparently in line with centuries old tradition, word has come down from the top that this has to happen, or else.  

The Russians have always been confident in the basic technology of the Bulava. They knew there would be test failures, and believed they were facing no more problems that the two most recent U.S. SLBMs. These had had a 13 percent (23 tests of the Trident I) and two percent (49 tests of Trident II) failure rate. What did make many Russians nervous was the fact that the Bulava is replacement for an earlier SLBM that had to be cancelled during development because of too many test failures, and too many design and equipment problems that could not be fixed. Thus the Bulava is basically a navalized version of the successful Topol land based ICBM. The reliability of the Topol is the primary reason the Russians moved forward with Bulava, and remain confident that they can make it work, eventually.

The Bulava will equip the new Borei class SSBN (nuclear powered ballistic missile submarine). The first one is has just entered service. The Borei class boats will replace the aging Cold War era SSBNs, which are being retired because of safety and reliability issues, and the high expense of running them. Nuclear submarines are one area of military spending that did not get cut back sharply after the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991.

The 45 ton Bulava SLBM is a little shorter than the Topol M, so that it could fit into the subs missile tubes. Thus Bulava has a shorter range (8,000 kilometers) than Topol. Bulava has three stages and uses solid fuel. Currently, each Bulava is believed configured to carry ten 150 kiloton warheads. The warhead is also shielded to provide protection from the electronic pulse of nearby nuclear explosions. The Bulava could also carry one 500 kiloton nuclear warhead, plus decoys. Many Russians are obsessed with trying to defeat American anti-missile systems.

Russian doubts about Bulava are consistent with long time problems with their submarine launched ballistic missiles. These problems were largely kept secret during the Cold War, but since then, more information has emerged. Apparently the Russians want to get a few working Bulavas to sea in the first of their new Borei class boats, that was recently commissioned.

 

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article LEADERSHIP: Know When You Are


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Tincanman    Bulava or Bust.....   3/9/2009 1:25:49 PM
Since the new Russian SSBM is still sitting at the pier "waiting" until the ice melts, I wonder if the Bulava will sit and wait
as well. So far, the new boomer, the Yuri D. the sub which will launch the missile is untried....and the missile's not successful enough to be sent to sea as a deterrent......That will not stop the Russians, it didn't years ago, nothing's changed. This is all a rerun of the Cold War scenario. The theory that bad subs and bad missiles are better than no subs and no missiles......The seagoing version of the T-72 main battle tank, except that the Russian submariners can be a little taller than the Russian tank crews.....Putin is a used car salesman, and Russia will be buying more shoddy goods. I feel sorry for the Russian people, they deserve better.
Tincanman
 
Quote    Reply

razputin    reply to Tincanman    3/9/2009 3:11:33 PM
Stop propagating the myth that T-72 requires midgets to operate it... I have relatives who were T-72/80 tank commanders and gunners and they are no midgets for sure. The shortest  one of them is 178-180cm tall which can hardly be called short. The biggest complaint I ever heard from them was noise inside. Other than that they loved it for firepower mobility and agility. Not exactly a western MBT but it was never meant to be. It was never meant to be a Tiger, Abrams, or Leopard or whatever supposed western counterpart.  
 
Quote    Reply

razputin    reply to Tincanman    3/9/2009 3:27:21 PM
And more on topic... Given what an absoulte disaster the collapse of the soviet union was and the political/economic collapse that followed it is a miracle Russia was able to produce Borei which is not a Soviet but really a Russian boomer design. It is a miracle the damn thing floats and if it proves operational and the Bulava's problems are finally solved then it will ultimately be a coup. We have a saying in Russia that goes smth like this: "Mold a bullet out sh*t/dirt" And that is exactly what we accomplished here. 

The problems with Bulava stem largely from the fact that the institute that took on the Bulava design/development has never had to produce a sea launched missile. The requirements are obviously diifferent from the ground launched missiles and the people involved were learning on the go and again with some top engineers making less than a $1000 a month if that when they initially started working on it.
 
Btw the article is implying that people at NIIs are being threatened with "you either do it or else." That is a load of bull. What is happeneing is that over the last 10 years the conditions for scientists have greatly improved and many people are offered some very attractive financial packages. The only way you can end up with lead in your diet is if you decide to let the chinese or the west in on some secret details. But even then you probably end up in some remote siberian colony rather than die from polonium poisoning or shot to the back of the head unless you really messed up. If you keep your mouth shot and do your work properly you are rewarded handsomely.
 
Quote    Reply

stbretnco    And Bulava fails again   7/17/2009 3:10:56 AM
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Berova       7/17/2009 4:58:17 AM
Man, heads are gonna roll... again!
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy