NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Marines Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Why The USMC Does It Better

October 22, 2009: The U.S. Marines have a macho reputation. And they like it that way. One member of the Clinton administration described the marines as "extremists." Privately, many marines took that as an unintended compliment. Potential recruits see the marines the same way, a bunch of tough, lethal, disciplined troops with impressive uniforms. And since most of the potential recruits for any branch of the military are teenagers, the marines have a natural appeal. If you need any convincing, just take note of the kinds of music and movies teenagers like, and the fact that the marines have the least trouble meeting their recruiting goals. Further proof can be found by attending the recruiting presentations regularly held in many high schools. Each of the services gets up and makes their pitch. The army, air force and navy rattle off all the goodies they offer, like travel to foreign countries, money for college, career training. Many of the students nod off. Then the marine sergeant gets up and shows a short video of tough looking teenage marines storming beaches, jumping out of armored vehicles and helicopters and generally behaving like natural born killers. The sergeant then tells the kids that the marines can only promise them challenges. Not everyone can be a marine and he only wants to recruit those who are up to it. The students are fully awake through all this, and the marines generally end up with more recruits than anyone else. Recruiters from the other services mutter about how they would do better if they had a more impressive looking uniform.

The marines have another advantage. Just about all marines have combat jobs. The navy provides most of the support troops. Put another way, it's as if the army rangers or paratroopers had their own recruiters. Their pitch would be very similar to the marines, and would get similar results. That idea has been tossed around in the other services, but no one has taken the plunge yet. Yet it's an old idea. For thousands of years, individual military units went out looking for recruits. The idea of one recruiting organization for everyone is relatively new. In the past, each regiment or ship had its own small recruiting staff, and the new guys were generally taken from the same area. This was a big help for unit cohesion, which is today called "team building." Commanders have known for thousands of years that, in the thick of combat, the principle motivation is men fighting for each other, for their friends and "team mates." Military, and civilian organizations, strive to build this unit cohesion. Few military organizations, or companies, pull it off. Except for the marines.

What the marines have done is part show biz and part common sense. Everyone notices the snappy dress uniforms and military bearing of marines. There's also that cocky attitude. And career marines are expected scowl at the camera when official photos are taken. All that is the show biz. The common sense angle is the marine's emphasis, in their training and indoctrination, on their main job; ground combat. Get ready for that and you get fewer marines killed when you get into a fight. Even though the navy supplies many of the support functions, many marines are not in combat jobs. Yet it's a tradition that "every marine is a rifleman." Non-combat marines spend part of each year refreshing their infantry skills. The older NCOs repeat the stories of how, in the past, marine cooks and clerks were thrown into the line when the situation got desperate. And the marines relish a desperate situation. They have favorite maxims like, "there's no such thing as being surrounded, but there are times when you can attack in any direction."

But soldiering has changed for most of the other troops in the world. It's fashionable to play down grim and costly ground combat in favor of precision weapons and push button warfare. For this reason, the marines are seen as a bunch of roughneck throwbacks. Yet, even today, in any of the two dozen wars being fought around the world, the troops who are the most successful are the ones that operate most like the marines. What the marines are may not be fashionable, but when you have to get close to the enemy, what they do works.

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article IRAQ: The Sunni Sun Has Set


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

timon_phocas       10/22/2009 9:18:28 AM
Plagiarized or not, this conforms to my experience. I saw the same thing when I was on  recruiting duty. The reps of the other services would make their presentations, talking about swimming pools, bowling alleys and college credits. The Marine recruiter would get up and tell everyone that the Corps wasn't about bennies. The Corps was about fighting and winning wars.
 
Quote    Reply

stbretnco       10/22/2009 9:19:35 AM
If the editor-in-chief wants to copy from his own work, I think he's welcome to.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Ringo       10/22/2009 1:08:04 PM
It really makes sense.  If you are interested in being a combat troop, your safest bet is the Marines.  It isn't that the Navy/Air Force/Army don't have combat troops.....it's that they also have many support roles as well.  This lessens the chance of getting the position that you want.  These support roles are critical.....but that doesn't make them into cool videos or for exciting stories. 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Gerry       10/22/2009 9:23:50 PM
I just finished reading an artical that told of "Eleanor Roosevelt"  after returning from the pacific where she had met and talked with many marines. She said  " I have never met men with cleaner bodies, and filthier minds, higher morale, and lower morals of any animal, than the US marines. Thank god for the marines".
 
 
Gotta love Eleanor.
 
Quote    Reply

sjdoc    The safest place to be   10/23/2009 8:21:14 AM
When dropped into a situation where you're almost certainly going into harm's way, it's best to go in with people whose attitudes and training have prepared them to inflict the maximum harm in return. 
 
I was never in (nor could I ever have been) in one of the combat arms, so I tend to use my father's experience in World War II as an example. 
 
When he was conscripted in 1944 and found himself in the Naval Reserve, he looked around at the largely Sad Sack catch of fellow boots and realized that a lot of these slack-jawed stupes were going to get themselves (and a lot of the people around them) killed.  By 1944, my father and his contemporaries had realized that a lot of American lives were going to be lost before the war was over.  Guadalcanal, Tarawa, North Africa, Sicily, and Italy had happened, and the invasion of France was assuredly coming.  Combat with the Japanese was just getting bloodier. 
 
So when he tested out with aptitude sufficient to qualify him for admission to Submarine School - an all-volunteer elite force - he went for it.  He suffered through Spritz's Navy, went into the Pacific, and survived the war despite the fact that (as he only learned later) the Submarine Service had the highest rate of fatal casualties of any service in the U.S. military.
 
When, as a teenager, I asked him about this, he explained that "None of us expected to live through the war, and I figured it was better to serve with volunteers, all of whom wanted to be there."  
 
The Army today tends to stay away from regional recruiting (the "team building" advantage acknowledged) because of what happened to National Guard units in World War II.  One really bad day on the Rapido or Omaha Beachhead or in the Huertgen and a small town could and did lose a whole generation of young men.
 
No joke.  This has the sort of adverse public relations consequences that the Army damn' well doesn't want to suffer in an era when the Congress refuses to utter anything remotely resembling a lawful declaration of war.  
 
 
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy