NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Strategic Weapons Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Scary Becomes Fashionable Again

December 18, 2008: For the second time the last two months, one of the U.S. Air Forces Missile Wings has flunked a nuclear weapons safety inspection. This month it was the 90th Missile Wing at Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming. Last month it was the 341st Missile Wing at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana. Each of these wings controls a third of the 450 American Minuteman III ICBMs.

These two week long inspections take place every 18 months. Because of  the embarrassing problems with nuclear weapons security over the last two years, these inspections have become more strict. Since no one was removed from their jobs at the 341st or the 90th as a result of the inspection results, it appears that this was all meant to get everyone to tighten up and go by the book. Scary inspections have become fashionable again, and commanders who don't get with the program are headed for early retirement.

These inspections are not unique or a surprise. Both of these units have been where they are for over four decades. The word comes down the chain of command about what is expected, and if anyone screws up, officers (or, more rarely, NCOs) are relieved and careers are ruined. Heads did not roll for these inspection failures. These failures were for instructional purposes only. The word from on-high is that the units handling nuclear weapons have to be over-the-top fanatic about nuclear safety and security. This is a switch from recent practices.

This heralds the return of the old SAC (Strategic Air Command) attitude. The U.S. Air Force is in the process of trying to revive SAC. This is one of those rare cases where it is recognized that the Good Old Days were better. Or, in this case, meaner, tougher, more effective and safer. The new Global Strike Command (GSC) will, as SAC once did, control all air force nuclear weapons and delivery systems (ICBMs and heavy bombers.) This comes sixteen years of trying to do without SAC.

In 1992, SAC, which had control of air force nuclear bombers and missiles since 1946, was disbanded and the ICBMs, and their crews, were transferred to the new Space Command. SAC had long been the butt of many jokes, for being uptight and fanatical about security and discipline. Everyone tolerated this because, after all, SAC had charge of all those nukes, heavy bombers and ICBMs. When Space Command took over, they eased up on the tight discipline and strictness about procedure that had been the hallmark of SAC for decades. The old timers complained, but many of the young troops liked the new, looser, attitudes.

Officers operating the ICBMs were no longer career "missileers", but Space Command people. Time that used to be spent on studying nuclear weapons security and missile maintenance issues, was now devoted to subjects of more concern to Space Command (satellites and communications, for example). Standards fell, efficiency slipped. Then in 2005, the missile crews lost their Missile Badge, and had it replaced with a generic Space Command badge. Then, a year ago, there was much angst when it was discovered that six nuclear cruise missiles had accidentally been mounted on a B-52 and flown halfway across the country. How could this happen? The old timers knew. While many of these older officers and NCOs were pleased when SAC went away early in their careers, they knew that it was that act, and the subsequent "loosening up", that led to the lax attitudes that put those six nukes on that B-52. All this was part of a major, post-Cold War reorganization of the USAF. It was the beginning of the end of a decades old tradition of handling nuclear weapons safely and securely.

Last Summer, the air force brass reinstated the Missile Badge, for any missile crew member who belonged to a missile crew that was certified CMR (passed some strenuous inspections to be declared Combat Mission Ready). The badge was used for decades, until 2005, when it was withdrawn and replaced by the generic "Space Wings" of the USAF Space Command, which took control of the ICBMs in 1993. SAC, it turns out, has been coming back quietly for quite some time.

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article PROCUREMENT: Iraq Buys What It Knows


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

sjdoc    How's the Navy doing?   12/18/2008 8:59:44 AM
--
The U.S. Navy also has contol of nuclear weapons. Have they had any problems with security issues similar to those presently afflicting the Air Force?
 
--
 
Quote    Reply

Dave_in_Pa       12/18/2008 2:34:24 PM
I was a USAF enlisted man in a SAC B-52 wing in the 1970's.  I can assure from my experiences that in those times, SAC took the safety and security of nuclear weapons, anything connected with nuclear weapons, really seriously. SAC ran a very taut ship.
 
I was appalled to read of the nuke cruise missile incident.  Such mind-boggling laxity of security would simply not have happened in the good old days. Inconceivable!
 
People were properly trained. And re-trained.  And refresher-trained. SAC went by the book on nuke safety and security.  Exercises and inspections (the annual -not every 18 months- Operational Readiness Inspection, or ORI, was the much dreaded and prepared for big inspection from the SAC Inspector General's office) ensured that this was the only accepted state of affairs. 
 
God have mercy on any wing commander, base commander, squadron commander, shop NCOIC, whatever, who's area of responsibility failed it's part of an ORI, because the Air Force wouldn't have any.  Any officer or NCO who's area of responsibility failed an ORI might as well immediately start planning his/her civilian life and looking for a civilian job, because his/her Air Force career just got lopped off at the knees.
 
I think we can't afford to have anything but such a strict and unforgiving ethos in any part of the military having anything to do with nuclear weapons. The potential consequences could be unthinkable.

 
Quote    Reply

Poole    SAC is back   12/18/2008 10:14:22 PM
Somewhere, General LeMay is smiling.
 
Quote    Reply

united68       12/18/2008 10:55:17 PM
Good ole SAC, I was part of SAC back in the late 80's and early 90's and it was no joke. I understood why it had tough security policies but somethings I thought were somewhat nit picky on the non-security stuff. It needs to be that way again.
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       12/20/2008 4:46:06 AM

The U.S. Navy also has control of nuclear weapons. Have they had any problems with security issues similar to those presently afflicting the Air Force?

While we cannot know for sure, it is likely that the only nuclear weapons left in the Navy are SSBN's.  They never slacked off like the Air Force, in part because they operate in an environment where failure to maintain a fanatical attention to detail can result in mass fatalities (i.e. loss of the vessel).  The deep ocean is much less forgiving than the air, or the enemy.
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy