Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Eternal Wars Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Weak is more dangerous than strong
TriggaFingaz    7/30/2005 12:01:02 PM
Check out this FP piece, which I first saw on Belmont Club: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3098 An illuminating writing that says that the principal threats to American and global security or peace are not the struggles between powerful nations, as during both world wars and the Cold War, but weak, failing states whose governments are too feeble to prevent incubation of terrorism, drug trafficking, illegal arms trading and poverty. The world's powerful nations (USA, China, India, Russia, UK, France etc) are on more or less peaceful terms and prefer to trade, unlike the 19th century when imperial conquests were prevalent. Now, they all have interests at risk becoz of the failure of nations, particularly in Africa and Central Asia. Whatcha all think?
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
bsl    RE:Weak is more dangerous than strong   7/30/2005 10:40:20 PM
There's far too much eagerness to argue in terms of "everything this way". At this moment in history, the most pressing concerns focus, in part, on various non-state actors. Mostly. Remember Iraq and Afghanistan? But, potential problems with China are already visible. And, it's quite clear that the so-called war against terror clearly involves a number of real countries.
 
Quote    Reply

S-2    RE:Weak is more dangerous than strong-The Pentagon's New Map   9/23/2005 4:47:10 PM
Read the "The Pentagon's New Map", by Thomas P.M. Barnett. He explores and expands this notion to the nth degree. A must read.
 
Quote    Reply

jastayme3    RE:Weak is more dangerous than strong-The Pentagon's New Map   5/19/2006 11:17:29 PM
Read the "The Pentagon's New Map", by Thomas P.M. Barnett. He explores and expands this notion to the nth degree. A must read. ------------------------ The fact that the Pentagon has a devious plan doesn't mean anything. The Pentagon has lots of devious plots. The end result of almost all of them is to annoy the secretary who has to shuffle them.
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics