Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
United Nations Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: United Nations relevancy
Frankyz    3/15/2003 9:17:29 PM
It seems that if the United Nations is willing to support the US's warmongering attitude, it is risking it's so called "relevancy" and moral authority. I suppose the Americans view UN relevancy as how far they're willing to support the Americans to promote their own interests, and if they don't, they're irrelevant. The Americans are treating the UN as their political playground instead of being a serious forum for political discussion and integration. When the United Nations was allowed to do its job without substantial US involvement, as in Mozambique, the operation succeeded. When the United States felt a political need for the United Nations, as in Haiti, the operation also fulfilled its main objective. But when the United States wanted to appear actively involved while in reality avoiding hard decisions, as in Bosnia, Somalia, and Rwanda, the United Nations was misused, abused or blamed by the United States and the operations failed, tragically and horribly.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
NewGuy    RE:United Nations relevancy   3/16/2003 12:49:02 PM
Hello racist Franky -- more of your crap to shred, lets get started: Bosnia: Dutch UN peacekeepers stood by while men, women and children were pulled away from in front of them, taken away and murdered. Rwanda: The UN, despite urging by the US, declined to engage itself in Rwanda, the result being untold death and misery there. Kosovo: UN refused to act, so the US stops the Serb genocide, and the butcher Milo is toppled. Only after the US uses force to stop the genocide does the UN decide to act. Kuwait, 1991: The US lead the way, both with political and military force, to kick Saddam out of the nation that he invaded and raped. Afghanistan: The US helps to topple the repressive and terrorist Taliban government, no help from the UN offered. Iraq, 2003: The UN (lead by French, German and Russian veto threats) refuses to hold Saddam accountable for his lies and deceit over the past decade, his refusal to destroy all his WMD, and his abuse of the Iraq people. The US and its allies will go in and remove him, despite UN quivering. NewGuy
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics