NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Armor Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Terrex The Terrific

September 12, 2009: Singapore is buying 135 Terrex Infantry Combat vehicles (ICV). The first infantry units will receive them in February 2010. The 25 ton Terrex is optimized for urban environments. The U.S. Army’s use of the Stryker ICV and its success on the battlefield influenced the selection of Terrex, and subsequent modifications.

Costing  $1.5 million each, the vehicle is externally similar to the Stryker, with 8 wheels and a remote controlled weapons turret atop the hull. The hull has a V shape for mine protection. The vehicle is 7 meters long (22.96 feet), 2.7 meters wide (8.85 feet), and 2.1 meters high (6.88 feet). The vehicle carries 13 soldiers and 2 crewmen (driver and commander), in its armored personnel carrier (APC) role. If a turret is used, 8 troops may be carried in addition to the driver and two men (commander and gunner) to operate the turret. Weapons such as the 25 mm cannon and 7.62mm machine gun are used against armored vehicles or structures. A 7.62mm machine gun is situated alongside and traverses with the gun. A 40mm Grenade launcher with 7.62mm machine gun may replace the cannon.

More ballistic protection is available in the form of bolt on or welded armor (slat, cage type), which is fitted alongside the hull for defense against Rocket Propelled Grenades (RPG’s). If hit, the tires are designed for run flat operation and include a central air inflation system permitting the driver to control the amount of air in each tire. The driver sits in front to the left of the engine. Top speed is 110 kilometers per hour with a range of 800 kilometers. The vehicle is amphibious, using water jets mounted on either side of the rear hull to propels the vehicle at 10 kilometers per hour in the water.

Electronics a Battlefield Management System (BMS) which permits full awareness of a battlespace providing sharable information to other vehicles or soldiers. A Weapon Detection System (WDS) is provided to spot enemy fire. All information is displayed on colored screens in the commander’s position just aft of the driver.

The vehicle is intended for modularity and may be further configured into an armored recovery vehicle, mortar carrier, ambulance, 105mm mobile gun platform, and rocket launcher. In any configuration Nuclear Biological or Chemical protection is standard regardless of weather or combat environment.

Indonesia expressed the desire to acquire 420 vehicles with a license to produce it locally. Turkey has also licensed the vehicle for production.

The closest counterpart to the Terrex, the Stryker, is similar in specifications with a cost of 1.42 million per vehicle, length of 6.95 meters (22.92 feet), width of 2.72 meters (8.97 feet), and a height of 2.64 meters (8.72 feet). Weight is 16.47 tons (33,400 pounds). It has a speed and range of 100 kilometers per hour and 500 kilometers respectively. It may be configured in similar vehicle guises as Terrex and can carry identical armament. -- Mike Perry

 

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article WARPLANES: Heron Eats Predator Leftovers


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

LB    Fact Check   9/12/2009 4:17:33 PM
Mike Perry it appears you either do not understand the subject matter or can not be bothered to fact check what you write.  Every eight wheeled armored vehicle should not be compared to a Stryker which is itself merely another derivative of the original Swiss MOWAG Piranha.  The Terrex ICV is in fact rather different from a Stryker in that it's significantly heavier at 25 tons, is fully amphibious with dual water jets, has both a double hull and v shaped, and among other things it has double wishbone suspension and traction control. 
 
Can this website please stop comparing every eight wheeled APC to a Stryker?  The Swiss Piranha is used by more than 30 nations of which the US uses both the LAV-25 and Stryker.  Eight wheeled armored vehicles have been in use since at least the 1930's.
 
Quote    Reply

doggtag    actually,...   9/13/2009 7:20:35 AM
...I give him credit: this is one of SP's better articles on the subject.
Notice he didn't outright call it "Singapore Stryker", but rather more fairly made reasonable comparison (terms like "closest counterpart" are better than saying "this country is building its own Strykers").
Kudos to him.
 
 
However, in that last paragraph, suggesting the Stryker can "be configured in similar vehicle guises as Terrex and can carry identical armament"
and "with a cost of 1.42 million per vehicle" is misleading:
 
The base chassis of the Stryker may be somewhere around that, ahem, "cheap" price, but to configure it further into the specific designs (ICV, MGS, ATGM, etc) runs the costs higher (any of you US Army and government folk who can search thru the FOUO FedLog system can see the sticker price the Army is charged).
As to the armament systems: the best Stryker can offer is podded systems like CROWS/RWS and gun/missile pods, or towed and turntable-mounted mortars.
The Terrex, on the other hand, can mount full turrets with some decent levels of armor protection.
The US was too scant on properly protecting the Strykers under the guise/excuse of keeping them airmobile by C-130, which has since been dropped with the reality check that the necessary upgrades to the vehicles' systems are pushing the vehicles up past 25 tons, to where no C-130 can carry them any distance in a battle-ready condition.
 
Looking at what a country like Singapore (with assistance) has created in the Terrex,
what France has created in the VBCI,
what Germany has created in the Boxer (the highest priced one here!),
and what Italy has created in the Freccia (Centauro sibling),
the US only wishes its Strykers were that well thought-out (you'll never see one in a battle theater without that birdcage anymore).
 
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Shawnc    The message fits the audience   9/14/2009 9:48:15 AM
@DT
 
A few years ago when I was contributing news articles here, the writing brief was to 'dumb-down' the articles to make it more 'reader-friendly' - to readers who haven't had any extensive military experience or interest in mil-tech - hence the '8 wheeled AFV's must have a Stryker comparison' since most of the audience is apparently from America.
 
And actually, they do that a bit here... every 'stealthy' aircraft article has the F-35 and/or F-22 mentioned somewhere, for example.
 
My main gripe about Mike Perry's article on the Terrex is that it looks like he paraphrased the Wiki article on the Terrex. Points missed include the fact that the Terrex is actually a contempory of the Stryker, and not a 'copy' as his article implies. In fact, a lesser-armoured version of the original Terrex concept was one of the six contenders in the US Army's ICV (Interim Combat Vehicle) contest. If the Terrex had won over the LAV III, you'd be calling it a Stryker!
 
It was also basically a private development by ST Kenetics - there was no requirement from the Singapore Army, which is why it's taken 8 years to bring it into service in Singapore.
 
And the closest counterpart to the Terrex, btw, is the Taiwanese CM-32 Clouded Leopard, which is another Timoney-based design.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy