Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Fighters, Bombers and Recon Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: The High Cost Of Staying On Top
SYSOP    7/14/2015 5:25:23 AM
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
jessmo_24       7/15/2015 5:11:39 AM
The Russians apparently in their ZEAL to terrify the west have forgotten to keep the Russian air force properly airworthy.
 

Paul Schwartz, a nonresident senior associate who focuses on Russia with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, notes that it is not unusual for Russian aircraft to experience a "spate of incidents," but that the current rate of aircraft loss is beyond the norm.

The numbers bear that out. Since 2010, when the Russian government began putting its Air Force back into regular action under former-Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov, it has experienced over 30 crashes, hardly ever breaking more than one a month, according to Russian news reports — a stark contrast to the last month of aircraft losses.

There is "clearly a linkage between the increased tempo of military operations undertaken over the last year and a half and the increased spate of accidents for military aircraft," Schwartz said.

"It's clearly taking a turn upwards."

The Russian source pointed to the stress placed on the Russian fleets by demanding patrol and exercise rates over the past several years — and since the start of the Ukraine crisis in particular.

"The majority of the equipment, apart from the [recent crash] of a newer Su-34, is very old. Under [Defense Ministers] Anatoly Serdyukov and Sergei Shoigu, the planes are being used very extensively, especially during these so-to-speak famous snap inspections," the source said.

"If you start to extensively use equipment made many years ago, even if the equipment is certified [in good shape], the percentage of failure becomes higher," he added.

The issue of aging gear is not one faced just by Russia, points out Richard Aboulafia, an analyst for the Teal Group. In fact, it has some similarities to the situation faced by the US Air Force, where service leaders have explicitly said they need to recapitalize aging fleets.

But the situation in Russia, where sustainment and upkeep have never been strong suits, is worse.

"It's exactly like us, except for a couple very big differences — we take sustainment seriously and we build robust systems," he said. "They don't."

Schwartz notes that while the Russians have made changes since 2008 in how they do sustainment and maintenance, historically "the amount they expand on maintenance has been substandard when compared with Western approaches."

The poor state of Russia's defense industry is also contributing to the state of Russia's aircraft fleet, said Vadim Kozyulin, a military expert at the Moscow-based PIR Center think tank.

"These old aircraft require a lot of maintenance, and the spare parts currently in stock are old," Kozyulin said, noting that when it comes to maintenance personnel, the older ones are experienced while the younger ones are not qualified.

 
 
Im curious on how Russian will threaten the west, in a conflict with planes falling from the sky.
 
Quote    Reply

Nate Dog    run at 6th gen warplanes...   7/15/2015 7:20:16 PM
Yeah, right.
Sorry, you'll pardon my scepticism, but the russian aviation industry are struggling to put out UAV's that are comparable to the stuff US and Israelis were pumping out in the 80's, so much so that they still buy all their high end UAV's from Israel. With that in mind, how on earth could they possibly try and leap frog a technological level they can't even achieve? From a dual point of view. They haven't been able to produce jets that are adequate for 4th gen planes, they haven't managed to produce current generation UAV's, now they expect to amalgamate 2 disparate tech lines of development when they haven't managed to master either.....
Nope.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics