hmmmmm and yet we dont see hindus strapping bombs and killing innocents women and children....allah hu akbar ..!!!

>>hmmmmm and yet we dont see hindus strapping bombs and killing innocents women and children....allah hu akbar ..!!!<< wait wait wait…. http://indianterrorism.bravepages.com/burnt2.jpg Charred bodies of Muslim children... the real face of secular India http://indianterrorism.bravepages.com/burnt1.jpg Bodies of Muslim children burnt to death by Hindu fanatics. http://indianterrorism.bravepages.com/burnt3.jpg Muslim children doused with gasoline and set on fire by Hindus in India, "the world's largest democracy" . http://indianterrorism.bravepages.com/charred%20bodies%20of%20muslims.jpg The bodies of dozens of burned innocent Muslim women and children http://indianterrorism.bravepages.com/charred%20bodies%20%202.jpg Muslims doused with gasoline and set on fire by Hindus in India, "the world's largest democracy" ... http://indianterrorism.bravepages.com/52riot_ahmadabad_ahsan_jafri.jpg The name plate of Ahsan Jafri lies in the charred ruins of his house in Ahmedabad, India. Mr jafri, a prominent Muslim politician, was killed along with many others at his house by a violent Hindu mob while Indian police personnel present didn't do anything to stop the massacre. http://indianterrorism.bravepages.com/charred%20bodies%203.jpg The fate of Muslims in India... http://indianterrorism.bravepages.com/ahmedabad_hindu_rioters.jpg http://indianterrorism.bravepages.com/hindu%20terrorist.jpg Hindu mother chod thirsting for Muslim blood http://indianterrorism.bravepages.com/hindu%20women.jpg http://indianterrorism.bravepages.com/mob.jpg Hindu mob burning Muslim property http://indianterrorism.bravepages.com/sadhu%20and%20cop.jpg Partners in crime, taking a break from the killing orgy ... A sadhu offers tea to a policeman in Ahmedabad on Saturday, March 02, 2002. — Reuters photo More: http://indianterrorism.bravepages.com/gujarat%20pictures%201.htm http://indianterrorism.bravepages.com/gujarat%20pictures%202.htm http://indianterrorism.bravepages.com/gujarat%20pictures%203.htm http://indianterrorism.bravepages.com/gujarat%20pictures%204.htm http://indianterrorism.bravepages.com/gujarat%20pictures%206.htm

in K2 NICE STORY ONLY SOME MADRASSA BROUGHT UP IDOITS WOLD BELIVE IN SUCH BULL. NOW STOP WEEPIN' AND TRY TO GIVE SOME NUTERAL LINKS TO JUSIFY UR BS NEXT TIME. OH NO!!! DON'T STOP WEEPIN' READ MY POST "HAVE U READ UR...." AND CONTINUE WEEPIN" OVER THE DUNG PIT U HAVE FALLEN INTO ASSHOLE.

well... islam got a taste of its own medicine. this is the new world order. kill 50 hindus/jews/christians/buddhists ... we kill 3000. this aint the 7th century arabia. we will bury you alive ...screw mohammad and screw allah... we dont care

...Hindu Gandu Shiva Raped many married women resulting in his Lingam being cut off by Gandu Bramha as a punishment and also to stop him for longing to have sexual gratification from any of the Rapes. Gandu Bramha is known to have raped a jungle bear, sexually molested Gandu Shiva's wife (Parvati),ejacu;lated at the sight of parvati's thighs, Raped his own daughter Sarswati and is holding her captive and claiming her as his wife (Ghar ki murgi). Gandu Ganesh ( who hindus now claim drinks milk from the utensils)was found in bed with his mother Parvati resulting in Gandu Shiva cutting off his head and replacing it with Elephant's head. Gandu Vishnu, Gandu Bramha, Gandu Shiva all conspired to Rape a married woman. Gandu rama's father did not have any sexual gratification either, hence he gave his wife to three hindu sages/gurus for a night and they too did not have any gratification but were able to ejaculate from whom rama was procreated. Rama was later found to be not eligible to rule Ayodhya since he was produced by a bastard act and since Ram did not have the King's (Father's) blood flowing in him. These are the hindu gods, one mother one sister one daughter chod. They cursed eatch other, hate each other. Imagine, this religion teach what?.... And so did the Greek, Roman, NOrse, Russian et al deities as well. SO what's your pathetic point? Must be something about the sons of Aryas, isnt there? The POINT is - is that YOUR filthy swine of a pedophile false prophet - Mohammy - did these things as WELL, therefore setting the low bar standard of behaviour that all proper male muslims should emulate. Now YOU go and tell the rest of us that other religions do that as a matter of policy. There is a BIG difference between the mumbo-jumbo garbled mythologies, legends and stories, AND actually reenacting the deeds and lives. Seems you guys have the mohammed rapist, mohammy pedophile, and mohammy thug things down pat. Nice job, ace. swhitebull - what a dik-for.

Like i have said before, these muslim dogs are pathetic. Their religion is so backwards and corrupt that htey have to make stuff up to cobmat the facts of their religion. We have quoted their holy book(which is very useful for toilet papaer these days) and they have no way to respond...so they jsut make up crap about superior religions(Hinduism, Judaism, Christianity) and post it everywhere.

me and my jewish/christian friends from USC used to actually use the quran as toilet paper..haha i have some pics too... i'll post them on some site when i have time... the satanic ty verses....

'>Like i have said before, these muslim dogs are pathetic. Their religion is so backwards and corrupt that htey have to make stuff up to cobmat the facts of their religion. We have quoted their holy book(which is very useful for toilet papaer these days) and they have no way to respond...so they jsut make up crap about superior religions(Hinduism, Judaism, Christianity) and post it everywhere.

Typical illiterate inferiority complex ridden Hindus smuggling their inferior religion into the major big religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. For your information these 3 religions are the one and same and all originated in the middle East and share cultural heritage and prophets , same how Hinduism and Sikhism are related.

# Hindu god Brahma raped his own little 6 year old daughter Saraswati and was a sex maniac and pervert who was guilty of Rape, pedophilia and sexual molestation,
Brahma raped his own 6 year old daughter Saraswati not once or twice but several times and also begetted children with her.

Here's proof from Hindu holy books
"Brahma’s daughter Sarasvati said to herself,“After begetting me from his own body, how could he copulate/have sex with me? I know, I’ll hide myself.’ So she became a cow. But he(Brahma) became a bull and copulated/raped her. From their union cattle were born. Then she became a mare, and he a stallion; she became a female donkey, and he, a male donkey. And again he copulated with her, and from their union one-hoofed animals were born. Then she became a female goat, and he, a male goat; she became an ewe, and he, a ram. And again he copulated with her, and from their union goats and sheep were born. In this way he created every male and female pair that exists, down to the very ants.… Then he churned like this and, using his hands, produced fire from his mouth as from a vagina. As a result the inner sides of both these — the hands and the mouth — are without hair, for the inside of the vagina is without hair.”
-Brhadaranyaka Upanisad 1:4:2-6.

Rape of 6 year old daughter Saraswati and Incest and perpetual lies by Hindu god Brahma is attested in various ancient holy Hindu books.

“On seeing his daughter Padma (Sarasvati), Brahma was very much moved. He looked at the beauty of his daughter. He wooed his daughter and wanted to have intercourse. How could a daughter give consent to one’s own father? Padma refused. Brahma did not give up his desire. He began to quote the Vedas to his daughter to make her realise that there is nothing wrong in enjoying with anyone, anytime, anywhere for the sake of giving birth to a child”:

“Mathara Mupathya, susara mupaithe, Puthrartheetha
Sagamarthi, Napathra loka, nasthee thath.
Saravam paravo vindu ha, dasmath Puthrar tham
Matharam suransathee Rahathee.”

This is the Sanskrit sloka Brahma quoted to his daughter. He explained to his daughter, that for the sake of a child one can enjoy with one’s own sister or daughter, as per the authority of the sacred Vedas composed by Brahmin scholar.
Brahma's Incest With Sarasvati
The savage Vedic Aryans who invaded India practiced widespread incest,
cannibalism, sati and other barbarities. It is hence no surprise that the main
Vedic god also displayed animal characteristics. He had incest with his own
daughter, an act that is perfectly legal in Vedic law :


" Brahma is one of the 3 main gods - Trimurti - of the Hindu pantheon. He is
the creator of the universe. Sarasvati, who became the wife of her own father,
was the daughter of Brahma. There are 2 stories about her genesis in the
`Saraswati Purana'. One is that Brahma created his beautiful daughter Saraswati
direct from his `vital strength' or seminal fluid. The other is that Brahma
used to collect his semen in a pot whenever he masturbated fixing his
carnal eyes on the celestial beauty Urvasi. Brahma's semen in the pot gave
birth to the sage Agastya, and Agastya in turn gave birth to Saraswati. Thus,
Saraswati had no mother.
" This daughter or grand-daughter of Brahma is the Hindu goddess of learning.
When Brahma saw the beauty of Saraswati he became amorous. To escape from her
father's passionate approach Saraswati ran to the lands in all four directions,
but she could not escape from her father. She succumbed to Brahma's wish.
Brahma and his daughter Saraswati lived as husband and wife indulging in incest
for 100 years. They had a son Swayambhumaru and a daughter
Satarupa. THrough the incest of Brahma's son and daughter Brahma got two
grandsons and two grand-daughters."
( Kovoor, p.76 )

The legend is given in the following `sacred' Vedic texts ( Spellman, p.28 ):

Aitareya Brahmana.III.33
Satapatha Brahmana.I.7.4.1ff; XIV, 4.2.1ff;
Matsya Purana.III.32 ff;
Bhagavata Purana.III.12.28ff.

Justification of Incest
In all these `holy' scriptures, this act of unrestrained incest is justified
and upheld as a legal act !

" Brahma followed Savitri [ Sarasvati ], married her, and they lived together
in a lotus for one hundred years. The Purana [ Matsya ] then points out that no
question arises regarding prohibited acts of the gods since they do not reap
the fruits of their karma (actions) as do mortals. A further justification of
Brahma's action is given by noting that Brahma is the lord of the Vedas and
Savitri is the goddess of the Vedas. They therefore are
inseparable, and to unite the Vedas with the sacred prayer can surely be no
evil."
( Spellman, p.30 )
However, the Vedas, which carry far more authority than the Puranic and
Brahmanic texts cited above, enjoin this practice. Incest, far from being a
`corruption' introduced after the Vedic Dark Ages, was thus a common practice
during that age of barbarism and illiteracy, and is a Hindu institution
perfectly sanctioned in the Vedas.

Vedic Sanction of Incest
One of the most irrefutable facts proving that Hinduism is evil right at its
very foundation is the fact that the Vedas justify the beastly act of incest as
a `sacred act'. This was no doubt an outcome of the strict practice of
`brahmacharya' which produced hoards of sexually starved psychopathic sadhus.
It is these mad sadhu Brahmins, the authors of the concocted Vedas, who
justified and legalised incast. Indeed, the Vedas enjoin incest as a kind of
marriage. This fact was utilised by Brahma when convincing his daughter
Sarasvati (also known as Padma) to succumb to his unlimited lust :

" 8. On seeing his beautiful daughter Padma, Brahma was sexually excited. He
wooed his daughter and wanted to copulate with her. How could a daughter give
consent to her own father? Padma refused. Brahma could not give up his desire.
He began to quote the Vedas to convince her that there was nothing wrong in
having sex with anyone, anytime, anywhere for the sake of giving birth to a
child. "
-- ( Puran )
This is the Vedic verse in Sanskrit which justifies incest and which was quoted
by Brahma :
“Mathara Mupathya, susara Mupatithe, Puthrartheetha.
Sagamarthi, Napathra loka, nasthee thath.
Saravam paravo vindu ha, dasmath Puthrar tham.
Matharam suransathee Rehathee”
- ( Veda, cited in Puran )
Tranlated this verse means
" For the sake of a child one can enjoy his own sister or daughter, without any
sin attached to it. "
( Puran )
There are other abundant examples of incest from the Vedic age. These prove
that the Vedic Aryans regularly practiced incest of the father-daughter type
and the brother-sister type ( Sita ). Moreover, the Vedas fully legalise this
abominable practice. These evil practices continued right throughout the
Brahmanic Dark Ages of 2599 years (1500 BC - 1000 AD). Thus, for example, Rama
maried his sister Sita when she was still only 6 years old ( Sitaram ).


Brahma's Beatiality with a Bear
Brahma, the main god of the Vedic religion, was so lecherous that he was not
satisfied with his own daughter. In fact, feelings of lust crept up when he saw
even females of animal species ! He was so frustrated that he copulated with a
bear :
" 11. Brahma started roaming about in forests. He happened to see a female bear
in a bush. Brahma would not leave it. He went straight to the bear. The female
bear yielded to Brahma’s lust. God Brahma enjoyed the bear, and a human being
with the head of a bear was born. He was called Jambu Vandan, the son of
Brahma.
( Puran )
Other examples of beastiality abound. The Vedic Ashvamedha involved the Chief
Hindu Aryan Queen copulating with a dead horse ! Rama's mother herself
copulated with a dead horse during the asvamedha ceremony of King Dasaratha,
after which she was handed over to the disciples of the officiating Brahmin,
one of whom fathered Ram. Thus, Rama was illegitimate ( Mother ) ( Ram ).
Brahma is a God whose one head tells lies:

“Brahma desired Sarasvati and went to her, asking her to stay with him. She, being his daughter, was furious at this and said, ‘Your mouth speaks inauspiciously and so you will always speak in a contrary way.’ From that day, Brahma’s fifth head always spoke evilly and coarsely. Therefore one day when Siva was wandering about with Parvathi and came to see Brahma, Brahma’s four heads praised Siva but the fifth made an evil sound. Siva, displeased with the fifth head, cut it off. The skull remained stuck fast to Siva’s hand, and though he was capable of burning it up, Siva wandered the earth with it for the sake of all people, until he came to Benares.” — Siva Purana, Jnanasamhita 49:65-80.

How can Hindus knowingly worship gods (not humans) telling lies and committing rape of their own little daughters and incest???

this is from the religion of perverts sex maniacs who created kamasutra, what else do you expect.

# Their are extremely disgusting and obscene barbaric rituals in Hinduism which are signs of a very uncivilized Aryan Hindu society. Hindus worship their God Shiva's Half cut Penis called ‘Shiv Ling’ along with ‘Yoni’ which means Hairless Vagina in SANSKRIT.

# Hindu holy book Manusmriti says that ancient Hindu Gurus,Sadhus and Men were so pervert that they used to get horny by looking at their own mothers and sisters, here's proof from Manusmriti:
“Matra swastra ………..” – 2/215. "people should avoid sitting alone with one’s mother, daughter or sister Since sexual/carnal desire is always strong, it can lead to temptation." Hahaha uncontrollable perverts that are Hindus and their God's and rishi's.

# Hinduism has a branch called tantricism which says the Hindu Gods, both male and female Gods, used to savagely drink blood mixed with sperm/semen. Male God's performing the uncivilized act of drinking blood and semen together also points towards Homosexuality and Gayness of such God's.

“The body of every living creature is made of semen
and blood. The Gods [deities] who are fond of sexual pleasure drink semen and blood.”
White Kiss of the Yogini, page:72.
Page Number 278, Hindus an alternative History by Wendy Doniger


# “Hindu Goddess Durga in ancient paintings and sculptures/statues is depicted with her tongue sticking out which is due to her depiction in Hindu holy mythological scriptures story of her extending her tongue to lick up each
drop of the sperm/semen along with blood of Men such as a mythological character ‘Raktabija’s’ sperm and blood before it can fall to the ground.”
Padma Purana 1.46.1-32, 47-108, 119-21; Skanda Purana 1.2.27-29 (Doniger
O’Flaherty, Hindu Myths, 251-61); Matsya Purana 154-57.
“The long tongue of the goddess Kali,
like that of the female antigod Long Tongue, the bitch that licks up the oblations, is the upward
displacement of her excessive vaginas, a grotesque nightmare image of the devouring sexual
woman, her mouth a second sexual organ.
“Drinking
blood and sperm/semen mixed together is a very Hindu Tantric thing to do. In one of the Puranic antecedents of the Hindu
Tantras, “Glorification of the Goddess,” the goddess Chandika came up against an antigod that
was actually named Blood Semen/Sperm (Raktabija), from every drop of whose blood and semen/sperm a new antigod appeared. To conquer him, Chandika created the goddess Kali and
instructed her to open wide her mouth and drink the blood as well as the constantly appearing
progeny of Blood Sperm/Semen; then Chandika killed him. The goddess Kali effectively aborts the birth
of offspring of Blood Seed/Sperm/Semen by prophylactically swallowing his sperm/semen/seed simultaneously along with the drops of his blood.
In other Puranas, the goddess Kali emits multiforms of herself who extend their tongues to lick up each
drop of the sperm/semen-blood before it can fall to the ground.”
-Padma Purana 1.46.1-32, 47-108, 119-21; Skanda Purana 1.2.27-29 (Doniger
O’Flaherty, Hindu Myths, 251-61); Matsya Purana 154-57.
-Page Number 278, Hindus an alternative History by Wendy Doniger

“The long tongue of the goddess Kali,
like that of the female antigod Long Tongue, the bitch that licks up the oblations, is the upward
displacement of her excessive vaginas, a grotesque nightmare image of the devouring sexual
woman, her mouth a second sexual organ.
But it is not semen-blood but female blood (together with male semen rather than male
blood) that plays the central role in the Hinduism Tantras. The menstrual blood of the female participant is
connected to the polluting but life-giving blood of the menstruating goddess, which flows to the
earth each year, and the blood of her animal victims, decapitated and offered in sacrifice.”
-Page Number 278, Hindus an alternative History by Wendy Doniger

# Drinking and Licking Semen/Sperm along with menstrual blood was very common among ancient Hindus and their deities/Gods, read the proof from ancient Hindu Holy books below:
“Not just the goddess Kali, but also the Yoginis, a horde of ravishingly beautiful, terrifying, and powerful
female deities, participated in the drinking of the sexual fluids such as semen/sperm and menstrual blood. These Yoginis were often
placated with blood offerings and animal sacrifices but also propitiated by exchanging sexual
fluids such as semen/sperm along with menstrual blood with the male practitioners and by consuming those fluids (as well as other prohibited
foods).
White, Kiss of the Yogini,
Page Number 278, Hindus an alternative History by Wendy Doniger

# When a well educated scientists and British official came to India and studied its culture and behavior he wrote in a letter/diary dated October 2,
: “ The Hindoo/Hindu appears a being limited to mere animal functions, and even in them indifferent, with no higher intellect than a dog.”
Marquis of Hastings

British instead preferred Mughals,Turks,Persians and Arabs to Hindus (Hindus here meant ethnicity of everyone living in Hindustan prior to Middle Eastern and Central Asian Invasions and wasn't used for referring to the conglomerated name of various faiths followed in Indian Subcontinent )
“Despite their assimilation to a Hindu class, the British tended to prefer the company of
Muslims to Hindus for a number of reasons: Muslims were, like them, the rulers of India; they
were better horsemen than the Hindus; Islam was a monotheism that revered the Hebrew Bible
and the Christian New Testament; and it was quite easy to convert to Islam, much easier than to
convert to Hinduism.”
Page No. 374 Hinduism an alternative History.

# There is an ancient Hindu ritual of raping dead horse called Ashvamedha Yajna which was widespread and followed by every Hindu in ancient and medieval times, especially by Hindu kings. Here's proof from Hindu Holy books :
Harivamsa Purana, Bhavishya Parva 3.5.11-13 ”After the passage of some time, king Janamejaya, who offers plenty of tributes (in sacrifices) observed the horse sacrifice as ordained. Devi Vapushtama, the daughter of the king of Kashi, went and slept with the slain horse, according to the ritual as prescribed. Seeing the queen with beautiful limbs, Vsava (Indra) desired her. Entering the body of the dead horse, Indra had intercourse withsc the queen.” Tr. A. Purushothaman and A. Harindranath. [ http://mahabharata-resources.org/harivamsa/bhavishyaparva/hv_3_005.html ]Ashwamedha yagna of Yudhisthira
The Ashvamedha (Sanskrit: ??????? asvamedhá) is a ritual of horse sacrifice and having sex with the dead horse followed by the Srauta tradition of Vedic religion.

The horse to be sacrificed must be a stallion. The horse is sprinkled with water, and the Adhvaryu, the priest and the sacrificer whisper mantras into its ear. The horse is then set loose towards the North-East, to roam around wherever it chooses, for the period of one year (or half a year, according to some commentators). The horse is associated with the Sun, and its yearly course.[4] If the horse wanders into neighbouring provinces hostile to the sacrificer, they must be subjugated. The wandering horse is attended by a hundred young men, sons of princes or high court officials, charged with guarding the horse from all dangers and inconvenience. During the absence of the horse, an uninterrupted series of ceremonies is performed in the sacrificer's home.

After the return of the horse, more ceremonies are performed. The horse is yoked to a gilded chariot, together with three other horses, and Rigveda (RV) 1.6.1,2 (YajurVeda (YV) VSM 23.5,6) is recited. The horse is then driven into water and bathed. After this, it is anointed with ghee by the chief queen and two other royal consorts. The chief queen anoints the fore-quarters, and the others the barrel and the hind-quarters. They also embellish the horse's head, neck, and tail with golden ornaments. The sacrificer offers the horse the remains of the night's oblation of grain.

After this, the horse, a hornless he-goat, a wild ox (go-mrga, Bos gaurus) are bound to sacrificial stakes near the fire, and seventeen other animals are attached to the horse. A great number of animals, both tame and wild, are tied to other stakes, according to a commentator, 609 in total.[5]

The chief queen ritually calls on the king's fellow wives for pity. The queens walk around the dead horse reciting mantras. The chief queen (prepubscent and underage Queen) then has to spend a night copulating and having sex with the dead horse.
The Laws of Manu refer to the Ashvamedha (V.53): "The man who offers ritual of Ashvamedha Yajna every day for a hundred years, reap the same fruit of good deeds."


Sanskrit epics and Puranas mention numerous legendary performances of the Ashvamedha Yajna ritual of sex with dead horse and horse sacrifice.For example, according to the Mahabharata, Emperor Bharata performed a hundred Ashvamedha Yajna Horse sacrifice and dead horse sex ceremonies on the banks of Yamuna, three hundred on the banks of Saraswati and four hundred on the banks of the Ganga. He again performed a thousand Ashvamedha on different locations and a hundred Rajasuya.
The historical performers of Ashvamedha include:

Monarch Reign Dynasty Source
Pushyamitra Shunga 185-149 BCE Shunga Ayodhya inscription of Dhanadeva and Malavikagnimitra of Kalidasa[17]
Sarvatata 1st century BCE Gajayana Ghosundi and Hathibada inscriptions.[17] Some scholars believe Sarvatata to be a Kanva king, but there is no definitive evidence for this.[18]
Devimitra 1st century BCE Unknown Musanagar inscription[17]
Satakarni I 1st or 2nd century CE Satavahana Nanaghat inscription mentions his second Ashvamedha[19][17]
Vasishthiputra Chamtamula c. 227-250 CE Andhra Ikshvaku Records of his son and grandson[20]
Shilavarman 3rd century CE Varshaganya Jagatpur inscriptions mention his fourth Ashvamedha[17]
Pravarasena I c. 270 – c. 330 CE Vakataka Inscriptions of his descendants state that he performed four Ashvamedha sacrifices[21]
Bhavanaga 305-320 CE Nagas of Padmavati The inscriptions of Vakataka relatives of the Nagas credit them with 10 horse-sacrifices, although they do not name these kings.[17][20]
Vijaya-devavarman 300-350 CE Shalankayana Ellore inscription[21][22]
Shivaskanda Varman 4th century CE Pallava Hirahadagalli inscription[21]
Kumaravishnu 4th century CE Pallava Omgodu inscription of his great-grandson[21]
Samudragupta c. 335/350-375 CE Gupta Coins of the king and records of his descendants[21][23]
Kumaragupta I 414 – 455 CE Gupta [24]
Madhava Varman 440-460 CE Vishnukundina [20]
Dharasena 5th century CE Traikutaka [22]
Krishnavarman 5th century CE Kadamba [22]
Narayanavarman 494–518 CE Varman Legend of Bhaskaravarman's seals[25]
Bhutivarman 518–542 CE Varman Barganga inscription[25]
Pulakeshin I 543–566 CE Chalukyas of Vatapi [26]
Sthitavarman 565–585 CE Varman [27]
Pulakeshin II 610–642 CE Chalukyas of Vatapi .
Madhavaraja II (alias Madhavavarman or Sainyabhita) c. 620-670 CE Shailodbhava Inscriptions.
Simhavarman (possibly Narasimhavarman I) 630-668 CE Pallava The Sivanvayal pillar inscription states that the Hindu King Performed more than ten AshvamedhasYajna rituals of Sex with dead horse.

The Dhanadeva-Ayodhya inscription, 1st century BCE, mentions two Ashvamedha Yajna Dead Horse sex (necrophilia) rituals by A Hindu Pushyamitra in the city of Ayodhya.

The earliest recorded criticism of the ritual comes from the Carvaka, an atheistic school of Indian philosophy that assumed various forms of philosophical skepticism and religious indifference. A quotation of the Carvaka from Madhavacharya's Sarva-Darsana-Sangraha states: "The three authors of the Vedas were buffoons, knaves, and demons. All the well-known formulae of the pandits, jarphari, turphari, etc. and all the obscene rites for the queen commanded in Aswamedha, these were invented by buffoons, and so all the various kinds of presents to the priests, while the eating of flesh was similarly commanded by night-prowling demons."
-Madhavacarya, Sarvadarsana-sangraha, English translation by E. B. Cowell and A. E. Gough, 1904 quoted in Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya (ed.), Carvaka/Lokayata: An Anthology of Source Materials and Some Recent Studies (New Delhi: Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 1990)

“The utterly barbaric and obscene Hindu ritual called 'Ashvamedha Yajna’ where a underage Hindu girl is gang raped by tens of Brahmins as part of the ritual and then the little girl is forced to have sex with a Dead horse, this part of the ritual offended the Dalit reformer and framer of the Indian constitution B. R. Ambedkar and is frequently mentioned in his writings as an example of the perceived degradation of Brahmanical culture.”
-Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, Writings and Speeches. p. 1376.

# The Udayendiram inscription of the 8th century Pallava king Nandivarman II (alias Pallavamalla) states that his general Udayachandra defeated the Nishada ruler Prithvivyaghra, who performed the Ritual of Ashvamedha Yajna where it is required to have sex with dead horse and the underage prepubscent Queen is forced to be gang raped by tens of Brahmins consecutively while other Queens of the Hindu Kings shout mantras full of obscenities which are too vulgar to mention , "desiring to become very powerful, was running after the horse of the Ashvamedha".

# Drugging:
Hindu God Shiva was a Druggard Charsi and used to remain stoned on cannabis and commit adultery and insane acts like raping rishi's wives and dead bodies like aghoris which also resulted in cutting of Shiva's penis by Rishi's which formed Shiv ling worshipped by Hindus, Cannabis is still used in all Hindu Holy festivals and mixed in their sweets in Deepawali and Holi cannabis/bhaang and charas is mixed in sweets by Hindus.

# Hindu Niyog Ritual also known as wife sharing or ancient Hindu ritual of gang bang of single girl by multiple Hindu men:
In Mahabharata The 5 pandava brothers were plain bastards
Kunti, their mother, was gang raped by Indra, Vayu, Yam, Surya, etc. etc.
says scholarly indian hindu, read below
The movie anahat implies that pandavas were born using the 'niyog' or wife sharing Hindu ritual
procedure because their legal father was possibly impotent.
It is indeed true, As per mahabharat Pandu was cursed by to die as
soon
as he has intercourse with his wives by a rishi.Kunti followed Niyog
procedure to produce children with Indra ( Arjun) , Vayu ( Bheem) ,Yam
( Yudhuishtir), Surya ( Karna) and Madri with Agni for Nakul and
Sahdev. In fact Pandu, Dhritrashrtra and Vidur were also born by
Niyog with Rishi Durvasa. So the 5 Pandavas were illegitimate sons and bastards.


# In ancient Hindu traditions daughters in their prepubescent ages (3 to 12 years old) were sold as sex slaves in open market to the highest bidder, the bidders were often in their 40s,50s,60s and even older men.
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/mar/07/india-girls-women-trafficked-brides-sexual-domestic-slavery

#In the oldest Valmiki Ramayana it is stated that Hindu God Hanuman indirectly raped a animal that is a crocodile. After returning from Lanka Hanuman was sexually excited, at that time Hanuman was flying above a pond, Hanuman began Masturbating and his sperm fell in the pond which was swallowed by the Crocodile which gave birth to Hanuman son with a Crocodile.What a pervert god Hanuman was guilty of bestiality.

# Hindu holy books are banned in many foreign countries due to obscenity and violence in them, One of such country is Russia which banned Hindu holy book called ‘Bhagwat Gita’, a commendable right action on part of Russian to ban such a Obscene book, It should be used as toilet paper or for cleaning Dogs shit/poop.

# As per recorded history Prior to Middle Eastern Muslim Invasions of India, Most of Hindus used to remain Stark nude as is still observed in Sadhus at Kumbh Mela and Aghoris and remote rural Dehati Areas , Only upper caste Hindus used to wear Garments and lower caste was not permitted to wear clothes and the merciless Brahmins laid a heavy tax for even lower caste under age girls to cover their Breasts in public called 'Nangeli’. The Upper caste Brahmins wore only a dhoti and no upper garment and few upper castes only wore langot, Sherwani , Salwar -Kameez and Kurta was introduced to North India by Turks ,Persians and Mughals.Otherwise Hindus were referred to as 'Dhotichaap’ by the Middle Eastern Muslim Invaders. Muslim Invasion freed lower caste Hindus from unfair caste based disparities.

# Yet another one of Obscene Hindu rituals is Eloji worship where little girls are forced to worship Huge penis of the Pervert Hindu god Eloji.

#The reason for Hindu ritual of inviting Hijras or Homosexuals/Gays in Hindu traditional marriages explained:
‘LGBTI persons will delight in the crossdressing pastimes of Subala Milana.’
In ancient Hindu mythology, Subala, who is male, dresses in female attire. He swaps clothes with Radharani, a milkmaid and the lover of the god Krishna. Radharani meanwhile dresses in Subala’s male attire. Their likeness is so similar that they could not be told apart.

Wilhelm added: ‘In Vrndavana, India, temples still dress Radharani in male attire on this day and it is one of the rare opportunities to view Her lotus feet and receive special blessings.’

There is also the story of Shikhandi, featured in the sacred Mahabharata. This is one of the two major epics of ancient India, written in the Sanskrit language.

Shikhandi was born a woman (with the name Shikhandini) but was raised as a man. He was then arranged to marry a woman.

But when she found out he was actually a girl, she insulted him and he fled. He then met a yaksha (spirit) who agreed to exchange his gender.

Shikhandini then returned as a man with the name ‘Shikhandi’ and led a happy married life with his wife and children.

There are also many androgynous and intersex themes in Hindu mythology.

Gods sometimes changed sex and non-divine beings underwent sex-changes through the actions of the gods. This could’ve been as a result of curses or blessings, or as the natural outcome of reincarnation.

Modern day Hindu Hijra(??????) people still blur gender.

Hijra are still blurring gender lines in India today. If you were to translate the word hijra into English, you may call them transgender. But actually, it’s a far more complicated social and cultural identity than just that.

While they are shunned in some circumstances, they are also important to Indian cultural life. No Hindu wedding is blessed if hijra don’t attend it. And increasingly they are getting protection and are starting to get access to better jobs.

Hijras are officially recognized as third gender by some governments in Southeast Asia. They can be transgender, intersex or eunuchs.


# Homosexuality in Ancient Hindu Lands was a common thing among Hindu God's, Hindu Kings and Local Hindu populace.
Ancient Hindu societies considered homosexuality as a common act. In fact, a ancient archaeological evidence from India that is a medical text dating back to 600BC mentions two different types of homosexual men. Kumbhika are ‘men who take the passive role’ in anal sex; and asekya are ‘men who devour the semen of other men’.

It also states men who behave like women, or women who behave like men, are determined at conception in the womb.

And it states if two women have sex and one becomes pregnant, the child will be born without bones. This is because they believed a father provides bones and mothers provide flesh and blood.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.gaystarnews.com/article/this-is-how-hinduism-lgbti-people-are-celebrating-diwali-this-year/amp/

# There is Ancient barbaric ritual of Hindu Boys and men raping dead bodies of little girls , that is necrophilia+pedophilia, which still followed by Aghori Sadhus. Hindus and Aghori Sadhus (A sect of Hinduism) have sex with menstruating women and drink the menstruation blood of women and are extremely disgusting. Such Hindu rituals were banned under British Rule, Turkish,Persian and Mughal rule in India, but few Hindu Aghori Sadhus still follow it.
https://edtimes.in/cannibalism-cannabis-sex-with-corpses-nudity-read-about-the-aghori-sadhus-of-varanasi/
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2Fwvu7RokOg

# Idiotic and illiterate Indians:
The word ‘Babu’ used in everyday vocabulary by Hindus is probably derived from "baboons" which is a derogatory term for ‘monkeys’.
During the British rule in India, the Indians serving them often used to imitate their English superiors,
for which the English people mocked them as baboons (monkeys: as monkeys are known for imitating).

The Indian servants felt it an honourable term and the word got slowly changed to babu, very much similiar to the 'babu' in gov. Offices.

#INCEST:
References to incest abound even in the Rig Veda, showing that the perversion of brother-sister incest was introduced by the Hindu-Aryan savages who invaded India :

`Lord' Krishna lived in incest with his sister Subhadra, sharing her with his brother Balarama Mah.wh.153 . "In the festivals of that God Jagannath , the 3 images of Krishna, his brother Balarama, and his sister Subhadra, are brought prominently forward; and the populace do not fail to heap reproaches upon Krishna, and upon his sister likewise, for having indulged in a criminal intimacy" Mah.wh 153 . Again, " In the older tradition, Subhadra Krishna's sister is said to have lived in criminal intimacy with both her brothers. This tradition is universally known and believed by the people in spite of the story of the marriage of Subhadra to Arjun ; and the Mussalmans frequently taunt the Hindus with the fact. The Pundits reconcile the stories by a fiction of there having been two Subhadras. As to Krishna's proceedings, they are expalined away as Maya, or delusion." -- Mah.wh.153 b.. The Vedic Pushan is the lover of his sister Rg Ved VI.55.4 Apte 11 . No wonder so many Hindus have intercourse with their sisters ! c.. The Aryan God Agni is the lover of his own sister Rg Ved X.3.3 Apte 11 . A true model for all Aryans ! d.. Ashvins are referred to as the sons of Savitar and Ushas who are brother and sister Apte 11 . No doubt many pious Arya Hindus are the offspring of siblings. e.. The Ashvisns married Surya and Savitri who is their sister RV I.116.19 . f.. Agni is the son of his father and his sister Rg Ved.I.91.7 g.. Yama wards off his sister Yami, saying marriage between brother and sister is forbidden Rg.V.X.10 Apte 11 . This is the first indication that the Aryans had at least some moral sense ! However, this verse is evidently a later interpolation. Father-daughter incest occurs in the famous story of Prajapati (later identified with Brahma, in turn incorporated as an incarnation of Vishnu) and his daughter RV III.31.1-2 .

It is evident that the strict laws on male-female relations led to the repression of normal practies and played a role in the rise of various perversions like brother-sister incest, father-daughter incest etc. Strict ascetism always leads to the rise of perversions. Even to this day incest of varying degrees (cross-cousin, father-daughter, mother-son, brother-sister, etc.) is extremely common amongst the Indo-Aryans. No other race on earth has ever recorded such a prevalance of this practice. Just as sodomy has its home in Persia, Lesbianism in ancient Lesbos, so incest has its home amongst the Indo-Aryans.
# Hindu tradition of Devdasi also known as Temple prostitution:
Underage lower caste Girls usually between 3 to 8 years old are forced to become sexual slaves and to perform Kamasutra dances at the local Temple for the Higher caste Brahmins. Such little girls also experience forced labour and their internal organs are destroyed due to premature sex with way older Brahmin Pundits.

#Jogini:

# The word Hindu itself is of Persio-Arabic origin, a middle eastern (Arab/Persian) word for people residing besides the rivers in Sindh.


“The term Hindi originally was used by the Persians to refer to inhabitants of the region east of the Indus. It was borrowed from Classical Persian Hindi (Iranian Persian Hindi), meaning "Indian", from the proper noun Hind "India".”
-Steingass, Francis Joseph (1892). A comprehensive Persian-English dictionary. London: Routledge & K. Paul. p. 1514.
(http://dsalsrv02.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/philologic/getobject.pl?c.7:1:6823.steingass)

Hindu is a geographical term used by persians for land on other side of Sindhu river. All religions which arose in this geographical region were erroneously called Hindu by the Mughals first, and later by the British.

The British were the first to use Hinduism for a religion, when Smarthas with British wanted Manusmriti laws to rule India under Anglo-Hindu Law.

“The name Hindavi was used by Amir Khusrow in his poetry.”
-Khan, Rajak. "Indo-Persian Literature and Amir Khusro". University of Delhi
(http://vle.du.ac.in/mod/book/print.php?id=11660)

The meaning of the word Hindu in ancient Persian dictionary depicts that Hindus were considered inferior,Illiterates, barbaric and subhumane by the Persians. (Hindus to be distinguished with Dalits and Dravidians the real natives of India).

“It is correct that the name “Hindu” has been given to the original Indian race of the region by Muslim invaders to humiliate them. In Arabic and Persian the word “Hindu” means “Black Slave” and/or “Black Thief” & "Black Dog”. The Indian subcontinent is inhabited by dark/black complexioned people of the Australoid Race. The Aryans (fair/white skinned) took the native Hindus as slaves and sold them all over the world. The original Indians are of the Australoid race and are dark/black skinned. The Aryans are the modern day Iran (Land of the Aryans) of today (Persians).”

-Maharishi Shri Dayanand Sarswati Aur Unka Kaam, edited by Lala Lajpat Rai, published from Lahore in 1898.

“Had they [ the Persians and the British ] not given us the name ” Hindu ” we could have divided ourselves into various religion – like Saivites, Vaishnavites, Sakthas, Muruga Bhakts and as devotees of Ellai Amma – in every town . Is there a common God for Saivites and Vaishnavites? No, Siva is not the God of Vaishnavites; the militant Saivites say that Vishnu is not a God at all, but only a devotee of Lord Shiva. Can anyone consider these two as belonging to a single religion? The Mughals and the British gave a common name – HINDU, and we are saved. The name that they christened saved us.”

– Sri Chandrasekarendra Saraswathi, Kanchi Paramacharya, Voice of God Volume 1, Page: 266. [Tamil Edn]

Prior to Muslim Invaders and Britishers merging all Indian Subcontinent religions as a conglomeration under one head called Hinduism, India had different religions ,Shaivites were the followers of Kapalan/Aghori god Shiva, then we had Vaishnavites the followers of Hindu God Vishnu and so on for the 330 million Hindu God's, then we had Aryan Vedic religion or Brahminism and we had Jainism and Buddhism all of these religions had conflicts with each other and through out the past had fought each other for superiority.

“The political situation of our country( Indian Subcontinent) from centuries past, say 20-
25 centuries has made it very difficult to understand the nature of
this nation and its religion. The western scholars, and historians,
too, have failed to trace the true name of this Brahmanland, a vast
continent like country, and therefore, they have contended
themselves by calling it by that meaningless term “Hindu.” This
word, which is a foreign innovation, is not made use by any of our
Sanskrit writers and revered Acharyas in their works. It seems that
political power was responsible for insisting upon continuous use of
the word Hindu. The word Hindu is found, of course, in Persian
literature. Hindu-e-falak means “the black of the sky’ and Saturn.”
In the Arabic language Hind not Hindu means nation. It is shameful
and ridiculous to have read all along in history that the name Hindu
was given by the Persians to the people of our country when they
landed on the sacred soil of Sindhu.”
-[R. N. Suryanarayan, Universal
Religion, p 1-2, published from Mysore in 1952.]

“ it is correct that this name 'Hindu’ has been given to the original Aryan race of
the region by Muslim invaders to humiliate them. In Persian, says
our author, the word means slave, and according to Islam, all those
who did not embrace Islam were termed as slaves.”
- [Maharishi Shri
Dayanand Sarswati Aur Unka Kaam, edited by Lala Lajpat Rai,
published from Lahore in 1898, in the chapter of introduction.]

Besides, a ancient Persian dictionary titled Lughet-e-Kishwari, republished in
Lucknow in 1964, gives the meaning of Hindu as ‘chore (thief), dakoo
(dacoit), raahzan (waylayer), and ghulam (slave)’. Yet according to
an other dictionary named Urdu-Feroze-ul-Laghat – part 1 (page 615),
the meaning of the word Hindu is as under: In Turkish: chore,
raahzan and lutera (looter). In Persian: ghulam (slave), barda
(obedient servant), sia faam (black color) and kaalaa (black). The
hypothesis that Persians had difficulty in pronouncing Sindhu is
baseless and preposterous. For example, how do the Persians who are
Shia Muslims pronounce words like Shia, Sunni and Shariat? In
Punjabi there are many, many words of Persian origin, which start
with “s” and “sh.” For example, sardar or sirdar (leader), shaheed
(martyr), shhadat (martyrdom) shair (lion), sahir (town), sar (walk)
shayer (poet), shakar (sugar), sja (punishment), siahi (black ink),
siah(black) and so on. The word Punjab is also derived from Persian
panj and aab (five waters).

“ To find the meaning of “Hindu” one ought to look at the term “Hindu
Kush”(killer of Hindus). Who were the people, who named this
mountain range as Hindu Kush? Why these mountains were called the
killers of Hindus? As I mentioned earlier, the Indian subcontinent
was inhabited by dark complexioned people before the migration of
Caucasian tribes from the Caucasus region. The fair skinned
Caucasian tribes who lived on the Northwest of Hindu Kush Mountain
range called the Indian subcontinent as the land of Hindus (land of
black people). The Northwest expansion of the inhabitants of Indus
Valley was prevented by of Hindu Kush Mountains. Whenever the plain
dwelling Indians (Hindus) attempted to cross these mountains, they
met death due harsh terrain and heavy snow. That is how these
mountains were given the name Hindu Kush by mountain dwelling
Caucasian tribes. Once a large number of Indian Hindu slaves died on these
mountains due to heavy snow fall while being carried to their slave masters and that is how these mountains
acquired the name “Hindu Kush” – killer of the Hindus. “
-[Bhai Kahan
Singh Nabha, Mahan Kosh, 1996 edn. p 275.]

Later on when the Caucasian tribes conquered Northwest India, they
continued using the name Hindu for native Indians. To humiliate the
natives, the Caucasians ridiculed their culture, looks and black
complexion, and used derogatory expressions for them. It is
astonishing that these derogatory expressions have survived through
thousands of years of Indian history and are found in modern Indian
languages. “Blackness” is used in bad connotation in Indian
languages. For example, in Punjabi there are expressions like, kaala
munh (black mouth, ugly or who speaks ill), kaali Jeebh ( evil
speaking tounge), kaala chore (notorious thief), kaala dhandha
(illegal profession), kaala dhan (black money), kaali bhaid (black
sheep), kalai laikh (black deeds) and kaala chum (black skinned
person). There are also expressions like bandar munhan (monkey face)
and rish jeha (bear-like), which the Caucasians used to describe the
features of native Indians (Hindus). In Ramyan, the two native
devotees of Shri Ramchandra are depicted as a monkey (Hanuman) and
a bear (Jamawant).


# White Skin Frenzy:
The Muslim conquers used the word Hindu for all the Indians.
However, Hindus, who supported the Muslim rulers in the
establishment of their authority over Hindu masses, were honored
with titles like Chaudhary, Malik, Dewan, Shah, Raizada, Rayees,
Munshi, Mahajan and others. Nowadays, the descendents of those
Hindus bear these titles with great pride as surnames. Shah did not
find the meaning of “Hindu” as black because he searched the wrong
sources. Moreover, even if Shah had found that “Hindu” means black,
he would have been hesitant to accept it, as the inferiority complex
of “blackness” is deeply imbedded in the psyche of Indians. Most
Indians except the Dalits consider themselves as the descendants of
Caucasian tribes, who ruled over India before the onslaught of
Muslims. So for Hindus to accept that “Hindu” means black would make
them the descendants of native Indians, who are black people That is
why Hindus insist that “Hindu” is the corrupted form of Sindhu.
Indians of today are the products of thousands of years of
miscegenation between Caucasian groups and native Indians. However,
Indians are reluctant to admit this fact. Excluding Kashmiris, the
complexion of the Indian population varies from ‘light tan’
to ‘ebony black’ and the majority is quite dark. Indians despise
black skin color is in spite of the fact that Indians are considered
non-white by Europeans. For instance, in Indian movies, invariably,
the hero and heroine have Caucasian features and lighter skin color
than most of the population. Moreover, in the matrimonial columns in
Indian newspapers everyone looks for a spouse of lighter color. Why
does a dark person want to marry a person of lighter color? Is it
because the dark person is not comfortable with his or her color and
want to improve the color of his or her progeny. The superiority of
white skin is deeply imbedded in the Indian psyche because ever
since the conquest of Indus Valley by Caucasians, India has been
ruled by white people like Aryans, Persians, Macedonians, Scythians,
Huns, Arabs, Turks, Afghanas, Mangols, Portugese, French and
English. When the English left, Indians crowned Jawahar Lal Nehru,
who was the fairest among the Hindu leaders. In the words of a
socialist leader, Madhu Limaye, Nehru practiced both racism and
casteism, despite his modern upbringing and outlook (Telegraph,
Calcutta, November 21, 1987). In a revealing passage about
his “making,” Nehru wrote, “Behind me lie somewhere in the sub-
conscience, racial memories of hundred or whatever the numbers may
be, generations of Brahmans. I cannot get rid of that past
inheritance.” [Jawaharlal Nehru, An Autobiography (1936)), 1980
edn., p 596.] Being a fair skinned Brahman he rode roughshod over
other leaders. The so-called iron man Patel or president Rajindra
Parsad did not dare to challenge Nehru over his policies. The reason
could be that both of them belonged to lower castes and had very
dark complexion. It is intriguing why Mahatma Gandhi, a Gujrati
Bania with caricature personality, insisted upon making Nehru his
heir apparent, while ignoring others who were equally qualified. Was
it Nehru’s fair skin, which impressed Gandhi the most? Similarly,
why couldn’t the Congress Party find a single person in the whole
country worthy enough to be its leader? It turned to Sonia Gandhi,
who like her late husband does not understand or speak Hindi very
well. What qualifications distinguish her from other Congress
leaders? Is it her fair skin? In Pashto, the language of the
dominant Afghan tribe of Pashtoons, Hindu is pronounced as Indu (h
is silent). The Greeks called the people of Indus Valley Indos or
Indus and hence, the name India. The Muslims called it Hindustan.
Bharat or Bhartvarsha may be the name of a mythical kingdom in Hindu
scriptures or of a small principality located in the state of Uttar
Pardesh but it was never the name of the Indian subcontinent.

Whereas Hinduism is derived from the word Hindu, the names of the
other three religions, Buddhism, Janism and Sikhism founded on the
Indian subcontinent are derived from Indian words with noble
meanings: “Budh” (enlightenment), “Jan”[victorious (over vices)]
and “Sikh”(learner), respectively.

Does it make any sense for Indians who are never tired of talking
about the glory of their past, their religion and their civilization
to call themselves “Hindus” when this word is not found in any Hindu
text? The foreigners gave this derogatory label “Hindu” to the
people of the Indian subcontinent. What right or justification do
the champions of “Hindutva” have to apply this derogatory
label “Hindu” to others, Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists? Have Hindus no
sense of shame or decency? It’s no wonder that Sanskrit does not
have the equivalents of words like jameer (conscience), emaan (moral
conviction) and vfa
(fidelity).

India will remain mired in religious, caste, linguistic and ethnic
strifes as long as Indians don’t come to terms with their past
history objectively and learn from it.

# RITUALS:
#Dowry: When Sita was married to Sri Ram, carts full of jewelry, Mohurs etc. were sent with her. Besides these thousands of horses, elephants and chariots were given to her. Hundreds of male and female slaves were also gifted.