Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
United States Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: DeMint: Republicans Need to Heed the Call of the Tea Party
CJH    11/7/2010 12:03:57 PM
I have already read of comments attributed to Lindsey Graham and to Trent Lott to the effect that it was a mistake to have, in the some losing races, candidates such as Christine O'Donnell as the Delaware senatorial nominee rather than such candidates as Mike Castle. The argumant seems to go that, in the case of the Delaware race, "we" would have a Republican representing Delaware had Castle won the primary race. That may be true. But such arguments as attributed to Lott would indicate that some Republicans have learned nothing over the last decade. If I can presume to speak for Tea Party types, going the GOP establishment way is how we got where we are now with a winked at liberal Democrat instigated financial meltdown on a GOP establishment watch plus the Dem. controlled Congress plus a Dem. White House plus all the bad legislation the liberals were able to ram through plus the indebtedness plus the historically high umemployment (Job security for GOP establishment types?). The GOP failed in its fiduciary responsibilities by allowing the Dems to run wild. So, doing it Graham's and Lott's way is a non-starter for the fired up voters of this election cycle. Better to vote for the liberal Democrat or to not vote at all than to vote for people who are not true to their own professed values. If the leftist wins, the leftist's own record will be the most persuasive argument for conservatism as I predicted would be Obama's record would. So, the arguments of the GOP establishment are ultimately directed to turn people off so that they don't participate in the electoral process. I.e. they are characteristically elitist in spirit. DeMint: Republicans Need to Heed the Call of the Tea Party
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
CJH       11/7/2010 12:34:11 PM
I realize of course that the actual event of the meltdown occurred almost two years into the Dem. control of Congree and that the GOP increased the size of government.
 
But I could see in 2005 the the GOP was throwing away its formal control of Congress and I believe the meltdown was being predicted then. And let's face it, Democrats are famously and habitually irresponsible. They are not the adults.
 
Quote    Reply

Jimme       11/9/2010 3:29:48 AM
If the GoP had actually worked and help some of these candidates instead of being sore losers and whining then they could have very well come out on top. The RNC really needs to decide if it wants to be relevant in the coming future because they need to reallise that the days of the good ol'boys are over. The people are paying attention and they are tired of it.
 

 
Quote    Reply

YelliChink       12/6/2010 1:54:55 PM
 
[quote]
Elite commentators tend to dismiss the Tea Party as a mob of engaged boos. On the contrary, pollster Scott Rasmussen, reports, the Tea Partiers tend to be older than 45, married, wealthier and better educated than the general population, and concerned first of all with federal spending and deficits. The most important thing to know about such people is that there are more of them than ever before in American history.

...
 
In 1975, when Jimmy Carter ran for president, 39 out 100 Americans were dependent children, but only 16 out of 100 Americans were dependent elderly. The baby boomers were in their twenties and starting families. Once elected president, Carter allowed the inflation rate to reach double-digits by 1981. A family that bought a house for $60,000 in January 1975 could have sold it for $110,000 in January 1981. In fact, home prices offered positive returns after inflation (stocks, bonds, and cash all showed negative real returns during the 1980s).

Elderly people on fixed pensions took part-time jobs or ate pet food as the value of money shrank; young people caught a free ride on the inflation wave. No one liked inflation, to be sure, but it was an ill wind that blew good to a great many people. The Carter administration, though, made an elementary blunder: as inflation drove up nominal income, it also pushed middle class taxpayers into higher tax brackets intended to soak the rich. With a top tax rate of 70%, the tax squeeze due to inflation became a crushing burden on the middle class, and the high rate of taxation on nominal capital gains was often
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics