NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Electronic Weapons Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Keeping An Eye On The Roads With Robots

December 26, 2008: A breakthrough in Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) design has resulted in systems weighing less than twenty pounds. These can be carried in small UAVs. The max effective range of these miniature SARs is ten kilometers, while larger SARs, weighing about 110 pounds, it is 25 kilometers. This is for the finest resolution, where the image can show people planning roadside bombs, or engaging in other mischief. SAR can see through clouds and sand storms.

The smaller SARs can be put on smaller (than Predator) UAVs, and used to patrol roads for hostile activity (setting up ambushes as well as laying roadside bombs). This is what is planned for Afghanistan, where there are longer, and more remote, roads to keep clean, than was the case in Iraq. Because of the billions of dollars going into defeating IEDs (Improvised Explosive Devices), miniature SARs on UAVs are showing up a decade or more earlier than would have been the case in peacetime. It's not just the money, and sense of urgency, being available. There's also the opportunity to use the new equipment under combat conditions.

The use of SAR and high resolution vidcams in Iraq was largely responsible for defeating the enemy IED campaign. A similar effort is taking place in Afghanistan. There are fewer IEDs being planted along Afghan roads, but they still cause casualties (mostly among civilians). But the SAR equipped UAV patrols will also make it more difficult for the Taliban or al Qaeda to move discreetly around the back country. SAR and vidcam images are also increasingly analyzed by computers, alerting human analysts only when something potentially useful is spotted.

 

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article CHAD: The UN Has A Plan To Stop The Greedy Bastards


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Dave_in_Pa    TomAtos, TomAHtos ...   12/26/2008 1:58:44 PM
This article states "The use of SAR and high resolution vidcams in Iraq was largely responsible for defeating the enemy IED campaign."
 
However, a December 19th Strategy Page article titled "Afghanistan Attacked By The Math Machine" stated that "The Task Force Odin led to the death of over 3,000 terrorists caught in the act of setting up roadside bombs, or lying in wait to set them off and attack their victims with gunfire. Hundreds more terrorists were captured, and many thousands of roadside bombs were avoided or destroyed before they could go off."  and "A related math tool is predictive analysis. This has been widely used in Iraq to determine who the bombers are, where they are, and where they are most likely to place their bombs next. This has enabled the geeks-with-guns (the Army OR specialists) to offer regular "weather reports" about expected IED activity."
 
So, which is it?  Reading both articles left me a bit confused, with a rather incoherent, seemingly contradictory explanation and picture.
 
Quote    Reply

HERALD1357       12/26/2008 2:27:51 PM

This article states "The use of SAR and high
resolution vidcams in Iraq was largely responsible for defeating the enemy IED
campaign."

 

However, a December 19th Strategy Page article titled "Afghanistan Attacked By The Math Machine" stated that "The Task Force Odin led to the death of
over 3,000 terrorists caught in the act of setting up roadside bombs, or lying
in wait to set them off and attack their
victims with gunfire. Hundreds more terrorists were captured, and many
thousands of roadside bombs were avoided or destroyed before they could go off."
  and "
A related
math tool is predictive analysis. This has been widely used in Iraq to
determine who the bombers are, where they are, and where they are most likely
to place their bombs next. This has enabled the geeks-with-guns (the Army OR
specialists) to offer regular "weather reports" about expected IED
activity."

 

So, which is it?  Reading both articles left me a bit confused, with a rather incoherent, seemingly contradictory explanation and picture.


Game theory tells you where to mount and POINT the cameras and GUNS. Then you as the cat wait for the mice to show up. Sometimes the mice get a little skittish so you have to send out some CHEESE as well.
 
Herald
 

 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy