NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Air Weapons Article Index : Current 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Beyond Sidewinder

February 23, 2008: Half a century ago, the U.S. Sidewinder air-to-air heat seeking missile (AIM-9A) scored its first kill, when a Taiwanese pilot, in an American F-86, brought down a Chinese MiG-17. The Sidewinder entered service in 1956, and has since been the most effective air-to-air missile ever produced. The latest model, the AIM-9X, entered service in late 2003, and thus missed the Iraq invasion. But over the last eight years, the 9X  has been fired in nearly 140 tests, including many that used drone aircraft as targets, and live warheads on the Sidewinders.

 

The first Sidewinder (AIM-9B) was 9.28 feet long, weighed 156 pounds and had a max range of five kilometers . The most current one (AIM-9X) [VIDEO], half a century later, is 9.5 feet long, weighs 191 pounds and has a max range of over 20 kilometers. The AIM-9X can go after the target from all angles, while the AIM-9B could only be used from directly behind the target. The AIM-9X is about seven times more likely to bring down the target than the AIM-9B.

 

The Sidewinder has nearly 300 kills world-wide to date. Thus for every 380 Sidewinders manufactured, only one brought down an enemy aircraft. Only about one percent of all Sidewinders ever even got used in combat. The vast majority of the 110,000 built, spent their careers being carried by fighters, or stored away, waiting for a war. For that reason, the missile is designed for easy upgrades. Many of those in service have some components that are over twenty years old. The missile itself, is more like an aircraft component, than an expendable weapon. The Sidewinder was originally conceived and developed in the shadows and off the books. The U.S. Navy engineers who created it over a ten year period, had to scrounge for money and materials, and many volunteered their labor. The basic concepts of the Sidewinder were developed during World War II, but producing a practical and reliable weapon seemed far beyond current technology. By the end of the 1950s, American air warfare experts believed that the missile was going to replace cannon as the main armament of fighters. That didn't happen right away, but gradually it did.  

 

More powerful AESA radars, and longer range (50-100+ kilometers) missiles like AMRAAM, are put forward as the next revolution in air warfare. These missiles have built in radar, or are guided by the launching aircrafts radar. Unlike heat seeking missiles, these radar guided ones have not had as much combat experience, or success. But as more aircraft are armed with the longer range missiles and radars, more combat will take place between pilots who cannot see each other's aircraft.

 

 

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article ATTRITION: The $40,000 At The End Of The Tunnel


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

mesocyclone    Still need close-in weapons   2/23/2008 1:07:48 PM
As was discovered in Vietnam, policy considerations may force air combat to take place at close ranges, because the ROE's require visual identification of the foe (even though there may in reality be no doubt).

Thus the sidewinder and guns may still be needed.

 
Quote    Reply

doggtag       2/23/2008 3:46:18 PM

..., because the ROE's require visual identification of the foe (even though there may in reality be no doubt).

That's the key: quite often, visual ID'ing of the target, either via pilot's eyes or some sort of electro-optical  or FLIR camera system, to verify exactly that what's being shot at is indeed a genuine threat and not a civilian aircraft.
During the 2004 Olympics, Greece utilized Sidewinder-armed T-6B trainers to patrol the skies, as it was seen as offering some level of just-in-case protection so as to thwart any terrorist activity from the air,
and it was seen as less of a military presence than if combat jets were patrolling.
Argument there could be, a turtboprop could never actually "catch" (pursue) a hijacked jet airliner...but then again, if patrolling in close proximity to the Olympic events, notification from local air traffic control could report the hijacking to the Air Force who then notified the planes to arm their Sidewinders, vectored them to point into the right direction, and give them the go-ahead for a shoot, well enough close to the events to prevent something from happening (in theory anyway: the image of an airliner being shot down in close proximity to civilian areas, highly populated, would bring about a massive PR backlash, despite the fact an aircraft was hijacked and that was the ROEs in effect).
 
The other issue here is, the growing number of UAV systems being developed and deployed around the world.
Do we really need an AMRAAM-sized weapon to bring down UAVs that, in many instances, are physically no bigger than a person?
Unless we develop a new generation of lightweight AAMs, sized between the air-launched Stinger variants (and other air-launchable MANPADS) and Sidewinder-sized AAMs,
then AIM-9-sized AAMs will still continue to find considerable use on the current and future battlefields,
although I expect there will considerable interest in Stinger-sized (or even slightly smaller?) "micro-AAMs", possibly even arming other hunter-killer UAVs, designed principally to tackle the growing threat of battlefield UAVs (except for some of those really small micro UAVs that can be carried, deployed, and controlled by a single person).
 
An anti-UAV AAM (or even mini-SAM) sized for use against most battlefield UAVs wouldn't need a warhead lethality much greater than a hand grenade, nor would it need to be highly maneuverable (20+Gs) like many high performance killers such as Sidewinder and AMRAAM.
It may, however, need to be long ranged enough to fly a dozen km or so, to be able to get from the launch platform to a distant UAV. Just like any missile though, range would depend on launch platform, with higher altitude launches from aircraft capable of hitting UAVs farther away than a surface-launched version of similar size.
 
Perhaps the easiest solution for fielding an anti-UAV missile would be to just 1/3-1/2 scale the Sidewinder design?
The electronics in the current AIM-9X are vast improvements over the bulky tube tech used in the "ancient" -B models,
allowing magnitudes better performance over the early models.
Is there any reason that a Stinger-sized, 1/2-1/3 scale AIM-9 look-alike wouldn't be leaps and bounds more capable than most of the current 1970s-1980s-designed MANPADS in use today?
 
Quote    Reply

Jeff_F_F    Let's not forget economics   9/29/2008 2:57:38 PM
An excellent observation, Doggtag. There is also the economic question of how expensive an AAM do we throw after a UAV that might only have cost a few thousand dollars? At short ranges, I see a role for a weapon such as the 35mm millenium gun. At longer ranges, this might also open a role for mid-high caliber FlaK with terminal guidance capabilities, such as the 57mm Bofors gun. Unfortunately Western forces seem to be developing this new technology from an offensive standpoint--assuming they are the only ones on the battlefield that have it. I don't see a lot of consideration of the defensive side of this--creating the doctrine and technology needed to nullify enemy capabilities. For the current wars that makes sense, but that leaves an opening for a state adversary to exploit the way Germany did in the armored warfare arena in WWII.
 
I've been thinking about an entry on the Armor board about this. I'll continue my thoughts there.
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy