On Point: The North Korean Dictatorship's Tart of the Deal

by Austin Bay
May 16, 2018

Since early March of this year, when North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un told South Korea he would discuss denuclearizing his regime without pre-conditions, everyone familiar with Kim regime behavior has predicted Little Rocket Man and his Pyongyang gang would eventually wiggle, yelp and try to snarl any truly disarming deal.

Here is a sketch of the basic scenario: With the goal of dividing Seoul and Washington, at some point, Kim and his minions would rise to the fuzzy level of goosebumps South Korean hopes of a permanent peace settlement. Then -- after exchanging hugs and bouquets -- one of Pyongyang's leather-faced apparatchiks would threaten to terminate any diplomatic talks.

The North Korean propagandists would gnash teeth, blame U.S. hard line disarmament demands and condemn South Korean, American and Japanese military exercises -- especially those involving strike aircraft flying missions replicating attacks on ICBM launch sites, nuclear weapons storage sites and (shudder) command and control bunkers where North Korean senior leaders cluster and eat brie.

In some shapeshifting fashion, the North would test Trump's threat to walk away from the negotiating table.

Here's a variant scenario with this goal in mind: A Pyongyang stalwart suddenly throws a fit of totalitarian pique as North Korean troops place an ICBM on a launch pad. Then Little Rocket Man himself says, hey, you New York Art of the Deal dotard if you're so serious about denuclearizing poor little North Korea, why not slip us say, five or seven hundred million bucks to cover negotiating expenses? It's cheaper than war. Isn't that how you Queens real estate tycoons handle labor union leaders? 

Alas, this week, reality gave us a less ironic fact set, but one filled with wiggle and yelp nevertheless. North Korea's first vice minister of foreign affairs, Kim Kye Gwan, sharply criticized U.S. national security adviser John Bolton for suggesting that the Bush Administration's framework for denuclearizing Libya was a "template" for denuclearizing North Korea.

Vice Minister Kim sniffed, with anger, that North Korea's nuclear program is far more advanced than Libya's rudimentary program.

Well, that's true. However, his complaint ignored several facts, which is a good indication it was an agitation-propaganda ploy to try to get the Trump Administration to accept something less than complete denuclearization.

Kim chastised Bolton for telling the press that the technical process for denuclearizing North Korea would have requirements similar to those used in Libya -- unrestricted access to sites, verification, removal and disposal of nuclear weapons material and manufacturing capabilities.

Bolton expressed an informed opinion, and North Korea went ballistic, so to speak. Pyongyang canceled planned meetings with Seoul and threatened to cancel the June summit with Trump in Singapore.

South Korean officials reacted coolly, calling the North Korean cancellation "unfortunate." Trump shrugged and told the press he hadn't heard anything official. When asked if his demand that North Korea denuclearize was firm, he nodded and said yes.

The Vice Minister's Complaint could be read as a Freudian slip revealing paranoid Pyongyang's deepest fear: an internal North Korean rebellion. We know Kim Jong Un fears rebellion and coup. He had his half-brother murdered after hearing rumors North Korean expats had asked his brother to help reform the Kim regime. Rebellion connects to Libya. Libyan rebels killed Libya's denuclearized dictator Muammar Gaddafi. If Gaddafi had possessed deliverable nukes he might have stopped foreign states from aiding the rebels, but perhaps not. A dictator fighting an internal rebellion is a distracted man. Threatening to nuke foreign states while battling a domestic coup gives those foreign states a great reason to launch an all-out attack to eliminate the dictator's nuclear weapons. That's all alternative history.

As for current history, North Korea is guilty of poor theatrical timing. Smart negotiators threaten to walk 48 hours (or less) before the talks begin. That gives the deal breaker two news cycles of doom-filled drama.

Read Austin Bay's Latest Book

To find out more about Austin Bay and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.


On Point Archives:

On Point Archives: Current 2020  2019  2018  2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001



Help Keep Us Soaring

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling. We need your help in reversing that trend. We would like to add 20 new subscribers this month.

Each month we count on your subscriptions or contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage. A contribution is not a donation that you can deduct at tax time, but a form of crowdfunding. We store none of your information when you contribute..
Subscribe   Contribute   Close