NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Naval Air Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

The Next Naval Aviation Revolution

July 15, 2009: The U.S. Navy is hard at work preparing its X-47B unmanned carrier aircraft, for carrier operations. The new UAV is being put together using, literally, some proven components. This includes the tail hook from the retired F-14, the same tires used on the retired S-3, the brakes used on the F-18 and generators used in the F-22. The X-47B weighs the same as the F-18. The navy plans to use the X-47B for reconnaissance, surveillance and targeting. But it also has two internal bays holding two tons of smart bombs. Many naval officers believe that eventually, once it proves it can operate off a carrier, the X-47B will be used for a lot of bombing. Sort of a super-Predator. The navy has been impressed with the success of the Predator. The 15 ton X-47B has a wingspan of 62 feet (whose outer 15 foot portions fold up to save space on the carrier). It uses a F100-PW-220 engine, which is currently used in the F-16 and F-15.

Many naval aviators have noted how a few UAVs can maintain 24/7 observation over a lot of real estate. That's persistent observation, and it is a big advantage in combat. The submarine and surface warfare communities in the navy are eager to get that. The marines were already seeing persistence in action, when they served in Iraq and Afghanistan. The submariners liked the idea of long range, persistent, UAVs scouting way ahead for them. Then there is the prospect of one-way UAVs that could be launched from a torpedo tube. Suddenly, with UAVs, there are all manner of new possibilities. But it was the carrier community that finally saw the future. The persistent, much longer ranged, UAVs can keep carriers safer, and enable carrier aviation to strike targets much farther away.

Earlier this year, the U.S. Navy  rolled out the X-47B, its first combat UAV (or UCAS, for Joint Unmanned Combat Aerial System). This is part of a six year long, $636 million contract to build and test two X-47B aircraft. The test program calls for first flight later this year, and first carrier operations by 2011. The navy believes that, with aerial refueling, a X-47B can stay aloft for fifty hours. With internal fuel, it can go 2,700 kilometers and return to its carrier. This greatly expands the reconnaissance capability of a carrier.

Five years ago, the X-47A UCAV made its first flight. Development of this aircraft began in 2001. The Air Force was also testing the X-45 UCAV, which also had a naval version (the X-46). The X-45 program began in 1999, and the eight ton (max takeoff weight, with two ton payload) aircraft was ready for operational tests in 2006. The X-46 has a different wing layout, and a range of 1,100 kilometers, carrying a payload of two tons. The X-47A also has a two ton payload and a range of 1,600 kilometers. Unlike the X-45, which is built to be stored for long periods, the X-47A was built for sustained use aboard a carrier. All of these aircraft are very stealthy and can operate completely on their own (including landing and takeoff, under software control). The UCAVs would also be used for dangerous missions, like destroying enemy air defenses, and reconnaissance where enemy air defenses were strong.

The navy has developed auto-pilot software for landing the X-47B on a carrier. In over 10,000 simulations, under a wide variety of sea and wind conditions, the software has never failed to get the X-47B safely down. This is the same simulation software used to test changes to manned aircraft, and has proven very realistic in predicting the performance of the F-18. The navy is confident that the X-47B will be successfully taking off and landing on carriers within two years.

 

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article LEADERSHIP: You Can't Make This Stuff Up


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

trenchsol       7/15/2009 6:29:05 PM
I don't get it. Why UCAV's have so much increased range/persistence ? Does cockpit  weight so much,  or is it space  it occupies ? I mean, the aircraft has the same engines, running on same fuel  as manned one...

DG
 
Quote    Reply

LB    UAV range   7/16/2009 4:47:55 AM
Actually most UAVs have very small engines.   Predator A has a 115 shp engine and the B has a 950 shp.  G Hawk has a 7,000 lb turbofan that is used in long range business jets in sailplane airframe.  UAV's tend to be somewhat and not exactly manueverable.  They are limited airframes performing specific roles.
 
The X-47B has good range but with it's F100 engine it's much more a strike UCAV.   It has a projected range of 1,500 nm according to NG but recall that is with a max internal load of 4,500 lbs.  The bit here about it being airborne for 50 hours is with air to air refueling.  What it can actually do will be seen over the 3 year flight test program which should begin near the end of 2009.
 
It's more than just a weight savings by taking the cockpit and other human related gear out but it allows you to design a smaller airframe.  Note however that the X-47B with an F-16 engine has about the same max take off weight.  It carries no pilot and related systems, it's fuel and limited weapons load is all internal, it's not anywhere as fast or manuevable as an F-16, nor does it carry most of the varied systems of the F-16.  It can do some things better than an F-16 but it's no fighter plane.  Then again it's nice to see Burt Rutan getting to design warplanes.
 
As an aside it's not clear from information available to the public how stealthy the X-47B is nor if the proposed X-47C with 10,000 lb bombload and 172 ft wing span is being pursued or not.  The level of LO is important as NG markets the X-47B as a "first day of the war" strike aircraft which is pretty much what the F-35 does.  If the X-47B costs half the price of an F-35 will the USN want less F-35Cs?
 
Quote    Reply

trenchsol       7/16/2009 11:10:05 AM

The X-47B has good range but with it's F100 engine it's much more a strike UCAV.   It has a projected range of 1,500 nm according to NG but recall that is with a max internal load of 4,500 lbs.  The bit here about it being airborne for 50 hours is with air to air refueling.  What it can actually do will be seen over the 3 year flight test program which should begin near the end of 2009.

So, it is not about amount of fuel, but it is a lack of human pilot who could not endure 50 hours in a narrow cockpit  ?
 
DG

 
Quote    Reply

LB    It's more than one factor   7/16/2009 3:56:52 PM
It's not simply a single factor.  A UAV can be a manned aircraft that is equipped to be flown without a pilot (often used as target drones), a large model airplane with limited range and payload, a purpose built high endurance aircraft with a small fuel efficient engine, etc.  Every aircraft design seeks to achieve certain performance parameters in specific areas. 
 
While manned aircraft do fly missions of 24+ hours that is for larger aircraft with a crew of at least two so someone can rest.  You can't really fly 24+ hour missions with smaller aircraft that would have only one pilot.  So the small to medium UAVs are being designed for long endurance missions that a comparable manned aircraft with one pilot simply can not do.  There is a difference however between a UAV with long range and loiter time vs one with much less but which can be extended with air to air refueling.  As mentioned the X-47B ability to operate for long periods has yet to be established given the 3 year flight test program has not yet begun.
 


The X-47B has good range but with it's F100 engine it's much more a strike UCAV.   It has a projected range of 1,500 nm according to NG but recall that is with a max internal load of 4,500 lbs.  The bit here about it being airborne for 50 hours is with air to air refueling.  What it can actually do will be seen over the 3 year flight test program which should begin near the end of 2009.





So, it is not about amount of fuel, but it is a lack of human pilot who could not endure 50 hours in a narrow cockpit  ?


 

DG




 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       7/16/2009 5:10:59 PM
extended mission UAV's also use teams of controllers on shifts... a good example of a profile where this would be exercised is a BAMs type mission where the bulk of the controller work would be monitoring and mothering.

intimate management might only occur if (eg) an item of interest was identified and the flight profile changed to have a deeper and closer look and go through a series of controlled actions
 
 
Quote    Reply

stbretnco       7/16/2009 6:36:57 PM
Okay, I'm going to get beaten for this comment, and I will probably deserve it.......
 
An article about a revolution in Naval Aviation without [b]ONE[/b] mention of the Rafale?
 
Sacre Bleu!
 

 
 
Quote    Reply

SAE       7/16/2009 8:37:45 PM
So now that Gates has used the F-35 to kill the F-22, how long will it take him to use this UAV to kill the F-35?
 
Quote    Reply

LB    F-35   7/17/2009 4:19:27 AM
The F-35 can not be killed for a whole host of reasons.  How many are built is however something that can change and building less means the rest will cost more.  Unlike the F-35 the X-47B has an entire flight test program to run through before any are ordered.  It's not a replacement for the F-35C.  The USN plans to have a sdqn of F-35Cs in it's air wings.  The X-47B could help replace the F/A-18C/Ds.
 
Now this aside it's entirely possible that down the road someone notes the USAF could replace some F-35A's with an AF version of the X-47B.  The issue in my view would have a lot to do with the relative stealth/LO values of each aircraft- nobody is on record comparing the two and I doubt that information will be forthcoming anytime soon and obviously nor should it.  That said if the X-47B has any significant advantages then the USAF might end up with fewer F-35A's.
 
In any case Gates did not kill the F-22.  He works for the President.  Moreover, it's the Congress who buys things and it's the Democratic Congress that is going to make Gates take more F-22s.  Murtha said today that they will work something out with the White House.
 
So now that Gates has used the F-35 to kill the F-22, how long will it take him to use this UAV to kill the F-35?

 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       7/17/2009 4:27:08 AM
Now this aside it's entirely possible that down the road someone notes the USAF could replace some F-35A's with an AF version of the X-47B. 

One of the future structures for RAAF is a UAV squadron at 2025....  one would think that if we are thinking of a UAS element in our ORBAT at 2025, well, the US will certainly be.... 
 
Quote    Reply

LB    RAAF UAVs   7/17/2009 4:44:49 PM
Just curious but is this for a MQ-1/9 type of aircraft or something like an X-47B?  It's not clear exactly why the RAAF does not already operate a Predator class sdqn nor why they would wait 15 years to do so?  Wouldn't a Predator detachment offer useful direct support of deployed Australian forces today?  Far as I'm aware the Army does not operate any UAVs other than a small manportable one?
 

Now this aside it's entirely possible that down the road someone notes the USAF could replace some F-35A's with an AF version of the X-47B. 




One of the future structures for RAAF is a UAV squadron at 2025....  one would think that if we are thinking of a UAS element in our ORBAT at 2025, well, the US will certainly be.... 


 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy