Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Surface Forces Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Does the U.S.N. use the anti-ship tomahawk or not?
jessmo_24    12/18/2006 2:41:39 AM
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htsurf/articles/20061217.aspx I have heard somewhere that its not in use any more. Isnt the possible to use the block 4 for anti-ship duty?
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: 1 2
Rasputin       2/11/2007 6:15:08 AM
Herc the Merc has already posted that there will be a lighter aircraft launched Bramos supersonic missile, don't know if it will be ready.



 
Quote    Reply

Galrahn       2/11/2007 7:39:40 PM

I would not expect the US Navy to develop a super sonic anti-ship missile anytime soon.

The latest Harpoon block is one of if not the very best anti-ship missile in the world. It is not only virtually impossible to detect at launch, it is one of the most difficult missiles to track OTH even with the most modern radar systems. Why replace a missile thought to be at least in the top 3 of its type?

I am starting to think the Brahmos is one of the most overrated missiles produced since the Sunburn. In the end I think the latest Harpoons and latest Exocets kill the Brahmos on the foreign sales markets.   
 
Quote    Reply

Galrahn       2/11/2007 7:42:33 PM

Isnt the possible to use the block 4 for anti-ship duty?
Yes.

Specific details as to why are mostly classified, but in the US military munitions guide which is not classified the RGM-109E is listed as a weapon that can be utilized in the anti-ship role.
 
Quote    Reply

gibbsrg    gibbsrg   9/19/2009 7:49:24 PM
What smaller missiles like the harpoon and exocet lack in speed and warhead size is offset to a large degree by the number of platforms that can carry them.  Big Russian missiles generally need big ships and planes to carry them.  Yes, the are air-launched versions of some of them, but how many can a fighter-sized plane carry?  One perhaps?  Harpoons and exocet type missiles can be carried on pretty much anything your navy owns.  This is especially true of the small missile boats, that typically mount 4-8.  Try putting a sunburn or similiar sized missile on one of those vessels.  You have to design ships around those bigger missiles.  Harpoons and like missiles can be back gitted to anything.  Versatility is the small, subsonic missile's strength.  That's why even Russia still makes them.  Picture a dozen super hornets with 4 harpoons each bearing down on a Chinese task force from 400miles out.  Bye-bye!!  Sovremmny (I don't feel like looking up the proper spelling right now..lol) and sunburn won't save you now!
 
Quote    Reply

LB    RGM-109E   9/20/2009 1:39:48 AM
To answer your question yes the RGM-109E can hit moving targets and Raytheon announced a few months ago that they were going to improve the capability of the RGM-109E vs ships.  How good an anti surface missile it actually is a rather open question.  It's certainly not purpose designed although it has been speculated that it can hit specific parts of a ship.
 
In any case it's interesting to imagine the USN running out of aircraft or submarines to sink an enemy surface ship and then having to rely on a long range cruise missile.  It's also worth asking what is the range of the SM-2/RIM-66 in anti surface mode given every USN surface ship that can carry RGM-109 already has SM-2.  During Operation Praying Mantis the USN in one engagement fired 3 Standard missiles against an Iranian FAC, which stopped it, and later 1 Harpoon.  One Iranian Frigate was sunk by A-6's and another stopped in the water by A-6 which we then allowed Iran to tow home.   The USN has many tools that can sink ships.
 
Quote    Reply
1 2



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics