Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
United Kingdom Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Michael Yon: Men of valor. A tribute to the British soldier
Panther    11/26/2007 10:13:49 PM
http://michaelyon-online.com/wp/men-of-valor-part-ii.htm
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Panther       11/26/2007 10:16:40 PM
Men of Valor Part II

First Mission

http://www.michaelyon-online.com/media/images/disp/Brit2/Photo-1.jpg" border=1>[Inside Basra Palace: Telic 9]

To interpret events in al Basra, context is critical. When we invited the British to join us in this war in 2003, the U.S., with the bulk of troops and assets, was the senior partner. In essence, we were the driver of a bus filled with several dozen partners: Poland, Australia, Japan, Georgia, Korea, Albania and so on. Although several key countries had opted to stay home, no nation stepped up to the task like Great Britain, taking responsibility for southern Iraq. But they could not have not planned for the seemingly precipitous and arbitrary decisions made by the mostly American bus drivers in Washington and Baghdad, who took many turns without consulting an accurate map. Egos and strained competencies only magnified and compounded errors. Nobody paid more for these mistakes than Iraqis and Americans, but the Brits and others have also paid tolls for their seats.

Counterinsurgency experts cautioned Coalition members from the outset that military forces would have a limited shelf-life. There can be a finite expiration period during which popular perceptions shift, and liberators become viewed as occupiers, and eventually as malignant beings that must be expurgated. While the American shelf-life in some regions was measured in weeks and months, tolerance for the British was measured in years. But when American stewards made early and notable missteps that extended the war, the British outlived their welcome in the southern provinces.

?We don?t do nation-building,? I remember hearing someone say. But by systematically and in relatively short order demolishing Iraq?s government infrastructure, firing its staff en masse, disbanding its army, our combined militaries in Iraq could only accomplish the mission by rebuilding the country from scratch. While we were making these mistakes and getting ourselves into a serious shooting war around Baghdad and in northern Iraq, some of our British partners made public statements questioning the wisdom of our actions. That the Brits were mostly right was beside the point; their words chafed. Basra was mostly quiet, which was widely taken as evidence of British knowhow, despite how the highly nuanced demographic and historical context could support other plausible interpretations.

http://www.michaelyon-online.com/media/images/disp/Brit2/Photo-2.jpg" border=1>After the invasion in March 2003, Great Britain assumed responsibility for four southern Iraqi provinces: Muthanna, Dhi Qar, Maysan and al Basra (of which Basra is capital). The first three provinces have already been returned to ?Provincial Iraqi Control? or PIC?d. The Coalition still operates in these provinces, but in limited capacities. The final Province under UK administration is al Basra, and it is scheduled ?to PIC? in early December.

By 2007, when the U.S. military had made a rapid metamorphosis and was meeting the insurgency head-on, despite that the transformation was stunning in both speed and outcome, it came too late for the British, whose expiration date in Basra had passed. Increasing tensions in Basra between rival political factions were beginning to undermine an otherwise successful mission in that region. With fewer forces on hand at a time when the British might have been planning final withdrawals, Basra?s many feuding factions galvanized hostilities around a central target: the British.

http://www.michaelyon-online.com/media/images/disp/Brit2/Photo-3.jpg" border=1>As to grumblings about the British cutting and running, we were driving the bus, and had we not taken so many wrong turns, the British mission would likely have ended before their expiration date had passed.

In truth, the British have kept faith with their pledge of partnership, and much more because by overstaying, they jeopardized men, women and mission in order to buy us time and keep the exits covered. America has no truer ally, always there, through bad and worse. Of course, almost none of this mattered to the men of 4 Rifles on May 21, who?d been out more than 13 hours in stifling heat.

As temperatures approached 70° C (around 150º F) inside the armored vehicles, soldiers poured water down their body armor. A driver was naked other than his body armor and helmet,while soldiers in t

 
Quote    Reply

bob the brit       11/26/2007 10:59:47 PM
a long but interesting read panther, cheers for posting it
 
Quote    Reply

Yimmy       11/26/2007 11:02:29 PM
Saxon is a p.o.s anyway.  Not worth risking lives to save that.
 
 
Quote    Reply

StobieWan       12/10/2007 4:35:55 AM

Saxon is a p.o.s anyway.  Not worth risking lives to save that.

 


Re-read the article Yimmy...more a perception thing in taking the gear out of enemy hands to prevent them having the propaganda coup of parading the stuff or whatever. I'm pretty touched by the article in fact - some very brave and professional people we have out there.

Ian


 
Quote    Reply

Yimmy       12/14/2007 5:49:59 PM




Saxon is a p.o.s anyway.  Not worth risking lives to save that.



 




Re-read the article Yimmy...more a perception thing in taking the gear out of enemy hands to prevent them having the propaganda coup of parading the stuff or whatever. I'm pretty touched by the article in fact - some very brave and professional people we have out there.

Ian




Please - I think things in Iraq have moved on a tad further than perceptions.  No point risking someones life just to save a Saxon.
 
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics