On Point

Mugabe, Thug on the Loose

by Austin Bay
April 5, 2005

Zimbabwe's dictator Robert Mugabe combines the worst aspects of Cold War and War on Terror tyranny.

Think of Mugabe as an African Slobodan Milosevic. When the Cold War closed down, Milosevic morphed from Yugoslav communist to Serb fascist. As time passed in southern Africa, shape-shifting Mugabe adjusted his schtick, moving from Marx-spouting revolutionary to kleptocrat tribal dictator. Both thugs are ethnic cleansers and cynical thieves who murder rivals, silence the press and brutally intimidate domestic opposition.

There is a major difference: Milosevic is under arrest, while Mugabe continues to destroy a once wealthy nation, while hiding behind a slick PR campaign that co-opts and corrupts classic "human rights" themes.

Mugabe can give Milosevic -- and, for that matter, Russia's Vladimir Putin -- lessons in rigging elections. On March 31, Mugabe stole his third election in five years, making Zimbabwe the world's current leader in charade democracy.

Mugabe and his thugs tried to steal the last one quietly. As elections approached, Mugabe began denying foreign reporters entry visas. He imposed a law that made "unauthorized demonstrations" a felony punishable by up to 20 years in jail -- a law aimed at his democratic opponents in The Movement for Democratic Change (MDC). And then there's the food weapon. Mugabe's government controls Zimbabwe's food supplies. Cooperate, and you get your loaf of bread. Oppose Mugabe, and food's denied.

Ah, but those pesky priests who won't shut up. Mugabe has had to threaten church leaders he deems responsible for "encouraging" street protests. Catholic Bishop Pius Ncube -- a major domestic critic of Mugabe and his dictatorship -- has been a special target.

Ncube predicted last week's election would be rigged, and Ncube was right. The "final tally" gave Mugabe's Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF) 74 seats and the MDC 40

There's no question Mugabe committed mass fraud -- and the MDC has refused to accept the results.

Mugabe may get away with it, breaking the democratic pulse surging through Afghanistan, Ukraine, Palestine, Iraq and Lebanon, and testing the Bush administration's "pro-democracy" doctrine. The man is ruthless, and in the past ruthless has worked. Though Mugabe's ethnic cleansing of the Mdebele in 1980 brought extensive criticism, criticism never became international opposition to his regime. Whenever international outrage builds, Mugabe trots out two themes that have been political trumps for too many African tyrants, "combating colonialism" and "fighting racism." This mantra stymies a fossil segment of the "human rights Left" -- a crowd that railed against Milosevic.

Mugabe also appears to have another hole card -- South Africa's Thabo Mbeki has not played pro-democracy Poland to the Zimbabwe democrats' would-be Ukraine. In fact, Mbeki looks increasingly weak, ineffectual and churlish -- a man who knows he stands in Nelson Mandela's shadow and resents it. Mbeki declared Zimbabwe's elections "free and fair" before the vote. A few commentators conclude this is Mbeki and Mugabe acting out a senescent form of "freedom fighter" solidarity, and it may be just that, another mid-20th century political relic thwarting 21st century democratic change.

Still, international criticism is mounting -- if Kyrgyzstan can rally for freedom, why not Zimbabwe?

What can be done to support the democrats? Any effective military action or political-economic sanctions regimen requires South African cooperation, and Mbeki looks like he's been bought off.

The priests, however, haven't been co-opted. Pope John Paul II's death has kept Mugabe's electoral fraud out of the news cycle, but there is a "John Paul" option that could benefit peaceful change throughout sub-Sahran Africa. The Polish Pope Paul inspired Eastern European resistance to communism and inspired billions with his spiritual and moral leadership. An African pope could do the same for African democrats.

There are signals that this could happen. French Cardinal Bernard Panafieu, when asked about electing a "Third World" pope, replied, "Everything is possible."

An African pope would change the political dynamics in sub-Saharan Africa, and put dictators like Mugabe under insistent global scrutiny -- the first step to putting them all in jail.

Send Link to a Friend
Return to Index For More Austin Bay    

To find out more about Austin Bay and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at


� 1998 - 2018 All rights Reserved.,, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of Privacy Policy