NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Strategic Weapons Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Failure Is An Option

November 21, 2008: The U.S. 341st Missile Wing at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana, which controls a third of the 450 American Minuteman III ICBMs, failed a recent inspection of its ability to safeguard its nuclear weapons. This was a two week long inspection that takes place once every 18 months. Since the problems with nuclear weapons security over the last two years, these inspections have become more strict. Since no one was removed from their jobs at the 341st as a result of the inspection results, it appears that this was all meant to get everyone to tighten up and go by the book.

This also appears to herald the return of the old SAC (Strategic Air Command) attitude  as well. The U.S. Air Force is in the process of trying to revive SAC. This is one of those rare cases where it is recognized that the Good Old Days were better. The new Global Strike Command (GSC) will, as SAC once did, control all air force nuclear weapons and delivery systems (ICBMs and heavy bombers.) This comes sixteen years of trying to do without SAC.

In 1992, SAC, which had control of air force nuclear bombers and missiles since 1946, was disbanded and the ICBMs, and their crews, were transferred to the new Space Command. SAC had long been the butt of many jokes, for being uptight and fanatical about security and discipline. Everyone tolerated this because, after all, SAC had charge of all those nukes, heavy bombers and ICBMs. When Space Command took over, they eased up on the tight discipline and strictness about procedure that had been the hallmark of SAC for decades. The old timers complained, but many of the young troops liked the new, looser, attitudes.

Officers operating the ICBMs were no longer career "missileers", but Space Command people. Time that used to be spent on studying nuclear weapons security and missile maintenance issues, was now devoted to subjects of more concern to Space Command (satellites and communications, for example). Standards fell, efficiency slipped. Then in 2005, the missile crews lost their Missile Badge, and had it replaced with a generic Space Command badge. Then, a year ago, there was much angst when it was discovered that six nuclear cruise missiles had accidentally been mounted on a B-52 and flown halfway across the country. How could this happen? The old timers knew. While many of these older officers and NCOs were pleased when SAC went away early in their careers, they knew that it was that act, and the subsequent "loosening up", that led to the lax attitudes that put those six nukes on that B-52.

All this was part of a major, post-Cold War reorganization of the USAF. It was the beginning of the end of a decades old tradition of handling nuclear weapons safely and securely.

Last Summer, the air force brass reinstated the Missile Badge, for any missile crew member who belonged to a missile crew that was certified CMR (passed some strenuous inspections to be declared Combat Mission Ready). The badge was used for decades, until 2005, when it was withdrawn and replaced by the generic "Space Wings" of the USAF Space Command, which took control of the ICBMs in 1993. SAC, it turns out, has been coming back quietly for quite some time.

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article AFGHANISTAN: Mundane Matters The Media Misses


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

HERALD1357    About time.   11/21/2008 12:13:29 PM
GSC still sounds goofier than SAC, but at least the central mission is back in focus which is just not custody of nuclear weapons, but their proper maintenance and USE as a ready deterrent. 
 
Herald

 
Quote    Reply

kensohaski       11/21/2008 2:12:56 PM
We do not need another agency.  Just a more disciplined approach...
 
Quote    Reply

Hurlbee36       11/22/2008 4:17:39 PM
Most of the mil's acronyms are silly although provide expedience in conversation/training.  I think of SAC as holding what makes a man a MAN.  That aside, maybe we'll return to the mission statements:
"To err is human. To forgive is not SAC policy"
"Peace Through Strength, Victory Through Devastation"
"Peace Is Our Profession" (This was a bit wimpy-Jimmy Carterish)
"The Cold War didn't just end, it was WON!" (This always gets the Soviets foaming at the mouth)
"In God We Trust. Everybody else has to have the right security badge and know the right response numbers" (or on the ground you go)

 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy