NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Air Weapons Article Index : Current 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

SLAM Set To Hunt SUVs

August 28, 2009: The U.S. Navy has successfully tested its AGM-84K SLAM ER missile with a new guidance system which enables the tracking and destruction of moving land targets (like missile launchers, or SUVs full of terrorists). SLAM ER is a 1,400 pound (636 kilogram) missile with a 280 kilometer range, a 500-pound warhead, and costing half a million dollars each. Six years ago, navy upgraded SLAM so that it could be controlled in-flight. This became the first "ER" ("Expanded Response") version of SLAM. (Standoff Land Attack Missile.)

These original SLAM missile was first used during the 1991 Gulf War, and was very similar to the Harpoon (which it shared many components and design features with). SLAM was originally designed for destroying ships. But because of its accuracy, it was found capable of taking out land targets as well. Guidance is similar to JDAM (GPS and inertial guidance system), but with a heat seeker and final adjustments via a data link by the pilot any aircraft equipped with SLAM control equipment. In the past, the SLAM had to be programmed to fly a specific course before takeoff. Being able to reprogram the missile in flight is another capability required for weapons used via the battlefield Internet. This allows a satellite, aircraft or UAV to pick up a target (like an enemy ship hidden in a cove), and pass that data to an aircraft carrying a SLAM-ER.

 

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article STRATEGIC WEAPONS: Bulava Becomes Bulletproof


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

kisscatman       8/28/2009 5:46:00 PM
Why would you want to use a missile with a 500lb warhead against an SUV?  Overkill IMHO.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       8/28/2009 8:18:48 PM

Why would you want to use a missile with a 500lb warhead against an SUV?  Overkill IMHO.
the russians have used a Toschka TBM against a vehicle carrying a chechyan leader some 10 years ago.  they used it because they wanted to ensure that there was enough oomph if the target was a bit shy of the original CEP at strike.

ipso facto, it might also have been overkill to use a theatre battlefield rocket to knock out a 4wd at 80km, but it sure did do the job... :)
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       8/28/2009 8:27:01 PM
minor correction.  it was 13 years ago.  

CEP of the SS-21 at that time was 45 metres 
5 minute nominal response time but done in this case in 10mins from the initial vectoring/targetting of the terrorists last mobile/cell phone transmission to terminal strike.
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       8/29/2009 3:18:48 AM

Why would you want to use a missile with a 500lb warhead against an SUV?  Overkill IMHO.

Because you can? 
 
Some people will use anything to get into the game.
 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345    Osama bin Laden   8/29/2009 4:54:24 AM



Why would you want to use a missile with a 500lb warhead against an SUV?  Overkill IMHO.



Because you can? 

 

Some people will use anything to get into the game.

is worth a SLAM-ER or an H-bomb. The victory is the outcome determinant, for the investment. Not the cost of the munition.
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy