NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Air Weapons Article Index : Current 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Damning The DIME

January 14, 2009: For the last two decades, the U.S. and Israel have been developing smart bombs and missile warheads that have less collateral damage (the possibility of hurting people, especially civilians, adjacent to the target area). This has led to smaller smart bombs and missiles. In the 1990s, this even led to the United States filling some smart bombs with concrete, so that 500 or 1,000 pounds of inert material would just destroy anti-aircraft guns or radars sited in residential neighborhoods, and not harm nearby civilians ("radars in the playground" was one of Saddam Husseins favorite tricks during the 1990s).

Another direction of this research was even more exotic, and this was Dense Inert Metal Explosive (or DIME). This was a warhead that contained explosives mixed with a dense metal powder. Tungsten metal powder was used most successfully. When these warheads exploded, the tungsten particles quickly accelerated, and tore apart anything they hit. But these heavy particles quickly lost their momentum. This meant that anyone four or more meters (13 feet) from the explosion was hit with the blast, but not by lethal, high-speed tungsten particles.

The only problem with DIME is that, like tank gun penetrators (which also use heavy metals like tungsten), the heavy metal that remains in the area is a health risk. That's because all heavy metals (including the lead in bullets) causes cancer. For that reason, no one has used DIME warheads yet.

Hamas insists that Israel has used DIME, but Israel denies it. Hamas provides no proof, but anti-Israeli media in the Europe and the Middle East pick up the lie and propagate it as true. This has happened before, and will happen again. As far back as the Korean War (1950-53), China accused the United States of using chemical weapons because American military police used tear gas to break up riots by North Korean and Chinese prisoners-of-war.

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article ELECTRONIC WEAPONS: Blinded By The Laser Light


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

jwilly48519    "Tungsten is a health risk"...?   1/14/2009 6:33:11 AM
There may be objectively valid reasons not to use DIME ordnance, and important PR reasons not to do so even if those reasons are not objectively valid. But, it certainly isn't wholly correct to say that "all heavy metals (implying inclusion of tungsten) cause cancer".
 
Dense metals necessarily are used to provide exposure shielding in medical diagnostic imaging, interventional imaging and therapy applications utilizing ionizing radiation, such as gamma or X-ray. Tungsten increasingly is the go-to metal for such ionizing radiation shielding, particularly when there may be incidental patient or caregiver contact with the shielding materials, because of its significantly lesser health risks. In medical applications, lead exposure is highly regulated. REACH and ROHS regulations constrain its use. By comparison, tungsten is unregulated. In the US, it's broadly considered to not be a hazardous substance, in that the most pessamistic hazardous-ingestion level proposed so far is 500 to 1000 times above that of lead; acute toxicity occurs only at gross levels, not dissimilar to the similar toxicity of common cooking metals like copper and nickel; and while no one is suggesting that chronic exposure to this or any other environmental material should be regarded as innocuous until proven otherwise, there isn't even any substantial agreement yet among the most cautious healthcare watchdogs as to whether there in fact are causative mechanisms for particular chronic or long-term-exposure adverse effects, such as cancer or organ malfunctions.
 
That's not to say that it's a grand idea to have dissolved tungsten in a major acquifer supplying a civilian population with drinking water, or to scatter it generally around a civilian population in a form that human children and food animals could inadvertently consume. But if I were making ethical decisions as to what ordnance was going to be used in a war zone where I cared about those who would live in the area after the shooting had stopped, I'd certainly think that tungsten ballistic ordnance would be vastly preferable to lead, or depleted uranium, or to substitution of commensurately more complex-organic blast materials that have their own combustion-products water-and-ground contamination effects and carcinogenic likelihood.
 
Quote    Reply

HERALD1357    There is a reason why DIME is a bad idea,   1/14/2009 9:34:10 AM
but toxicity and/or the other rigamarole cited has nothing to do with it. Its the same reason tungsten core shot was a US rarity in WW II, and why we don't use it today.


When you don't have it, you can't afford to WASTE what you IMPORT..
 
Herald
 
Quote    Reply

Nichevo       1/14/2009 7:34:44 PM
Ditto, Herald.  Especially note the major PRODUCERS of good ol' wolfram.  This is definitely the right weapon to use against say CHINA.
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy