NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Special Operations Article Index : Current 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

A Few Good Foreigners

April 13, 2009: Despite the end of imperialism (European colonies around the world), most Western European militaries find ways to make good use of the legacy of colonialism and the thousands of native soldiers that served for centuries under European command. One way of doing this is to retain some colonial units and form them into an n elite “army within and army”. 

At least three European nations currently do this and the results are usually impressive. The British still retain the regiment of elite Nepalese Gurkhas, a colonial unit left over from the Indian British Raj. Widely respected for their courage and stubborn fighting ability, Gurkhas have formed an integral part of Britain’s land forces for over a century. 

Across the English Channel, the French made extensive use of colonial troops during counter-insurgency operations in Algeria and Indochina (Vietnam), especially Vietnamese and French Foreign Legion soldiers. The use of these types of troops in far-off wars provided numerous advantages to the Europeans then, as they do now. This is because colonial troops are mercenaries. The units tend to be stocked not with raw conscripts or politicized citizen recruits, but with well-trained, well-disciplined professional soldiers for whom the army is a career and a better alternative to other forms of employment back home, which pay far less. Such troops perform better under fire and are less likely to complain about the controversial nature of deploying to fight in far-off lands for dubious causes. 

With the era of colonialism at an end, these regiments are disbanded or transferred over to the new respective national governments of former colonies. But sometimes Europeans keep some of these forces for the same reasons they raised them in the first place: they’re tough professional, and don’t complain about why they’re fighting. It’s their job.   Retaining such units, like the Legion and Gurkhas, makes it easy for the French and the British to deploy dependable troops in quick fashion to hotspots around the world. Instead of simply incorporating them as “just another formation”, playing up a battalion or regiment’s colorful colonial history often produce a surprising amount of esprit de corps and unit cohesion. Being bound together by tradition and a fighting history sometimes centuries old, such soldiers are almost always more reluctant to protest combat deployments for fear of bringing shame to their fellow soldiers and their unit as a whole. 

Although perpetually overshadowed by its French counterpart, the Spanish Foreign Legion (now often simply called “The Spanish Legion”) is an example of how this concept can be perfected. The Legion was founded in the 1920s to fight rebellious tribesmen in Spanish Morocco, the first men being largely recruited from prisons and the criminal class of Spain. The Spanish Legion is a small (only about 8,500 officers, NCOs, and enlisted men), highly motivated, well-trained, professional entity in itself that serves as a component of the regular Spanish Army. Although possessing a shorter history than its French equivalent, the Spanish force gained a reputation for stubborn, ferocious fighting during the Spanish Civil War under the command of General Francisco Franco’s Nationalist forces. 

The corps is issued the same weapons and equipment as the regular army and comes under the authority of the army chief of staff and the King. The Legion these days retains its colonial traditions which sometimes border on medieval, including a flamboyant uniform, mascot, and relics with Catholic symbolism such as a life-sized crucifix paraded by an honor guard, to heighten unit pride. It is now foreign only in name since almost all its troops are Spaniards. Still, the Legion, with its battle cry of “Vive Meurte!” (Long Live Death!), is retained by the monarchy as the most effective shock troops at Spain’s disposal, able to deployed anywhere in the world to fight for King and Country with a minimum of grumble. Indeed, Legion tradition holds that battle is something to be desired to prove the legionnaire’s mettle.   Whether French, British, or Spanish, some European countries have discovered it’s always useful to have a few good, dependable men.   -- Rory Walkinshaw

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article PROCUREMENT: The Giant Stumbles


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Pages: 1 2
LB    Colonial?   4/13/2009 6:56:19 AM
Neither Foreign Legion is really a "colonial" formation as the French Foreign Legion is and has been almost entirely composed of Europeans and the Spanish Foreign Legion is almost entirely composed of Spaniards.  Moreover, the Spanish Legion was known for it's conservative uniform, far less "flamboyant" than that worn by the Spanish Army, and I had thought they dropped Long Live Death after Franco died?
 
The French Foreign Legion was formed around 1830 due entirely to the law being changed that only Frenchmen could serve in the French Army.  The Gurkha's are really the only "colonial" unit of the three and in reality the Gurkha's are and always have been mercenaries and not colonial troops as Nepal was never conquered by the British.  Indeed it was during the war that failed to conquer Nepal that the British were impressed by the Gurkha troops and began using them after the defeat, but not conquest, of Nepal.
 
Quote    Reply

pacific_waters    A few good foreigners   4/13/2009 9:33:06 AM
Nor are they mercenaries by definition unless you're a NYT reporter. The Ghurkas are not mercenaries as they are part of the of the TOE of the British army.
 
Quote    Reply

JFKY    Mercenaries   4/13/2009 10:24:13 AM
Sorry dude...Ghurkas and Legionaires....IF you are in them employ of another nation, you're a mercenary.  The Ghurkas are Nepalese NATIONALS,  fighting for Britain for pay...that makes them mercenaries.  If you're a Swede in la Legion Etrangere, you're mercenary...if you're French dude in the Legion, you're not...if you are fighting for pay, for another nation or group, you're a mercenary, it's the very defintion OF a mercenary.  Your only stake in the fight is your pay packet.....whether you're "Mad Mike" Hoare or Kulbir Thapa.
 
Quote    Reply

Kugelblitz       4/13/2009 2:10:15 PM
Don't forget that the Spanish Legion served in Russia. Under Hitler.
 
Quote    Reply

LB    Spanish Foreign Legion WWII   4/13/2009 2:21:04 PM
Sorry but that is not correct.  The Spanish Blue Division consisting of Spanish Fascist volunteers, that Franco was happy to be rid of, fought as a regular German Army infantry division- the 250th.  The actual Legion was reduced in size after the Civil War by Franco and I believe remained in Morocco.
 
Quote    Reply

leftwinger       4/13/2009 10:00:52 PM
Gurkhas and Foreign Legionnaires are not mercenaries as defined by international law, just as members of the U. S. Armed Forces who are not U. S. citizens are not mercenaries.  Even though they may not be citizens of the U. K. or France, they are members of their armed forces.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       4/13/2009 10:16:47 PM
small point.

UK, India and Brunei have Ghurka/Ghorkas

 
 
Quote    Reply

jastayme3       4/13/2009 10:36:37 PM

Sorry dude...Ghurkas and Legionaires....IF you are in them employ of another nation, you're a mercenary.  The Ghurkas are Nepalese NATIONALS,  fighting for Britain for pay...that makes them mercenaries.  If you're a Swede in la Legion Etrangere, you're mercenary...if you're French dude in the Legion, you're not...if you are fighting for pay, for another nation or group, you're a mercenary, it's the very defintion OF a mercenary.  Your only stake in the fight is your pay packet.....whether you're "Mad Mike" Hoare or Kulbir Thapa.



Not really true. Mercenaries can enlist for their pay packet. If they are any good they fight for loyalty to comrades and Not Looking Like A Wuss, like everyone else.
In any case, as the Gurkhas are a generations old Nepali tradition it is not clear that they are fighting just for pay. While it is enough of a reason given Nepal's not-overlarge GDP, the stories of one's granddad are a pretty good incentive to a restless youth tired of being a peasant.
 
Quote    Reply

arodrig6       4/14/2009 12:50:05 AM



Sorry dude...Ghurkas and Legionaires....IF you are in them employ of another nation, you're a mercenary.  The Ghurkas are Nepalese NATIONALS,  fighting for Britain for pay...that makes them mercenaries.  If you're a Swede in la Legion Etrangere, you're mercenary...if you're French dude in the Legion, you're not...if you are fighting for pay, for another nation or group, you're a mercenary, it's the very defintion OF a mercenary.  Your only stake in the fight is your pay packet.....whether you're "Mad Mike" Hoare or Kulbir Thapa.









Not really true. Mercenaries can enlist for their pay packet. If they are any good they fight for loyalty to comrades and Not Looking Like A Wuss, like everyone else.

In any case, as the Gurkhas are a generations old Nepali tradition it is not clear that they are fighting just for pay. While it is enough of a reason given Nepal's not-overlarge GDP, the stories of one's granddad are a pretty good incentive to a restless youth tired of being a peasant.

 Depends on the definition. Several dictionaries give "a professional soldier hired to serve in a foreign army." or something similar, in which case the Gurkhas probably are. However, the Geneva convention Article 47 defines a mercenary as "not a member of the armed forces of a party to the conflict"
 
Mercenary commonly has a negative connotation, although the word itself could refer to any 'hireling'
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

jlb       4/14/2009 6:16:10 AM
Another thing that makes the Foreign Legion not-quite-mercenary by any definition is that it carries a right to French citizenship after completing - I guess it's ten years service these days. Legionnaires are said to be "French by shed blood".
 
Quote    Reply

JFKY    Citizenship   4/14/2009 9:38:20 AM
Except I'd bet a majority of Foreign Legionnaires DON'T accept French citizenship....very few that I have read of have...it's about "having an adventure" or whatever might lead one to join the Legion, but it isn't about serving France.
 
And I'd say the fact that Ghurka's serve in a number of other nations militaries, pretty much demonstrates that Ghurkas are mercenaries.  As someone said, mercenary has a pejorative tone...get over it...they are mercenaries.  They can be great human beings, they can be great soldiers, but they are Nepalese NATIONALS, fighting and dying for Britain, or India, or Brunei...just like the Swiss mercenaries fought and died in Renaissance Italy for various non-Swiss masters.
 
In the US I believe you can serve with Canadians and Israelis forces and not lose your citizenship...and if you serve the ten years with The Legion and accept the French citizenship you vacate your US citizenship.  Serve anywhere else and the US is going to consider you a mercenary or someone who has renounced your citizenship.  Serving as an example that the modern state system tends to think poorly of its citizens who fight for other states or groups.
 
Quote    Reply

Sty0pa       4/14/2009 10:21:49 AM

And I'd say the fact that Ghurka's serve in a number of other nations militaries, pretty much demonstrates that Ghurkas are mercenaries.  As someone said, mercenary has a pejorative tone...get over it...they are mercenaries. 

Can't get too tied up in nomenclature.
 
I'm pretty sure everyone posting here is working for a paycheck, and considering how it feels, some days my job description might be "whore".  :\
 
Quote    Reply

JFKY    It's not aobut a Pay Cheque   4/14/2009 10:46:36 AM
It's about someone from Group A, serving in the Military of Group B....generally when I kill for Group B, even though I'm not a member of Group B, I'm a mercenary....
 
 And your analogy is a little suspect...someone pays you to have sex...yes, that makes you a professional sex worker...you have sex, well that makes you human.  In this case, yes  the pay packet DOES define "mercenary", but in the realm of combat troops it doesn't.  It's the pay AND who signs the cheque...I'm Nepalese, but Gordie Brown/Queen Liz II/Sultan of Brunei/President Patil signs my cheque, I'm afraid I'm a mercenary.
 
Being a mercenary doesn't make you an international criminal...the Hague/Geneva Conventions can cover you.  You can be a "lawful combatant" AND a "mercenary." 
 
Quote    Reply

gw       4/14/2009 4:31:10 PM
The Ghurka Regt is under the wing of the British Army and has been for the last 200 plus years hmm let me think thats longer than the US had an Army
 
Quote    Reply

JFKY    Well GW   4/14/2009 6:15:03 PM
How long you've been a mercenary doesn't affect the DEFINITION of mercenary...  just like being a Wh*re, first trick, 1000th trick, you're still a wh*re.  So, the Nepalese have been British MERCENARIES for 200 years...well really since 1841, so they've only been mercenaries for 168 years.  They aren't British, they kill for the British...aren't eligible to BECOME British...and they receive a pay packet...dude, whether they just started yesterday or 160 years ago they ARE mercenaries.
 
Quote    Reply
Pages: 1 2





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy