the US armed forces actually failed in afghanistan.

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title Newest to Oldest

Pages: 1 2

Herc the Merc RE:the US armed forces actually failed in afghanistan. 10/28/2005 6:03:06 PM

Bi Laden has been laid to rest.

Quote Reply

Panther RE:the US armed forces actually failed in afghanistan. 10/28/2005 6:06:02 PM

Gee, i didn't know that once a taliban soldier was killed he was automatically labeled a civilian! I wonder how i missed that one...

Quote Reply

DarthAmerica RE:the US armed forces actually failed in afghanistan. 10/28/2005 6:45:15 PM

>>>well... if i remember the us army invaded afganies to capture bin laden... but i dont see laden anywhere. some say hes in pakistan. some say hes in iran. and a lot of roumors. i just wanna know one thing wat else americans did in afghanistan except for killing the civilians.<<< ---Sorry but the fact that you are asking these questions means only strong medication could help you.

Quote Reply

MadSkiLlZzzz RE:the US armed forces actually failed in afghanistan. 10/28/2005 7:05:06 PM

well!!!!!!...talibans were posted by the americans by them selves. why to rout them out. because they were not handing over osama bil laden... And one more thing this osama is backed by america as well. wid a such a massive force of amecans and full help of ISI its impossible to think about scott free laden.

Quote Reply

DarthAmerica RE:the US armed forces actually failed in afghanistan. 10/28/2005 7:10:02 PM

Green Aliens from Mars are under your bed. Look, I'm going to offer an olive branch. And just once. And also a little advice. If you are trying to post a flame thread then we will ignore you at best. If you want to get discussion try actually asking non-rhetorical questions. Also if your going to claim something, support it with facts and links. Failing that, your post are a waste of time beyond ridiculing you. Good Luck

Quote Reply

MadSkiLlZzzz RE:the US armed forces actually failed in afghanistan. 10/28/2005 7:32:24 PM

well the reason for invading Afghanistan was to capture bin-laden and sieze alqaeda. till now death toll of american soilders(so called the best) has gone way beyond 20000. neither laden has been captured nor Al-Qaeda has stopped functioning. but yes the main task has been done. lives of innocent people have been taken.

Quote Reply

ProDemocracy RE:the US armed forces actually failed in afghanistan. 10/28/2005 7:59:58 PM

did you mean 2,000? And isn't that the count for the war in Iraq? And it's not that far above 2,000...not that any death isn't bad. Where do you get these stats regarding Afghan? Maybe I shouldn't even bother to ask.

Quote Reply

shek RE:the US armed forces actually failed in afghanistan - Mad 10/28/2005 8:02:18 PM

Mad, Can you post links to where you're getting your "information." I need a good laugh. Thanks.

Quote Reply

Yimmy RE:the US armed forces actually failed in afghanistan - Mad 10/28/2005 8:15:06 PM

To be fair, although the bloke certainly is no diplomat in his use of language, he does have a point - we still don't posess Bin Laden.

Quote Reply

DarthAmerica RE:the US armed forces actually failed in afghanistan - Mad 10/28/2005 8:31:39 PM

>>>well the reason for invading Afghanistan was to capture bin-laden and sieze alqaeda. till now death toll of american soilders(so called the best) has gone way beyond 20000. neither laden has been captured nor Al-Qaeda has stopped functioning. but yes the main task has been done. lives of innocent people have been taken.<<< ---LOL...I love when ignorance is so obvious. The reason for invading Afghanistan was not to capture or kill any one man. The President and other military and political official have repeatedly stated that the reason was to uproot a corupt regime and deprive AQ of its base of operations. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. 20000 dead? Are you mad? Even if that wild A$s number was true. Its within our means to suffer those kinds of loses. In fact only ignorant civilians talk of casualties and Bin Laden. But oh well.

Quote Reply

1 2