Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
United States Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: The assassination attempt you’ve never heard of
heraldabc    1/25/2011 2:54:56 AM
http://www.glennbeck.com/2011/01/24/the ... -heard-of/ quoted: The assassination attempt you’ve never heard of Monday, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:23 PM EST Why is the media not covering an assassination attempt on Missouri’s Democratic governor Jay Nixon by 22-year-old Casey Brezik? Why has the limited coverage not prompted the same level of speculation as the attack perpetrated by Jared Lee Loughner? Could it be because he’s an anti-capitalist, anti-Christian, left wing crazy person? Glenn had the story on radio this morning from RedState.com: “The rightwing kooks. Okay. ‘22‑year‑old kook Casey Brezik wore a bulletproof vest and charged towards Missouri’s Democratic governor Jay Nixon with a knife and attempted to slash his throat. Now, how is it that we have not heard about this story? ”In light of the media’s race to talk about the rights climate of hateful rhetoric, you probably guessed by now that Casey was an anti‑Christian, anticapitalist leftists who participated in a number of leftwing protests. He’s also diagnosed a paranoid schizophrenic. Luckily for all involved, Brezik was high on pot at the time and so was a little confused. Instead of slashing the governor’s throat, he slashed the throat of a community college Dean he took for the governor.’ A throat was slashed and this isn’t a story. He was going for the governor,” Glenn read on radio. Glenn, however, refused to believe the story unless it was verified by additional sources. “Now, I won’t hear of this story anymore until I have forty sources,” he said. “A man accused of stabbing a Kansas City college official intended to attack Missouri governor Jay Nixon and mistakenly believed he had done so police said Thursday. The suspect, 22‑year‑old Casey Brezik, did not know Nixon and had no particular beef with the governor. But he decided to attack him because he was a top government official, Kansas City police spokesperson Darin Snapp said,” Stu read from The Huffington Post. The article did not mention the political views of Casey Brezik. Glenn could not believe that more news sources were not reporting the story. Pat expressed some disbelief, saying, “It can’t have happened because you know they would have tracked down the violent rhetoric that set him off and they would have done an intensive investigation as to whose violent rhetoric set him off.” Glenn did not want to have any more commentary or discussion until more research came out on the matter. “When you have 39 more sources, you let me know. Because I’ve got real news to report,” he said. ===================================================================== http://www.lakeexpo.com/articles/2010/09/16/top_news/05.txt quoted: Missouri governor was intended target of stabbing at MCC-Penn Valley By Christine Vendel and Mara Rose Williams/The Kansas City Star, Mo. (MCT) Published: Thursday, September 16, 2010 7:02 AM CDT The student accused of stabbing a college dean in the neck Tuesday in Kansas City actually wanted to stab Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon, according to sources close to the investigation. In fact, Casey Brezik thought he had stabbed Nixon -- until police told him otherwise while interrogating him Tuesday night, the sources said. The news that he had wounded a college official, and that the official had survived, disappointed Brezik, the sources said. The 22-year-old Raytown resident hatched his plan after learning that Nixon was to speak at Metropolitan Community College-Penn Valley at 10 a.m. Tuesday, the sources said. Brezik wore a bullet-resistant vest to class that morning. Nixon travels with Highway Patrol troopers. * Brezik did not have a particular beef with Nixon, the sources said, but wanted to harm him because he was a top government official. Nixon arrived at Wheeler Downtown Airport shortly before the 9:35 a.m. stabbing. He canceled his visit to the campus at 3201 Southwest Trafficway. Nixon has been told about Brezik's statements to police, a spokesman said Wednesday night. The spokesman declined to comment beyond that. Diagnosed four years ago with paranoid schizophrenia, Brezik had been attending Penn Valley for only three weeks. Campus officials had not considered him a threat to harm anyone, said MCC Chancellor Mark James. Brezik's relatives have described him as an anarchist, and he ranted about various political topics on his Facebook page. He is accused of stabbing the campus dean of instruction, Al Dimmit Jr., in the hallway outside the computer lab where a lectern had been set up for Nixon's speech about high-speed Internet access projects. Brezik also allegedly nicked James in the chest with the knife as James wrestled with him. In a news conference Wednesday at the college, Dimmitt's son, Andrew, said his father was "recovering well," and that he was "looking forward to returning as soon as he is able to Penn Valley
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
doggtag    A blade attack, huh?   1/25/2011 8:34:07 AM
Guess that explains it: he didn't use a gun, so technically he's not some insane/violent killer....?
 
I supppose, since it wasn't gun-related, he coulda just as soon intentionally hit people with his car,
or wailed on folks with a ball bat...
 
Violence in America is an acceptable happenstance so long as you don't use a firearm to do it, because we all  now it's guns that make people violent.
 
But then again, there's always the insanity plea anymore when you haul off and shoot someone...
 
Nope, no gunfire at work here, people. Nothing more to see, move on.
 
 
(And that's a key problem in our society: how we label what constitutes violence and what doesn't,
and why is it deemed so much more horrific when a gun is the weapon of choice...
I suppose if ricin or some other poisonings ever made headlines again,
the CDC would somehow take the heat for it for not warning us ahead of time that there still are dangers out there
far more deadly than anthrax, and why wasn't something legislative done that shoulda prevented it...)
 
Quote    Reply

heraldabc    Missed the POINT.   1/25/2011 9:41:17 AM
Casey Brezik is another psychopath who acted out his political ponerological myth delusions. He is an almost major
characteristics match one to one in congruence with Jared Loughner.
 
Both were political leftist psychopath community-college-attending drug-abuser social-losers who chose a democrat 'target' (as the face and name of their 'mythical enemies') and bungled their primary attacks.
 
H.
 
 
Quote    Reply

madison    Brezik's Facebook Page   1/25/2011 12:03:22 PM
The reason a 2010 assassination attempt on a Missouri Governor (Democrat)was not reported might have something to do with Brezik not fitting their agenda? One look at his Facebook page and "friends" reveals him to be unemployed, a reader of Al Jazeera, fan of Castro and other dictators, fan of violence, "revolution", agrarianism (forced wealth/land transfer from rich to poor) communism and marxism, self-proclaimed leftist, enjoys watching statue of jesus burn, anti-government, an anarchist that sees an imperialist behind every bush...

I'd file him under crazy but he sounds too coherent so, my guess is that he's an anti-government anarchist. These are our homegrown terrorists that would gladly take up Francis Fox Piven's call to riot in the streets or take violent action. "Action" for them always = violence.
 
Quote    Reply

doggtag    it's all about perspective...   1/25/2011 12:30:22 PM
...but like every other discussion with you,
EVERYONE misses the point when they show that they aren't taking your opinion/perspective as gospel.
 
We live in a 3-dimensional worlds, and we can't go through it looking at everything from a 1-dimensional (one side only) perspective: surely as someone with an engineering background (drafting?), you can appreciate the fact that you can't always see the whole picture/object/outcome when only viewing it from one angle.
 
Whereas you throw all these derogatory labels out there at that which you despise
(or don't understand...people fear that which they do not understand, and ostracism and demonizing it might lead others to sharing your point of view, making you feel less vulnerable and alone when it comes to that which you do not understand...that's human nature and has been going on since time immemorial: it's why we scapegoat and witch hunt to explain away and place blame on things we are to ignorant or too afraid to really face the root causes of: us,
by our very nature of adopting comfort, complacency, and eventually a general malaise of lethargic ignorance,
where we're content with tragedy and injustice so long as it doesn't directly affect us,
and we are free to comment as we see fit, yet at the same time refuse to accept that freedom of speech also means people can freely critique what we said...),
 
...others of us can more easily adapt to those unseen, unpredicted variables that life is laden with,
by trying to more deeply understand why these things happen,
from more perspectives than just labelling them as an obvious outburst brought about
by the bullsh*t our sorry excuse for a political system throws forth on a day to day basis.
 
At some point, each and every person is directly responsible for their own actions (and how they react to a given situation, long term or short term): "they pissed me off" doesn't cut it as an excuse when randoming gunning people down any more than here when someone doesn't agree with your point of view and they get D-listed by your measurement standards.
 
"....political leftist psychopath community-college-attending drug-abuser social-losers who chose a democrat 'target' ...."
 
Such colorful insults.
 
Like whatever issues Loghner had (and Cho, Hinkley, Oswald, Princip, Booth, Burr, hell Herod even, go back as far as you like),
how, who, and what amongst our society is fit to judge who is mentally disturbed, who is insane, and who knew perfectly damn well what they were doing when they did it?
In the US, we obviously aren't afraid to admit that our mental health industry isn't so perfect in treatment after all
(how many Hollywood big mouths go thru rehab countless times?),
wherein we base people's worth (how worthy are you to even receive adequate treatment) on their financial status moreso than any potential they could achieve (doesn't help that many school systems stifle the use of aptitude tests to gauge a child's natural abilities...too often, we'd rather see our children abandon frivolous pursuits solely on the grounds of pursuing the highest net income they can acquire).
 
So we end up with folks who can't get an adequate diagnosis for what ails them,
let alone how can we even guarantee the physicians they sought help from are even competent enough in a proper diagnosis
(phrases like "second opinions" and "malpractice" exist for a reason),
and even if we do, what happens when we choose not to accept what they're telling us is wrong (is it a genuine phycial issue that can be corrected, a psychosomatic manifestiation brought on by messed up brain or body chemistry, or is it "all in your head" after all...) ?
 
The system is broken.
There is no guarantee that those who NEED help can get the PROPER help that actually remedies the situation rather than antagonizes it further.
We can watch that on those shows that talk about a patient suffering an ailment and go through countless physicians before they finally find one who properly identifies what specifically physically is causing their distress, without them being labeled a "head case" who just needs to "accept their problems, get over it, and get on with their lives".
 
There was no more guarantee that adequate mental health counseling in time was going to help these guys, and many others before, and certainly many others to follow, no guarantee that it was going to be the problem solver, because there's no guarantee the patients an
 
Quote    Reply

madison    Casey Brezik's address   1/25/2011 1:04:30 PM
You're gonna love this. Anarchists want you to cheer him up. Aww.

 
Quote    Reply

madison    Casey Brezik's address   1/25/2011 1:06:46 PM
in case the link doesn't work, it's at anarchistnews,org.

"We now have the address of Casey Brezik, accused anarchist assassin. Please write to him and let him know that he's not forgotten. The jail he's in will only let him receive standard size postcards. If people want crazy shit to happen, then we should be supporting people when crazy shit goes down. Send him a postcard today!"

Casey Brezik
Jackson County Detention Center
1300 S. Cherry St.
Kansas City, MO 64106

 
Quote    Reply

heraldabc       1/25/2011 1:10:34 PM
Not so is it ego. I simply ask you to distinguish between the periphery and center of the posited thesis.

I could care less about the method the psychopath committed his attempted political assassination. I am interested in why the incident reports did not rise to level of notice, that would indicate that there is an undercurrent of insanity and hatred being generated by the American power elites in the political discourse.

 
What you suggest is extraneous to the main question unless you can introduce a 'gun control political myth' into the general 'political enemy' myth that is at the heart of the current 'big lie' that shapes the ruling class' mindset that they also foist on the citizen polity.
 
You might start with the Chicago Thug's famous secret speech and "the bitter clingers to their bibles and guns." statement he made in it, and start your  corollary case that way.
 
Just a suggestion.
 
H.   

 
 
Quote    Reply

heraldabc    Follow up.   1/25/2011 1:35:25 PM
"....political leftist psychopath community-college-attending drug-abuser social-losers who chose a democrat 'target' ...."
 
Such colorful insults.

Are those insults?

Leftist- political philosophy that modally drove those psychopaths.
community college attending. Facts reported.
drug abuser- both convicted drug offenders-also reported.
social losers (opinion) people who cannot empathize and who are alienated from an empathic social norm are losers in the social contract. They usually find employment and face to face friendships to be difficult. They lacjk the empathy and imagination to see other Human beings as  worthy of love, respect, and admiration.

So where is the insult?

As to blaming the part, well, that is not what I did. I said these two psychopaths were crazy and in Loughner's case  should have been locked up. Brziik should have been locked up too, once he displayed public violence and was diagnosed.

Do I blame the system? No. I blame the two psychopaths. I hold them accountable. Once you have been diagnosed as mentally ill, and refuse to seek help, and you know that you need help, it is on you as to responsibility.  
 
There is this caveat, mental health care in this country has collapsed. To that very limited extent I will concede that there is system failure.      

Having said that, though, you might ask as a hypothetical what kind of myth was created to destroy the previous public health system that we had in place prior to the 1960s when 'government health care' became a proposed  civil right?

Ponerology covers that too.
 
H.
 
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics