Air Weapons: Perfecting Penetration


April 10, 2020: The U.S. Air Force is continuing to upgrade the effectiveness of its penetrator (“Bunker Buster”) bombs. Much of the upgrade work has gone into upgrading or fixing the fuze. Now, after nearly a decade of work, the more reliable and capable FMU-167/B Hard Target Sensing Fuze has gone into production.

Back in 2011, the U.S. Air Force spent $36 million to begin the development of a new Hard Target Sensing Fuze for its large (BLU-109 and larger) penetrator bombs. The new fuze would be reprogrammable by the pilot, while in the air. The pilot can specify how deep the bomb should go before detonating, as well as how many voids (levels of an underground bunker) to go through before detonating. A time delay can also be specified. The new fuze can survive a penetration force of 15,000 pounds per square inch (one ton per square cm). The new fuze was mainly for the BLU-109 (909 kg), 113 (2,136 kg) or 122 (2,268 kg) bombs .

Meanwhile, the air force has upgraded the bombs themselves. In mid-2018 production began for the new BLU-137/B as a replacement for the older BLU-109/B penetrator bomb. BLU-109 has been in use since 1985 and is usually mated with a Paveway laser-guidance kit like the GBU-27. Currently, the most frequently use penetrator bomb is this laser-guided, 909 kg (2,000 pound) BLU-109/B. This “bunker buster” can penetrate five meters (16 feet) of concrete and even more earth. This is accomplished using a 25mm thick steel cashing filled with 240 kg (530 pounds) of Tritonal. In the rear of the bomb is a time delay fuze.

In 2019 the air force also ordered more of its MOP (massive ordnance penetrator) GBU-57A/B bunker buster bombs. These 13.6 ton weapons cost $3.5 million each. The first MOPs were ordered in 2011. Even before that order was completed, changes were ordered in the design of MOP, including its fuze. At the time, it appeared that something basic was either not working or some new feature was desperately needed. At the same time, several B-2 bombers were equipped to carry these weapons (two bombs per B-2). This was apparently meant to send a message to Iran and North Korea. There were no other known targets for such a weapon but there are plenty of such targets in Iran and North Korea. Moreover, there were even deep bunkers in Afghanistan or Somalia where stealth bomber aren't needed to deliver a MOP. The enemy in those countries have no way of detecting a high flying B-52, much less a stealthy B-2. The B-52 was used to carry MOP during development tests.

Iran and North Korea do have air defense systems and a B-2 could slip past those radars and take out the air defense system command bunkers, or any other targets buried deep. The 6.2 meter (20.5 foot) long MOP has a thick steel cap and can penetrate 7.9-61 meters (26-200 feet) of concrete (depending on degree of hardness) or up to 61 meters of rocky earth, before exploding. The additional money may be needed to reconfigure, or reequip, MOPs with better penetration technology. The improvements enabled MOP to go deeper and pass through more voids before detonating. The number of MOPs available is not public information but is apparently 40 or more.

The air force has also not revealed details of how the new BLU-137/B was different but it is known that the air force has been concerned for years with the number of BLU-109/Bs that failed to detonate after penetrating. This is not a new problem. Improvements to the BLU-109 fuze and detonation system were not sufficient. As more BLU-109s were used against underground targets in Iraq and Syria (and Gaza, by Israeli aircraft). BDA (Bomb Damage Assessment) teams eventually got to target areas and confirmed what prisoner interrogation and other intel reports were describing as an “unacceptable” level of failed detonations. So the air force ordered a major redesign of its 2,000 pound penetrator bomb and apparently tested it sufficiently to be satisfied the reliability problems were fixed and now ordered it into mass production. The BLU-137/B will be interchangeable with the BLU-109/B so that equipment on aircraft or guidance kits won’t have to be modified.

The failure rate of the BLU-109/B was not so high that it could not be used. Instead, to ensure the destruction of an underground target multiple BLU-109/Bs would be used on certain targets. Many BLU-109/B targets were based on imperfect intel and were hit just to take the chance that the enemy bunker would be there and it would be destroyed. Many ISIL (Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant) members believed themselves protected by Allah when the penetrating bomb did indeed penetrate but did not detonate. Not exactly the sort of morale impact such weapons are supposed to have. If the BLU-137/B proves as reliable in combat as it did in testing, Islamic terrorists will find their divine intervention has diminished when it comes to penetrating bombs. ISII made extensive use of deep tunnels and bunkers. In Gaza, Hamas has been getting expert advice from Iranian tunnel builders on how to build more effective tunnels and bunkers. Israel had watched (from the air, and via spies on the ground) as Hezbollah used lots of its Iranian money to build underground bunkers in the areas of southern Lebanon that Israel withdrew from in 2000.

In 2012 Israel developed its own penetrator bomb design. This MPR-500.was for a 500 pound (227 kg) penetrator bomb. The MPR-500 can smash through more than a meter (39 inches) of concrete or four 200mm (8 inch) concrete barriers (floors or bunker walls) and then detonate. When the MPR-500 explodes it releases 26,000 fragments, which will wound or kill out to 100 meters. Satisfied with the effectiveness of the MPR-500 Israel went on to design 1,000 pound and 2,000 pound versions. It is unclear if the BLU-137/B design owes anything to the MPR line but Israel and the United States have freely exchanged design info and user experiences for decades and many American designs are heavily influenced and improved by Israeli technology.




Help Keep Us From Drying Up

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling.

Each month we count on your contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage.
Subscribe   Contribute   Close