NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Naval Air Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

3-D Magic

June 27, 2009: For the first time in nearly half a century, the United States is designing a large aircraft carrier from scratch (the USS Ford, CVN-79). Speeding up the process are new tools, particularly computer aided design (CAD). This has been around for decades, but much more powerful computers and much better video graphics, have made it possible to create a 3-D version of the ship with the CAD software, and move virtual people through the 3-D model, and operate the equipment, to make sure everything fit together and was accessible. The CAD software has another big advantage, in that the data files can be emailed to the manufacturers, who use those files in their computer driven fabrication equipment, that bends and machines the metal to the exact specifications.

The existing CVNs, the Nimitz class, are at best half-sisters to each other, since the design gets updated with each new ship. With the Gerald Ford (CVN-78), the likelihood is that the mods to each subsequent ship will be even more noticeable. The later Nimitz updates also used the 3-D CAD technology for the upgrades, so there was already lots of experience with this technology as applied to designing large ships.

 The Ford was supposed to be the first of a radically new, post-Nimitz class of carriers. But that idea was scrapped because the new technology was not quite there yet. So the Ford will be,  like all her predecessors, an evolution on the original USS Nimitz (CVN-68), which entered service in 1975, and the most recent one CVN-77, which entered service this year. But in the many details of a new ship designed from scratch, the Ford will be quite different.

The Ford won't enter service until 2015, and it will have a new hull, a new look topside, and lots of new tech inside. After that, additional Ford class ships are expected to arrive a 5-10 year intervals, and, like the Nimitzs, each will have lots of modifications. In fact, because the mods have been arriving in larger quantities of late, and involving greater changes to the basic ship design. All of this will be largely the result of powerful 3-D CAD software.

 

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article AFGHANISTAN: The Troubles With Traditions


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

J3       6/27/2009 7:52:23 AM
You omit any discussion about the proposed electro magnetic launch system ("EMALS").  The Ford is designed to use it.  There are difficulties, so it may not be ready by 2015.  If those problems persist, then very quickly the Navy will have to redesign the Ford for steam catapults at huge extra expense.  The disgrace here is that the Navy purposely rushed laying the Ford's kiel when they knew EMALS was in trouble to get the ship into the budget system and develop an early constituency. By the time we know whether EMALS will work, the ship's constituency will be so strong in Congress that we will not be able to cancel.  So, we will end up paying about twice as much for the Ford as we would have for the tenth Nimitz up dated with proven improvements.  Is this a great country or what? 
 
Quote    Reply

Scooterboy       6/27/2009 8:28:09 PM
The USS Ford is slated to replace the USS Enterprise in 2015. Does anyone think that the USN will name a new carrier Enterprise in the future?
 
Enterprise is a  proud name in the USN and has been for a long time, but  the Nimitz's (or politician class) of late have all been named, well for Polititcians.
 
Will tradition win or will CVN 65 be the last Enterprise?
 
Quote    Reply

Gerry       6/27/2009 9:36:05 PM

The USS Ford is slated to replace the USS Enterprise in 2015. Does anyone think that the USN will name a new carrier Enterprise in the future?

 

Enterprise is a  proud name in the USN and has been for a long time, but  the Nimitz's (or politician class) of late have all been named, well for Polititcians.


 

Will tradition win or will CVN 65 be the last Enterprise?
 
 I would much rather have the ships named after famous prostitutes than politicians. At least with a prostitute you can get kissed while you're getting your keel hauled.  How about the 'Mata Hari' ,  'Xavieor Hollander' , or even the 'Fanny Hill'. It would certainly give the sailors something worthwhile to fight for.  Who the hell wants to fight for the 'Jimmy Carter'?




 
Quote    Reply

Dave_in_Pa       6/28/2009 10:20:06 AM
"I would much rather have the ships named after famous prostitutes than politicians...Who the hell wants to fight for the 'Jimmy Carter'?"
 
Gerry has an excellent point. Maybe we could donate any ship cursed with that name to Hamas or Hezbollah, who do have reason to love The Peanut.
 
Let's see, there's no lack of other choices: USS Gennifer Flowers (Bill Clinton);  USS Monica Lewinsky (Bill Clinton); USS Chandra Levy (Cong. Rep. Gary Condit); USS Blaze Starr (JFK); USS Judith Exner (JFK)...ad naseum.
 
Quote    Reply

oOOOo    Mighty "I"   6/30/2009 11:23:46 PM
The Intrepid was a worthy name also.
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy