Article Archive: Current 1999 2000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Surface Forces: The Other LCS Aces Sea Trials
   Next Article → AFGHANISTAN: Corruption Is Your Friend
November 22, 2009: The second of two American Littoral (coastal) Combat Ship (LCS) designs has successfully completed its trials. The ship, the USS Independence, will be commissioned in January. The U.S. Navy's first 3,000 ton LCS is already in service, and discovering what life is really like for the most radical new ship design in decades. Completed last year at a Lake Michigan shipyard, the USS Freedom is now at its home port, San Diego, and going to sea regularly. The USS Freedom is a more conventional design, looking like any other 3,000 ton warship.

The USS Independence is a little lighter (2,800 tons) than Freedom. The most obvious difference between the two designs is that trimaran design provides a larger, and more stable, flight deck for helicopters, and more interior space. The trimaran design is based on one pioneered since he 1980s by Australian ship builder Austal. This design has been used by several successful fast transports, used with much success in the Pacific since the 1990s. Austal was selected to design the Independence based on the success of their earlier trimaran designs, some of which were used by the U.S. Navy. Next year, the two designs will be put to a lot of tests to see if one is sufficiently superior to the other to justify a single design being used for all 50 LCS ships. There is also the possibility that both ships will prove suitable, in different ways, to get the job done. In this case, each design will get a share of the 50 or so LCS ships built.

In general, there are also several unanswered questions for the LCS, that could only be cleared up by actually taking one to sea. One issue was refueling at sea. Now the U.S. Navy has been doing this for over a century, and has the drill down pretty good. The oiler (fuel ship) and receiving ship move in parallel (30-60 meters apart), at a slow speed (about 25 kilometers an hour) and the oiler shoots over cables that hold a fuel line. The two ships maintain their position and speed by synchronizing the revolutions of their propellers. The LCS has two problems with this drill. First, the LCS doesn't use a propeller (but water jets). No problem, it turns out, as the LCS has a lot more control over speed. After some practice using a computer simulator, the "keeping station" with the oiler problem was solved. Another problem was the flat bottom of the LCS 1 (which makes it capable of entering very shallow littoral waters), makes the vessel roll in rough seas. This proved to be a minor problem. LCS 2, and its trimaran design, has less problems with this. Crews will get lots of practice with at-sea refueling, because the LCS has to do so every 3-4 days when travelling with a task force on the high seas.

Another minor problem is that the LCS is not equipped to take pallets of other supplies from an oiler (which is actually a combined cargo/tanker ship these days). So pallets will have to be delivered by helicopter. The USS Freedom has not yet received its SH-60 helicopter, but having pallets delivered this way is not expected to be a problem.

Another potential problem is the high speed of the LCS, which is the fastest seagoing ship to ever serve with the U.S. fleet. The USS Freedom has gone as fast as 85 kilometers an hour, and it's believed that the power plant can be tweaked to get that a little higher. At such high speeds, it's easier to run into whales. This occasionally happens, especially at night. For larger ships, the result is usually a dead, or badly injured whale, and little damage to the ship. But the smaller LCS, hitting a large whale, while travelling at high speed, could leave the ship damaged (the whale would definitely be dead.) So far, the sailors on the bridge are to keep a sharp lookout for whales when the ship is travelling at high speed.

The LCS has a crew of 40, which is pretty small for a ship this size (which, in the past, would have about four times as many sailors). But the LCS is highly automated. On the Freedom, the captain decided that officers, including himself, would pitch in with maintenance and housekeeping chores. More so than in larger ships, sailors learn to do other jobs on an LCS, and, as a result, work is lot more interesting and less boring. But it can get intense at times, and there are still questions about whether the smaller crew, and all the "smartship" tech can really handle the kind of damage control emergencies that crop up on military ships

Normally, an LCS would have another 35 crew manning its "mission package". The LCS is designed for a variety of interchangeable modules (e.g., air defense, underwater warfare, special operations, surface attack, etc.), which will allow the ships to be quickly reconfigured for various specialized missions. Crews will also be modularized, so that specialized teams can be swapped in to operate specific modules. Thus about 40 percent of the ship is empty, with a large cargo hold into which the mission package gear is inserted (and then removed, along with the package crew, when it is no longer assigned to that ship.) Thus the LCS has two crews when underway, the "ship" crew and the mission package crew. The captain of the ship crew is in charge, and the officer commanding the mission package is simply the officer in charge of the largest equipment system on board. In addition, the core crew of 40 is actually two crews ("blue" and "gold") who take turns running the ship. This makes it possible to keep an LCS at a distant posting for years, by simply flying in a relief crew every six months.

Three years ago, when construction began on LCS 1, it was to displace 2,500 tons, with a full load draft of under ten feet (permitting access to very shallow "green" and even "brown" coastal and riverine waters, where most naval operations have taken place in the past generation. Top speed is expected was to be over 80 kilometers with a range of 6,300 kilometers (at much slower cruising speed). The 378 foot long ship still has the range and top speed it was designed for. Basic endurance is 21 days. Thus the Freedom has to refuel and resupply more frequently than larger ships. When using its max speed a lot, much more fuel is burned, and that 21 day endurance can be reduced to 3-4 days.

Built using "smartship" technologies, which greatly reduce personnel requirements, the basic LCS was expected to require a crew of 40 in basic configuration, but will have billeting for about 75 personnel. The recent sea trials gave the smartship features a workout, which, so far appears to be successful. The successful sea trials were very important, because the LCS project was over budget, behind schedule and, worst of all, an untried new concept.

The two different LCS designs are quite different in appearance. Freedom has a semi-planning monohull, while Independence is a trimaran. LCS 1 (USS Freedom) was laid down by Lockheed Martin in Marinette, Wisconsin, in June of 2005 and was expected to be commissioned in 2007, after months of sea tests in late 2006. That schedule slipped, with the ship not completed until late 2008, and sea trials not starting until January, 2009.

LCS 2 (USS Independence) was laid down by General Dynamics in late 2005. These, and LCS 3 and LCS 4, were to be built by Lockheed and General Dynamics, respectively. These are also essentially prototypes, and serial procurement was expected to begin this year, after initial design flaws had been worked out. That has slipped a year or two. Ultimately, the Navy hoped to have 55 LCSs by 2014-18, at a cost of $90 million each. Congress has capped the price of LCS ships at $460 million, after years of increases, and threats to cancel the project.

There were a lot of problems with the LCS design. The USS Freedom ended up costing $500 million, more than twice what the first ship in the class was supposed to have cost. Next year, the navy will choose which of the designs will serve as the model for all future LCS class vessels. At that point, the winner will build two more ships of their design, and the loser one. All five of these LCS ships will be used heavily to determine what changes in the basic design are required. Then, mass production will commence, to build another 50 ships. The US Navy has ordered a second LCS (Littoral Combat Ship) from Lockheed Martin.

The LCS is armed with a 57mm gun, four 12.7mm machine-guns, and an eleven cell SeaRam system for air and missile defense. The RAM (RIM-116 "Rolling Air Frame") missiles replace Phalanx autocannon. SeaRAM has a longer range (7.5 kilometers) than the Phalanx (two kilometers).

Next Article → AFGHANISTAN: Corruption Is Your Friend
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
WarNerd       11/22/2009 9:23:58 AM

If the LCS can "only" do 85 kph then the Pegasus class hydrofoils were faster.  Of course they were an order of magnitude smaller (235 tons).

 
Quote    Reply

ens. jack    Sowhat are they actually for?   11/22/2009 9:47:23 AM
Are these supposed to be serving as task group escorts or what? Their capabilities are way limited. Only way they could match the versatility and power of an Arleigh Burke is if there were at least four of them operating together, each with a different weapon/sensor package.  They're too expensive to be useful for coastal defence, which they would be good for, too light to be used as standalone cruiser, and too large to be used for spec ops infiltration/exfiltration.
 
Quote    Reply

YelliChink       11/22/2009 3:25:27 PM

Are these supposed to be serving as task group escorts or what? Their capabilities are way limited. Only way they could match the versatility and power of an Arleigh Burke is if there were at least four of them operating together, each with a different weapon/sensor package.  They're too expensive to be useful for coastal defence, which they would be good for, too light to be used as standalone cruiser, and too large to be used for spec ops infiltration/exfiltration.

These will be either fast armed transport, anti-pirate platform, or hives for both airborne, surface or underwater drones.
 
I would recognize that this approach is too risky and expensive, though.
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       11/22/2009 4:23:41 PM

Are these supposed to be serving as task group escorts or what? Their capabilities are way limited. Only way they could match the versatility and power of an Arleigh Burke is if there were at least four of them operating together, each with a different weapon/sensor package.  They're too expensive to be useful for coastal defense, which they would be good for, too light to be used as standalone cruiser, and too large to be used for spec ops infiltration/exfiltration.

They are supposed to be a cheaper vessel than an Arleigh Burke with self defense capacity only, not area defense, and a shallow draft for green and brown water operations where an Arleigh Burke really shouldn't go except to get to a dock.  They are not meant as a replacement for, or to get in a slugging match against, major surface combatants.
 
They are not meant to put spec ops directly ashore themselves, but are designed to operate as a mothership for spec ops units via special handling facilities for small boats, helicopters, etc.  In this area their capabilities are probably exceed any vessels except the specialized amphibious warfare units.
 
Quote    Reply

achilles       11/22/2009 11:27:13 PM



Are these supposed to be serving as task group escorts or what? Their capabilities are way limited. Only way they could match the versatility and power of an Arleigh Burke is if there were at least four of them operating together, each with a different weapon/sensor package.  They're too expensive to be useful for coastal defense, which they would be good for, too light to be used as standalone cruiser, and too large to be used for spec ops infiltration/exfiltration.
    The LCS is infact a great concept, especially IF employed in the same , specific manner decribed above. Now all we have to do is hope our future adversaries recognize this and agree not to attack it...........
After years of development, both LM and GD have both succeeded in building very fast, very expensive vessals insearch of a mission. The only mission one can gleen from its specifications is that of a high tech, high spead "truck" with little or no offensive capability. A $500M vessal that will stay out of harms way or run away from it; scenarios that I personally don't find reassuring in light of the fast changing global dynamic.
If fact, I agree with the previous comment, the Pegaus program created a very fast vessal, with vastly more firepower than either LCS and millions of dollars cheaper. Even the WWII PT boat delivered moe firepower than the current LCS design! Perhaps we have reached the end of naval design and its now time to look "back" to see which platform worked in WWII and impove on the design with new materials, technology,  propulsion and weapon systems; all for a lot less than $500M a copy.
 


They are supposed to be a cheaper vessel than an Arleigh Burke with self defense capacity only, not area defense, and a shallow draft for green and brown water operations where an Arleigh Burke really shouldn't go except to get to a dock.  They are not meant as a replacement for, or to get in a slugging match against, major surface combatants.

 

They are not meant to put spec ops directly ashore themselves, but are designed to operate as a mothership f
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       11/27/2009 7:39:53 AM
The trimaran design is based on one pioneered since he 1980s by Australian ship builder Austal. This design has been used by several successful fast transports, used with much success in the Pacific since the 1990s. 

That's not exactly correct. That LCS design was based on the Austal trimaran  ?Benchijigua Express?.  That platform operates in the Canary Islands as an island hopper and was the largest blue water tri built at that point in time.  It served as the basis for the LCS Austal submission

The Austal Australian multi leased by the USMil Sealift Command is the Westpac Express - it's a large cat. The INCAT Australian multi leased by the USN is also a cat. (HSV2)

The tri's have been successful in the caribean, the cats have been successful in the pacrim and sea of japan.  


 
Quote    Reply