On Point: Democracy, Whiskey, Sexy: Liberty Demands Responsibility

by Austin Bay
June 30, 2015

"Democracy! Whiskey! And Sexy!" an exuberant Iraqi yelled as American soldiers entered his hometown, the southern city of Najaf.

His phrase became a motto. I think George Washington would have loved it. He fought for freedom and, at Mount Vernon, distilled whiskey.

Our Najafite didn't spontaneously blurt this quirky mingle of institutionalized liberty and libertinism. The New York Times said he replied to a question asking how he hoped Najaf might change since Saddam Hussein's Baath Party no longer ran it.

The incident occurred on April 2, 2003, the same day Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani's Baath jailers fled Najaf. For 10 years, Saddam kept Sistani under house arrest. Though the U.S. presence freed Iraq's supreme Shia cleric, no one shouted, "Religious freedom!" Perhaps "Democracy!" covered that. It should, but doesn't always, not even in the USA.

Our man in Najaf understood that democracy comes first. Compared to Saddam's libidinous sons, Hollywood's hedonists are rank amateurs. Saddamists would let you sip Kentucky's finest while running a cathouse, but you had to kowtow to Baath elites and guarantee them a cut of the action.

Non-connected? Forget it. Saddam ruled by fear. If he turned on you, you died, gruesomely, often by torture.

Our Najafite thought democratic laws allowed average Alis to do things and have things the dictator denied or strictly controlled. Buying bourbon and haunting nightclubs made his point, with trans-cultural humor.

In 2015, Iraq has whiskey and sex. However, Iranian-backed militias bully Baghdad, and the Islamic State maniacal terrorists control chunks of the country. While Iraq has run several national elections, its government is moribund.

Yet today more Iraqis enjoy greater freedom than they did under Saddam. Media are much freer. Everybody mouths off and criticizes the government.

Democracy is a convoluted system in which criticism is encouraged and governing involves the consent of the critical governed. It asserts that individual citizens possess rights (liberties). But liberty without responsibility may degrade to libertinism, and so democracy demands shared responsibility. Got that? Individual rights, but shared responsibility? Using checks and balances, a democracy attempts to run powerful institutions while restraining their power.

The Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution and the Federalist Papers provide pragmatic guidance for organizing and maintaining a democratic republic. However, some major structural inconsistencies (e.g., slavery) ignited our bloody Civil War.

In 1814, John Adams expressed pessimism: "Democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself. There was never a democracy yet that did not commit suicide."

Yet the U.S. has survived near-suicidal civil war and other rebellions. This may disappoint our Najafite: In 1794, President Washington put down the Whiskey Rebellion. Armed distillers resisted taxation. Commander in chief George personally led the army. Rather than fight Washington (he was the top combat officer in the Americas), the rebels dispersed.

Democratic societies are difficult to create and keep. Maintaining democracy requires political maturity and restraint. At the individual level, that means recognizing the difference between personal liberty and selfish license.

At the national level, it takes more sobering commitments. French philosopher Jean Francois Revel, in his book "How Democracies Perish," wrote: "Societies of which permanent criticism is an integral feature are the only livable ones, but they are also the most fragile." Revel concluded that democracies are threatened "as long as theirs is not the only system in the world," and they "must compete with systems that do not burden themselves with the same obligations."

The obligations involve shared responsibility. Such responsibility may entail risking war with "systems that do not burden" their people with obligations. These prison societies -- like Saddam's Iraq or Vladimir Putin's Russia or the Kims' North Korea -- are ruled by lawless whim.

You like the right to mouth off? That's democracy, and from it your version of whiskey and sexy flow. If you appreciate that right, thank an American soldier, should you have the chance. And happy Fourth of July.

Read Austin Bay's Latest Book

To find out more about Austin Bay and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.


On Point Archives:

On Point Archives: Current 2023  2022  2021  2020  2019  2018  2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001



Help Keep Us From Drying Up

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling.

Each month we count on your contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage.
Subscribe   Contribute   Close