China: February 18, 2001

Archives

The Clinton Administration's war plans had assumed that any Chinese attack on Taiwan could be thwarted with minimal US forces (one wing of 72 land-based fighters, two carrier battle groups, and a dozen heavy bombers flying from Guam). A new study by Rand says that this force is totally inadequate, as the US needed six carrier battle groups, 50 heavy bombers, and ten land-based fighter wings to defeat Iraq (which presumably had smaller forces than China, but didn't have a few miles of ocean to move its army across). The Rand Study, however, rejects plans by Congress to provide Taiwan with entirely new weapon systems, saying that upgrading existing equipment and providing AMRAAM missiles for Taiwan's fighters will be adequate.--Stephen V Cole

 

X

ad

Help Keep Us From Drying Up

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling.

Each month we count on your contribute. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage.
Subscribe   contribute   Close