Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Dirty Little Secrets Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Why You Can?t Tell Who Was The Best Fighter Pilot Ever
Harold C. Hutchison    6/30/2005 1:06:07 AM


Who was the best fighter pilot ever? This is a question often debated, and never settled. Manfred von Richtoven (better known as the Red Baron of World War I) is one such contender. Another is Erich Hartmann, who is the all-time kills leader with 352 in World War II. Was it David McCampbell, who shot down nine aircraft in a single sortie on October 24, 1944? A case could be made for each of them, but the fact is, one cannot really determine who the best of all time was.

Over 5,400 pilots have become aces, and they have only one thing in common: Shooting down five or more enemy aircraft in air-to-air combat. Not much else exists. In the ninety-one years of air combat (from World War I to the present), the aircraft have advanced from the Sopwith Camel to the F-22. The skills needed to become an ace have changed, and so has the nature of air combat. In the days of Richtoven and Hartmann, many of the kills were with machine guns. This held through the Korean War, but the planes were getting faster through each war (from 190 kilometers per hour for the Sopwith Camel to 635 kilometers per hour for the Me-109 flown by Hartmann to 1,091 kilometers per hour for the F-86F that dominated the skies over Korea). Then, in Vietnam, missiles began to enter the fray, allowing kills to be done from as far as 18 kilometers away with the AIM-9 Sidewinder. Today, the AMRAAM and other missiles allow kills to be made without even seeing the opposing aircraft (from as far as 70 kilometers away in the case of the AMRAAM).

Even during a war, the circumstances faced by these aces were different. Hartmann was in constant combat from 1942 on ? most of it against Russian pilots. This was a contrast to the American practice of constantly sending experienced combat pilots, like John S. Thach (inventor of the ?Thach weave?), back to train new pilots. Thach had only seven kills, but the Thach weave still worked twenty years after the end of World War II, when propeller driven A-1 Skyraiders used it to shoot down a MiG-17 jets.

Other good pilots were shot down (like Thomas J. Lynch, who had 20 kills, Neel Kearby, with 22 kills, and Tommy McGuire, with 38 kills), and killed. Others had tours cut short for other reasons (Tom Lanphier, John W. Mitchell, and Rex Barber had their combat tours cut short after the mission when Lanphier shot down the airplane carrying Isoroku Yamamoto).

Also, very few of these top aces faced their contemporaries. Many of McCampbell?s victims were downed in 1944, when most of Japan?s best pilots had already been killed in battle, and the new ones had been barely trained. The only definitive instance of the top aces of two countries at war facing off in single combat was the dogfight between Randall ?Duke? Cunningham (4 kills for the United States) and Nguyen ("Colonel Tomb") Toon (13 kills for North Vietnam) on May 10, 1972. Cunningham won that engagement, becoming the first American ace of the Vietnam War. The Cunningham-Toon dogfight was also exceptional in that both pilots saw each other and engaged in a dogfight.

United States Air Force studies in the wake of the Vietnam War (the most famous being the Red Baron study) indicated that 80 percent of the pilots killed never knew that they were a target until their killer opened fire. Hartmann estimated that a similar percentage of his victims never knew he was there until he opened fire. The results of Red Baron, which were in keeping with the observations of other American aces, led to the concept of maintaining situational awareness (knowing exactly where you are, and where everyone else is). Probably one of the most valuable tools for American pilots is JTIDS (Joint Tactical Information Data System) ? a datalink that gives the pilot a good situation report, telling him what other pilots (and planes like the E-3) are seeing. Pilots testing JTIDS on the F-15 reported drastic increases in their situational awareness ? in an exercise, they took on F-15s and E-3s without JTIDS, and achieved a 4-to-1 kill ratio in their favor, mostly because the pilots with JTIDS knew where the friendly planes ? and the adversaries ? were, and could sort out who was going to target which ?bandit? a lot quicker than the ones without.

These variables (including the addition of tools like JTIDS) will explain why the best fighter pilot in history will never be determined definitively. One might be able to determine the best of an era or a war (in the case of Vietnam, Cunningham bested the best pilot on the other side), but even then, it will be the subject of debate for years ? as long as there are aviation enthusiasts.


 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Herr Hauptmann    RE:Why You Can?t Tell Who Was The Best Fighter Pilot Ever    7/4/2005 3:39:36 AM
Well in the end result its the number of kills that count. So my vote will be on Erich Hartmann. He may not be the most skilled even in the Luftwaffe, but results are the only substantial measure of one's performance since it is simply the job fighter pilots are tasked to do. Regards.
 
Quote    Reply

smitty237    RE:Why You Can?t Tell Who Was The Best Fighter Pilot Ever    7/8/2005 12:24:51 AM
While I must admit that Herr Hauptmann has a point, I feel that the total number of kills should not be the only standard by which the best fighter pilot is measured. I would dare say that some of the greatest fighter pilots that ever lived served their entire careers without downing a single enemy aircraft. The American naval aviators of the 1980s and 90s were probably the best trained and most highly skilled fighter pilots that have ever flown, but with the exception of a few Libyans, they shot down hardly any hostile fighters. The same could be said of Israeli pilots. They shot down scores of Syrian MiGs in the early eighties, but other than that they served mostly as a deterrent force. That is the true purpose of an effective fighting force. Like the toughest guy on the block, the toughest military rarely has to fight because its enemies are afraid to fight it. Combat is the true test of a fighter pilot's skill, and I believe that the best fighter pilot ever is either retired with few or no kills on his record, or is possibly serving today with little chance of ever proving him(or her)self.
 
Quote    Reply

TwistYou       2/12/2008 5:27:40 PM
 
Quote    Reply

ker       2/13/2008 9:34:12 PM
When you have a group of pilots flying the same planes with the same support against the same enemy (at the same period of the war) you can make some comparisons.  If you have more kills that anyone in your air wing that might mean something.  Even then how you help and train other pilots could still be more help full than kills, maybe. 
 
Quote    Reply

hiker       4/20/2008 8:16:58 PM

While I must admit that Herr Hauptmann has a point, I feel that the total number of kills should not be the only standard by which the best fighter pilot is measured. I would dare say that some of the greatest fighter pilots that ever lived served their entire careers without downing a single enemy aircraft. The American naval aviators of the 1980s and 90s were probably the best trained and most highly skilled fighter pilots that have ever flown, but with the exception of a few Libyans, they shot down hardly any hostile fighters. The same could be said of Israeli pilots. They shot down scores of Syrian MiGs in the early eighties, but other than that they served mostly as a deterrent force. That is the true purpose of an effective fighting force. Like the toughest guy on the block, the toughest military rarely has to fight because its enemies are afraid to fight it.

Combat is the true test of a fighter pilot's skill, and I believe that the best fighter pilot ever is either retired with few or no kills on his record, or is possibly serving today with little chance of ever proving him(or her)self.
Well taken.  John Boyd is probably one of the greatest, but I believe he had no kills.  Essentially, he got into Korea when it was about over and never got into Vietnam combat, probably because he was a little old at that point.  However, at Nellis base, the training area for the elite Air Force fighters during his time, he won practically every simulated combat he engaged in over a period of years.

 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics